This study uses a new source of data to assess trends and patterns of female migration from Mexico. Data were collected from migrants interviewed in ten Mexican communities from 1987 through 1990, as well as from outmigrants from those communities who were later located in the United States. The first part of the analysis examines changes in migrant behavior throughout the 1980s by estimating trends in the probability of first-time and repeat migration and by assessing the impact of the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) on these trends. In general, migration probabilities were lower for women than those reported elsewhere for men, but the evidence suggests that, like men, once women begin migrating, they are virtually assured of migrating on a second trip. Results from the departure models in the second half of the article suggest that recent female migration reflects access to the productive resources in Mexican society and a process of family migration whereby women migrate after their husbands and fathers legalized as part of IRCA.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeanF. D., EspenshadeT. J., WhiteM. J. and DymowskiR. F.1990“Post-IRCA Chances in the Volume and Composition of Undocumented Migration to the United States: An Assessment Based on Apprehensions Data.” In Undocumented Migration to the United States: IRCA and the Experience of the 1980s. Edited by BeanF. D., EdmonstonB. and PasselJ. S., Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Pp. 111–158.
2.
BeanF. D., VernezG. and KeelyC.B.1989Opening and Closing the Doors: Evaluating Immigration Reform and Control.Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
3.
CardenasM. n.d. “La Mujer y La Migration a los Estados Unidos en Chavinda, Michoacan.” Unpublished paper.
4.
CorneliusW. A.1990“Impacts of the 1986 U.S. Immigration Law on Emigration from Rural Mexican Sending Communities.” In Undocumented Migration to the United States: IRCA and the Experience of the 1980s. Edited by BeanF. D., EdmonstonB. and PasselJ. S.Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Pp. 227–250.
5.
CorneliusW. A.1989“Impacts of the 1986 U.S. Immigration Law on Emigration from Rural Mexican Sending Communities,”Population and Development Review, 15:689–705.
6.
DonatoK. M. and MasseyD. S.1993“Effect of the Immigration Reform and Control Act on the Wages of Mexican Migrants,”Social Science Quarterly, 74(3):523–541.
7.
DonatoK. M., DurandJ. and MasseyD. S.1992“Changing Conditions in the U.S. Labor Market: Effects of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986,”Population Research and Policy Review, 11(2):93–115.
8.
DonatoK. M., DurandJ. and MasseyD. S.1992“Stemming the Tide? Assessing the Deterrent Effects of the Immigration Reform and Control Act,”Demography, 29(2):139–157.
9.
DagodagW. T.1975“Source Regions and Composition of Illegal Mexican Immigration to California”International Migration Review, 9:499–511.
10.
DurandJ. and MasseyD. S.1992“Generalizations about Mexico-U.S. Migration: A Critical Review,”Latin American Research Review, 27(2).
11.
EspenshadeT. J.1990“Undocumented Migration to the United States: Evidence from a Repeated Trials Model.” In Undocumented Migration to the United States: IRCA and the Experience of the 1980s. Edited by BeanF. D., EdmonstonB. and PasselJ. S.Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
12.
GabacciaD.1992Seeking Common Ground: Women Immigrants to the United States.Wesport, CT: Greenwood Press.
13.
GabacciaD.1989“America's Immigrant Women: A Review Essay,”Journal of American Ethnic History, 8:127–133.
14.
Gonzalez de la RochaM. and LatapiA. E.1990“The Impact of IRCA on the Migration Patterns of a Community in Los Altos, Jalisco, Mexico.”Commission for the Study of International Migration and Cooperative Economic Development, Working Paper No. 41.
15.
GoodisT. A.1986“A Layman's Guide to 1986 U.S. Immigration Reform.”Impacts of Immigration in California Policy. Discussion Paper PDS-86-4. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
16.
GrasmuckS. and PessarR. P.1991Between Two Islands: Dominican International Migration.Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
Hondagneu-SoteloP.1992“Overcoming Patriarchal Constraints: The Reconstruction of Gender Relations among Mexican Immigrant Women and Men,”Gender and Society, 6(3):393–415.
