Research has extensively explored the ad hoc nature of forced migration governance in India, with scholars arguing that India has tended to take a different approach to different asylum-seeking groups. Recent research also highlights how policy toward a single refugee group can shift drastically over time. What does this fragmentation and ad hocism mean for the everyday life of refugee and asylum-seeking communities? How does it affect the lived experience of refuge and protection in India? This article tackles these questions by examining the case of the Rohingya refugees in India—once granted official Long Term Visas as asylum seekers in 2012, now marked for detention and deportation as illegal immigrants in 2025. Drawing from fieldwork conducted with refugees, community leaders, and NGOs working across the country, this article examines how the combination of fragmented (forced) migration governance and divergent settlement patterns of the Rohingya in India has resulted in a form of fragmented protection, marked by different degrees of negotiated access to services such as health and education. At the same time, the precarity of the Rohingyas’ legal status in India (as UNHCR card-holders who are simultaneously deemed illegal by the Indian government) profoundly influences the operational space and potential impact of this fragmented protection. I show how fragmented protection is increasingly shaped by structural shocks including the political (negative government stance on refugees), the discursive (growing negative public perception of the Rohingya), and the administrative (drives toward all-encompassing digital identification schemes inhibiting the space for policy discretion).
AbbasT.HemadriR.. 2022. “Rohingya Refugees in India.” In Routledge Handbook of Refugees in India, edited by RajanIrudaya, 357–68. India: Routledge.
2.
AhmedZ. S.2019. “Managing the Refugee Crises in South Asia: The Role of SAARC.” Asian and Pacific Migration Journal28 (2): 210–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0117196819837044.
AnilD.2022. “The Rohingya Refugees in Hyderabad.” In Routledge Handbook of Refugees in India, edited by RajanIrudaya, 383–96. India: Routledge.
6.
AnsarA.2020. “The Unfolding of Belonging, Exclusion and Exile: A Reflection on the History of Rohingya Refugee Crisis in Southeast Asia.” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs40 (3): 441–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2020.1819126.
BasavapatnaS.2018. “Where do #IBelong? The Stateless Rohingya in India.” In The Rohingya in South Asia: People Without a State, edited by Ray ChaudhuryS. B.SamaddarR.. 43–73. India. Routledge Publications.
9.
BhadraA.2023. “Educational Aspirations Among the Rohingya: The Stateless in a Refugee Camp in India.” In Education for Refugees and Forced Immigrants Across Time and Context, edited by WisemanAlexanderDamaschke-DietrickLisa, 17–33. Emerald Publishing.
10.
BhatiaA.BhabhaJ.. 2017. “India’s Aadhaar Scheme and the Promise of Inclusive Social Protection.” Oxford Development Studies45 (1): 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2016.1263726.
BiehlK.2015. “Governing Through Uncertainty: Experiences of Being a Refugee in Turkey as a Country for Temporary Asylum.” Social Analysis59 (1): 57–75. https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2015.590104.
15.
BlochN.2021. “Refugees as Donors: ‘Rich’ Tibetan Refugees, Evicted Indian Slum Dwellers and a Smart City.” Journal of Refugee Studies34 (2): 1840–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fez106.
16.
BrinhamN.JoharA.. 2024. “Refugee Experiences of Identity Documents and Digitisation in India and Myanmar.” Forced Migration Review73: 8–12.
ChakravartiM.2018. “Rohingya in Bangladesh and India and the Media Planet.” In The Rohingyas in South Asia: People Without State, edited by ChaudhuryRayBasuSabyasachiSamaddarRanabir, 109–33. Routledge Publications India.
ChaudhuriB.KönigL.. 2018. “The Aadhaar Scheme: A Cornerstone of a new Citizenship Regime in India?” Contemporary South Asia26 (2): 127–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2017.1369934.
21.
ChimniB. S.2003. “Status of Refugees in India: Strategic Ambiguity.” In Refugees and the State: Practices of Asylum and Care in India (1947–2000), edited by SamaddarRanabir, 443–79. Sage Publications India.
22.
ChowdhoryN.PoyilS. T.. 2022. “At the Margins: Sri Lankan Tamil Refugee Women in Camps in Tamil Nadu.” In Routledge Handbook of Refugees in India, edited by RajanIrudaya, 612–27. India: Routledge.
Dutt TiwariA.JoharA.FieldJ.. 2024. “The Illegalisation of Rohingya Refugees in India: A (Non)Citizenship Crisis Promoted by Law and Policy.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies50 (19): 4905–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2024.2376414.
25.
FieldJ.BurraS.. 2020. The Global Compact on Refugees: Indian Perspectives and Experiences. 1st ed. New Delhi, India: UNHCR India and Academicians Working Group.
26.
FieldJ.PanditA.RajdevM.. 2021. “Coping Practices and Gender Relations: Rohingya Refugee Forced Migrations From Myanmar to India.” Gender, Place & Culture30 (3): 329–49. http://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2021.1997938.
27.
FieldJ.TiwariA.MookherjeeY.. 2017. “Urban refugees in Delhi: Identity, entitlements and well-being”. IIED Human Settlements Group Working Paper.
28.
FieldJ.TiwariA.MookherjeeY.. 2020. “Self-reliance as a Concept and a Spatial Practice for Urban Refugees: Reflections from Delhi, India.” Journal of Refugee Studies33 (1): 167–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fez050.
HorstCindyGrabskaKatarzyna. 2015. “Flight and Exile—Uncertainty in the Context of Conflict-Induced Displacement.” Social Analysis59 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2015.590101.
