Cross-sectional and longitudinal variations in rates of intergroup marriage have often been used as indicators of assimilation for minority groups. This article demonstrates that both types of comparisons can give misleading results when census data are used for calculating intermarriage rates without restrictions. Census data include immigrants who married abroad (IMAs) in the enumeration. The inclusion of these individuals in the study of intermarriage inevitably biases the level of minority inmarriage upward, making cross-sectional and longitudinal comparisons of intermarriage rates for groups with different levels of IMAs inappropriate. Cumulation of IMAs also inflates the inmarriage rates of older cohorts, leading to a misimpression of increasing outmarriage among younger cohorts. These problems are illustrated for several Asian groups using 1980 Public Use Microdata Sample data for California. Alternative approaches for remedying the problem are proposed and their different implications for assimilation theory and research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbaR.D.1985“Interethnic and Interracial Marriage in the 1980 Census.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association. Washington, DC.
2.
AlbaR., and GoldenR.M.1986“Patterns of Ethnic Marriage in the United States,”Social Forces, 65: 202–23.
3.
BeanF.D., and BradshawB.J.1970“Intermarriage between Persons of Spanish and Non-Spanish Surname: Changes from the Mid-19th to the Mid-20th Century,”Social Science Quarterly, 51: 389–95.
4.
BlauP.M., BeekerC., and FitzpatrickK.M.1984“Intersecting Social Affiliations and Intermarriage,”Social Forces, 62: 585–606.
5.
GardnerR., RobeyB., and SmithP.C.1985“Asian Americans: Growth, Change and Diversity,”Population Bulletin, 40: 1–43.
6.
GurakD.T., and FitzpatrickJ.P.1982“Intermarriage among Hispanic Ethnic Groups in New York City,”American Journal of Sociology, 87(4): 921–34.
7.
GurakD.T., and KritzM.M.1978“Intermarriage Patterns in the U.S.: Maximizing Information from the U.S. Census Public Use Samples,”Review of Public Data Use, 6(2): 333–43.
8.
HerrD.M.1966“Negro-White Marriage in the United States,”Journal of Marriage and the Family, 28: 262–73.
9.
KikumuraA., and KitanoH.H.L.1973“Interracial Marriage: A Picture of the Japanese Americans,”Journal of Social Issues, 29(2): 67–81.
10.
KitanoH.H.L., YeungW.T., ChaiL., and HatanakaH.1984“Asian-American Interracial Marriage,”Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46: 179–90.
11.
LabovT., and JacobsJ.A.1986“Intermarriage in Hawaii, 1950–1983,”Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48: 79–88.
12.
LeonJ.J.1975“Sex-ethnic Marriage in Hawaii: A Nonmetric Multidimensional Analysis,”Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37: 775–81.
13.
LeeS.M., and YamanakaK.1987“Intermarriage in the Asian American Population.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association. Chicago.
14.
LiebersonS.1966“The Price-Zubrzycki Measure of Ethnic Intermarriage,”Eugenics Quarterly, 13: 92–100.
15.
LiebersonS., and WatersM.C.1985“Ethnic Mixtures in the United States,”Sociology and Social Research, 70: 43–52.
16.
MonahanT.P.1976“An Overview of Statistics on Interracial Marriage in the United States, with Data on Its Extent from 1963–1970,”Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38: 223–31.
17.
MurguiaE.1982Chicano Intermarriage: A Theoretical and Empirical Study.San Antonio: Trinity University Press.
18.
MurguiaE., and FrisbieP.1977“Trends in Mexican American Intermarriage: Recent Findings in Perspective,”Social Science Quarterly, 58: 374–84.
19.
Population Reference Bureau1988“Marriage Data Not Vital?”Population Today, 16(5): 4, 8.
20.
PriceC.A., and ZubrzyckiJ.1962a “Immigrant Marriage Patterns in Australia,”Population Studies, 16: 123–133.
21.
PriceC.A., and ZubrzyckiJ.1962b “The Use of Inter-Marriage Statistics as an Index of Assimilation,”Population Studies, 16: 58–69.
22.
SchoenR., and CohenL.E.1980“Ethnic Endogamy among Mexican American Grooms: A Reanalysis of Generational and Occupational Effects,”American Journal of Sociology, 86: 359–69.
23.
SchoenR., NelsonV.E., and CollinsM.1978“Intermarriage among Spanish Surnamed Californians, 1962–1974,”International Migration Review, 12: 359–69. Fall.
24.
SchwertfegerM.M.1982“Interethnic Marriage and Divorce in Hawaii: A Panel Study of 1968 First Marriages,”Marriage and Family Review, 5(1): 49–59.
25.
StevensG., and SwicegoodG.1987“The Linguistic Context of Ethnic Endogamy,”American Sociological Review, 52: 73–82.
26.
TinkerJ.N.1973“Intermarriage and Ethnic Boundaries: The Japanese American Case,”Journal of Social Issues, 29: 49–66.
27.
U.S. Bureau of the Census1985Marital Characteristics. 1980 Census of Population Subject Reports.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
28.
U.S. Bureau of the Census1983Public- Use Microdata Samples Technical Documentation, Census of Population and Housing: 1980.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
29.
U.S. Bureau of the Census19721970 Census of Population: Marital Status. Subject Reports.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
30.
U.S. Bureau of the Census19661960 Census of Population: Marital Status. Subject Reports.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
31.
WilsonB.F.1983“Interracial and Intraracial Marriages in the Marriage-Registration Area, 1968–1980.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Regional Demographic Group. Chattanooga, TN.
32.
WongM.1988“A Look at Intermarriage among the Chinese in the United States in 1980.” Paper presented at the Conference on Race and Ethnic Relations in the 1990s, February 11–12. College Station: Texas A&M University.
33.
WongM.1986“Post-1965 Asian Immigrants: Where Do They Come From, Where Are They Now, and Where Are They Going?”The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 487: 150–168.
34.
YuanD.Y.1980“Significant Demographic Characteristics of Chinese Who Intermarry in the U.S.,”California Sociologist, 3(2): 184–96.
