Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 1994-12
Problems and Prospects of Studying Immigrant Adaptation from the 1990 Population Census: From Generational Comparisons to the Process of “Becoming American” 1
With the loss of the question on parental birthplace in the 1980 and 1990 censuses, there are serious obstacles to current research on immigrant adaption based on the traditional logic of intergenerational progress. The tremendous diversity across contemporary immigrant streams from more dian 40 country/region-of-origin groups, however, reinforces the singular importance of census data for national studies of the post-1965 immigrants and their children. A potentially useful research strategy is to examine variations in socioeconomic adaptation by duration of American residence among immigrants who arrived as children or teenagers. Exploratory investigation using this framework reveals a dominant pattern of successful adaptation with greater exposure to American society (“becoming American”), but also some mixed patterns that are more consistent with the segmented assimilation model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeanF. D., EdmonstonB., and PasselJ. S. eds. 1990Undocumented Migration to the United States.Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
2.
BonacichE., and ModellJ.1980The Economic Basis of Ethnic Solidarity: Small Business in the Japanese American Community.Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
BriggsV.1984Immigration Policy and the American Labor Force.Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
4.
CarpenterN.1927Immigrants and Their Children, 1920: A Study Based on Census Statistics Relative to the Foreign-Born and the Native White of Foreign or Mixed Parentage.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Reprinted in 1960 by Arno Press, New York.
5.
ChiswickB. R.1978“The Effect of Americanization on the Earnings of Foreign-Born Men,”Journal of Political Economy, 86: 897–921.
6.
DanielsR.1990Coming to America: A History of Immigration and Ethnicity in American Life.New York: Harper Collins.
7.
DinnersteinL., and ReimersD. M.1982Ethnic Americans: A History of Immigration and Assimilation.Cambridge, MA: Harper and Row.
8.
DuncanB., and DuncanO. D.1968“Minorities and the Process of Stratification,”American Sociological Review, 33: 356–364.
9.
FarleyR.1991“The New Census Question about Ancestry: What Did It Tell Us?”, Demography, 28: 411–430.
10.
FuchsL. H.1990The American Kaleidoscope: Race, Ethnicity and the Civic Culture.Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
11.
GansH.1992“Second-Generation Decline: Scenarios for the Economic and Ethnic Futures of the Post-1965 American Immigrants,”Ethnic and Racial Studies, 15: 173–192.
12.
GordonM.1964Assimilation in American Life.New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
HandlinO.1973The Uprooted: The Epic Story of the Great Migrations That Made the American People. (1951) Second Edition.Boston: Little, Brown.
14.
HirschmanC., and KralyE. P.1990“Immigrants, Minorities, and Earnings in the United States: 1950,”International Migration Review, 24: 4–33.
15.
HirschmanC., and KralyE. P.1988“Racial and Ethnic Inequality in the United States: 1940 and 1950,”Ethnic and Racial Studies, 11: 332–365.
16.
HutchinsonE. P.1956Immigrants and Their Children, 1850–1950.New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
17.
JassoG., and RosenzweigM. R.1990The New Chosen People: Immigrants in the United States.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
18.
KitanoH. H. L.1976Japanese Americans: The Evolution of a Subculture.Second Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19.
LevineD. B., HillK., and WarrenR. eds. 1985Immigration Statistics: A Story of Neglect.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
20.
LiebersonS.1980A Piece of the Pie: Black and White Immigrants Since 1880.Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
McKenneyN. R., and CresceA. R.1993“Measurement of Ethnicity in the United States: Experiences of the U.S. Bureau of the Census.” In Challenges of Measuring an Ethnic World: Science, Politics, and Reality: Proceedings of the Joint Canada-United States Conference on the Measurement of Ethnicity, April 1–3, 1992.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Pp. 173–221.
22.
MonteroD.1980Japanese Americans: Changing Patterns of Ethnic Affiliation over Three Generations.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
23.
NeidertL. J., and FarleyR.1985“Assimilation in the United States: An Analysis of Ethnic and Generation Differences in Status and Achievement,”American Sociological Review, 50: 840–850.
24.
PasselJ. S., and EdmonstonB.1994“Immigration and Race: Recent Trends in Immigration to the United States.” In Immigration and Ethnicity: The Integration of America's Newest Arrivals. Ed. EdmonstonB., and PasselJ. S.Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press. Pp. 31–71.
25.
PortesA., and RumbautR. G.1990Immigrant America: A Portrait.Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
PortesA., and ZhouM.1993“The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants,”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 530: 74–96. Nov.
27.
ReimersD. M.1992Still the Golden Door: The Third World Comes to America.Second Edition. New York: Columbia University Press.
28.
ThernstromS. ed. 1980Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
U.S. Bureau of the Census1993a Census of Population: The Foreign-Born Population in the United States, 1990 CP-3-1.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
30.
U.S. Bureau of the Census1993b 1990 Census of Population: The Asians and Pacific Islanders in the United States, 1990 CP-3-5.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
31.
U.S. Bureau of the Census1993c 1990 Census of Population: Persons of Hispanic Origin in the United States, 1990 CP-3-3.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
32.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of International Labor Affairs1989The Effects of Immigration on the U.S. Labor Economy and Labor Market. Immigration Policy and Research, Report No. 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