KihatoC.LandauLoren B.. September 2017. “Stealth Humanitarianism: Negotiating Politics, Precarity and Performance Management in Protecting the Urban Displaced.” Journal of Refugee Studies30 (3): 407–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/few031.
35.
LinR.2022. “The Privileged Refugees: Questions on Tibetan Nationality and Citizenship.” In Routledge Handbook of Refugees in India, edited by RajanIrudaya, 553–64. India: Routledge.
36.
MaasF.MünchS.SchaderM.SchammannH.. 2021. “The Politics of Uncertainty: Producing, Reinforcing, and Mediating (Legal) Uncertainty in Local Refugee Reception—Introduction to the Special Issue.” Journal of Refugee Studies34 (4): 3559–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feab064.
MapleN.2024. Refugee Reception in Southern Africa: National and Local Policies in Zambia and South Africa. London: University of London Press. https://doi.org/10.14296/wmpx9915.
MitraR.2023a. “ Ethnographic Tool(kit)s in Practice: Navigating Fieldwork with Refugee Populations in India”. IMISCOE PhD Blog Special Issue, 2024: Towards Engaged Migration Research: Unpacking Positionality, Inequality, and Access, 37–41. Retrieved from https://www.imiscoe.org/news-and-blog/phd-blog/2077-imiscoe-phd-network-blog-group.
42.
MitraA.2023b. “How Refugees Work Together: The Politics of Solidarity and ‘Invisible’ Collective Action During COVID-19.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies50 (12): 2899–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2191158.
43.
MitraR.2024. “From the Translocal to the Multi-sited Transnational: Tracing Rohingya Refugee Networks in India” Global Networks. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12494.
MitraR.Sahin-MencütekZ.. 2024. “Bargaining (In)Visibility: Rohingya Refugees and the Politics of Visibility in India.” Journal of Refugee Studies, 37 (3): 716–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feae049.
46.
MohantyB.2022. “Media Representation of Rohingya Refugees.” In Routledge Handbook of Refugees in India, edited by RajanIrudaya, 825–42. India: Routledge.
47.
MorandM.CrispJ.. 2013. Destination Delhi: A Review of the Implementation of UNHCR’s Urban Refugee Policy in India’s Capital City. Policy Development and Evaluation Service, UNHCR. Retrieved from: https://www.refworld.org/policy/strategy/unhcr/2013/en/95609.
48.
MorettiS.2021. “Southeast Asia and the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees: Substance Without Form?” International Journal of Refugee Law33 (2): 214–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeab035.
49.
MuntarbhornV.2021. “Regional Refugee Regimes: Southeast Asia.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Refugee Law, Oxford Handbooks, edited by CostelloCathrynFosterMichelleMcAdamJane, 423–40. online edn, Oxford Academic. 9 June 2021, https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198848639.003.0024, accessed 21 Feb. 2025.
50.
NewmanP.2022. “Sri Lankan Refugees: A Voiceless, Undignified Existence.” In Routledge Handbook of Refugees in India, edited by RajanIrudaya, 628–41. India: Routledge.
51.
NormanK.2017. “Ambivalence as Policy: Consequences for Refugees in Egypt.” Égypte/Monde Arabe1 (15): 27–45. https://doi.org/10.4000/ema.3663.
52.
OomenB.BaumgärtelM.MielletS.DurmusE.SabchevT.. 2021. “Strategies of Divergence: Local Authorities, Law, and Discretionary Spaces in Migration Governance.” Journal of Refugee Studies34 (4): 3608–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feab062.
PaliwalA.2022. “Politics, Strategy, and State Responses to Conflict-Generated Migration: Evidence from India.” Journal of Global Security Studies7 (1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogab032.
RamachandranS.2019. ‘The Contours of Crimmigration Control in India’. Global Detention Project Working Paper No. 25. Global Detention Project.
62.
RamasubramanyamJ.2020. “Subcontinental Defiance to the Global Refugee Regime: Global Leadership or Regional Exceptionalism?” In Asian Yearbook of International Law. 60-79. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004437784_005.
63.
RamasubramanyamJ.2021. “Regional Refugee Regimes: South Asia.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Refugee Law, Oxford Handbooks, edited by CostelloCathrynFosterMichelleMcAdamJane, 407–22. online edn, Oxford Academic. 9 June 2021, https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198848639.003.0023
64.
RatherW.2022. “Rohingya Refugees in Jammu: Analysis of Socio-Economic and Demographic Conditions.” In Routledge Handbook of Refugees in India, edited by RajanIrudaya, 466–75. India: Routledge.
Şahin-MencütekZ.Gökalp-ArasE.Ayhan KayaA.RottmannS.. 2023. Syrian Refugees in Turkey: Between Reception and Integration. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
67.
SarkerS. P.BhattacharyaS.. 2022. “Where Kindness Is Calculated: Refugee Regimes in South Asia.” Indonesian Journal of International Law19 (3): 425–54. Available at: https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/ijil/vol19/iss3/4.
68.
SenS.2003. “Paradoxes of the International Regime of Care: The Role of the UNHCR in India.” In Refugees and State: Practices of Asylum and Care in India 1947–2000, edited by SamaddarRanabir, 396–442. Sage Publications India.
69.
ShamshadR.2017. Bangladeshi Migrants in India: Foreigners, Refugees, or Infiltrators. Oxford University Press.
Valcárcel SilvelaA.2019. “Sri Lankan Tamil Refugees in India: Return or Integration?” Forced Migration Review 62: 13–15.
77.
VelathP.ChopraK.. 2018. “The Stateless People: Rohingya in Hyderabad.” In The Rohingya in South Asia: People Without a State, edited by Ray ChaudhuryS. B.SamaddarR., 74–91. India: Routledge Publications.