18.
HoustounM. F., KramerR. C. and BarrettJ. M.1984“Female Predominance in Immigration to the United States since 1930: A First Look,”International Migration Review, 28(4):908–963.
19.
JassoG. and RosenzweigM. R.1990The New Chosen People: Immigrants in the United States.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
20.
JonesR. C.1988“Micro Source Regions of Mexican Undocumented Migration,”National Geographic Research, 4:11–22.
21.
LindstromD. P.1991“The Differential Role of Family Networks in Individual Migration Decisions.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Washington, DC.
22.
MasseyD. S.1988“Economic Development and International Migration in Comparative Perspective,”Population and Development Review, 14(3).
23.
MasseyD. S.1987“Understanding Mexican Migration to the United States,”American Journal of Sociology, 92:1372–1403.
24.
MasseyD. S.1985“The Settlement Process among Mexican Migrants to the United States: New Methods and Findings.” In Immigration Statistics: A Story of Neglect.Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Pp. 255–292.
25.
MasseyD. S., AlarconR., DurandJ. and GonzalezH.1987Return to Aztlan: The Social Process of International Migration from Western Mexico.Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
MasseyD. S., DonateK. M. and LiangZ.1990“Effects of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986: Preliminary Data from Mexico.” In Undocumented Migration to the United States: IRCA and the Experience of the 1980s. Edited by BeanF. D., EdmonstonB. and PasselJ. S.Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
27.
MasseyD. S. and LiangZ.1989“The Long Term Consequences of a Temporary Worker Program: The U.S. Bracero Experience,”Population Research and Policy Review, 8:199–226.
28.
MinesR. and MasseyD. S.1985“Patterns of Migration to the United States from Two Mexican Communities,”Latin American Research Review, 20:104–124.
29.
NorthD. S. and HoustounM. F.1976The Characteristics and Role of Illegal Aliens in the U.S. Labor Market: The U.S. Bracero Experience.Washington, DC: Litton.
30.
PasselJ. S. and WoodrowK. A.1987“Change in the Undocumented Alien Population in the United States, 1979–1983,”International Migration Review, 21:1304–1334.
31.
PedrazaS.1991“Women and Migration: The Social Consequences of Gender,”Annual Review of Sociology, 17:303–325.
32.
RanneyS. and KossoudjiS. A.1984“The Labor Market Experience of Female Migrants: The Case of Temporary Mexican Migration to the U.S.”International Migration Review, 18(4):1120–1143.
33.
ReichertJ. and MasseyD. S.1980“History and Trends in U.S. Bound Migration from a Mexican Town,”International Migration Review, 14(4):475–491.
34.
ReichertJ. and MasseyD. S.1979“Patterns of U.S. Migration from a Mexican Sending Community: A Comparison of Legal and Illegal Migrants,”International Migration Review, 13(4):599–623.
35.
SimonR. J. and DeLeyM.1984“The Work Experience of Undocumented Mexican Women Migrants in Los Angeles,”International Migration Review, 18(4):1212–1229.
36.
StierH. and TiendaM.1992“Family, Work and Women: The Labor Supply of Hispanic Immigrant Women,”International Migration Review, 26(4):1291–1313.
37.
TyreeA. and DonatoK. M.1986“A Demographic Overview of the International Migration of Women.” In International Migration: The Female Experience. Edited by SimonR. J. and BrettellC.B.
38.
TyreeA. and DonatoK. M.1985“The Sex Composition of Legal Immigrants to the United States,”Sociology and Social Research, 69(4):577–585.
39.
U.S. General Accounting Office1990Immigration Reform: Employer Sanctions and the Question of Discrimination.Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
40.
WarrenR. and PasselJ. S.1987“A Count of the Uncountable: Estimates of Undocumented Aliens Counted in the 1980 United States Census,”Demography, 24:375–393.
41.
WhiteM. J., BeanF. D. and EspenshadeT. J.1990“The U.S. 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act and Undocumented Migration to the United States,”Population Research and Policy Review, 9:93–116.
