This article examines the role of party system polarization in shaping immigrants’ party loyalties in their host country. It suggests that foreign-born individuals are more likely to become partisans when political parties take more distinct policy positions on immigration control. Moreover, this relationship is more pronounced among foreign-born non-citizens than foreign-born citizens. Using individual-level public opinion data from eight rounds of the European Social Survey (ESS), 2002–2017, and measures of party system polarization constructed using party policy positions from the Chapel Hill Expert Survey (CHES) in 17 West European democracies, the analyses confirm these expectations. The findings presented here suggest that party polarization on immigration control enhances, rather than undermines, immigrant political integration in contemporary democracies.
Abou-ChadiT.2016. “Political and Institutional Determinants of Immigration Policies.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies42 (13): 2087–110.
2.
AbrajanoM. A.AlvarezR. M.. 2010. New Faces, New Voices: The Hispanic Electorate in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
AdamsJ. F.MerrillS.IIIGrofmanB.. 2005. A Unified Theory of Party Competition: A Cross-national Analysis Integrating Spatial and Behavioral Factors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
AlonsoS.da FonsecaS. C.. 2012. “Immigration, Left and Right.” Party Politics18 (6): 865–84.
5.
AlvarezM. R.García BedollaL.. 2003. “The Foundations of Latino Voter Partisanship: Evidence from the 2000 Election.” The Journal of Politics65 (1): 31–49.
6.
AptekarS.2016. “Making Sense of Naturalization: What Citizenship Means to Naturalizing Immigrants in Canada and the USA.” Journal of International Migration and Integration17 (4): 1143–61.
7.
BakkerR.EdwardsE.HoogheL.JollyS.KoedamJ.KostelkaF.MarksG.PolkJ.RovnyJ.SchumacherG.SteenbergenM.VachudovaM.ZilovicM.. 2015. “1999–2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File.” Version 1.13. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.
8.
BakkerR.JollyS.PolkJ.. 2012. “Complexity in the European Party Space: Exploring Dimensionality with Experts.” European Union Politics13 (2): 219–45.
9.
BalistreriK. S.Van HookJ.. 2004. “The More Things Change the More They Stay the Same: Mexican Naturalization Before and After Welfare Reform.” International Migration Review38 (1): 113–30.
10.
BatesonR.2012. “Crime Victimization and Political Participation.” American Political Science Review106 (3): 570–87.
11.
BerghJ.BjørklundT.. 2011. “The Revival of Group Voting: Explaining Voting Preferences of Immigrants in Norway.” Political Studies59 (2): 308–27.
12.
BerryW. D.GolderM.MiltonD.. 2012. “Improving Tests of Theories Positing Interaction.” The Journal of Politics74 (3): 653–71.
13.
BirdK.SaalfeldT.WüstA. M., eds. 2011. The Political Representation of Immigrants and Minorities. London and New York: Routledge.
14.
BirkvadS. R.2019. “Immigrant Meanings of Citizenship: Mobility, Stability, and Recognition.” Citizenship Studies23 (8): 798–814.
15.
BloemraadI.KortewegA.YurdakulG.. 2008. “Citizenship and Immigration: Multiculturalism, Assimilation, and Challenges to the Nation-State.” Annual Review of Sociology34: 153–79.
16.
BowlerS.NicholsonS. P.SeguraG. M.. 2006. “Earthquakes and Aftershocks: Race, Direct Democracy, and Partisan Change.” American Journal of Political Science50 (1): 146–59.
17.
BraakmannN.WaqasM.WildmanJ.. 2017. “Are Immigrants in Favor of Immigration? Evidence from England and Wales.” The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy17 (1): 1–16.
18.
BrantonR.2007. “Latino Attitudes toward Various Areas of Public Policy: The Importance of Acculturation.” Political Research Quarterly60 (2): 293–303.
19.
BrockingtonD.2009. “It’s About the Benefits: Choice Environments, Ideological Proximity and Individual Participation in 28 Democracies.” Party Politics15 (4): 435–54.
20.
BudgeI.CreweI.FarlieD. J.. 1976. Party Identification and Beyond. New York: John Wiley.
21.
BurnsN.SchlozmanK. L.VerbaS.. 1997. “The Public Consequences of Private Inequality: Family Life and Citizen Participation.” American Political Science Review91 (2): 373–89.
22.
CainB. E.KiewietD. R.UhlanerC. J.. 1991. “The Acquisition of Partisanship by Latinos and Asian Americans.” American Journal of Political Science35 (2): 390–422.
23.
Calhoun-BrownA.1996. “African American Churches and Political Mobilization: The Psychological Impact of Organizational Resources.” The Journal of Politics58 (4): 935–53.
24.
CampbellA.ConverseP. E.MillerW. E.StokesD. E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Willey.
25.
CarminesE. G.StimsonJ. A.. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
ChoS.EndersbyJ. W.. 2003. “Issues, the Spatial Theory of Voting, and British General Elections: A Comparison of Proximity and Directional Models.” Public Choice114 (3–4): 275–93.
27.
CollingwoodL.BarretoM. A.Garcia-RiosS. I.. 2014. “Revisiting Latino Voting: Cross-Racial Mobilization in the 2012 Election.” Political Research Quarterly67 (3): 632–45.
28.
CoxG.1990. “Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems.” American Journal of Political Science34 (4): 905–35.
29.
CuriniL.HinoA.. 2012. “Missing Links in Party-System Polarization: How Institutions and Voters Matter.” The Journal of Politics74 (2): 460–73.
30.
CzaikaM.de HaasH.. 2015. “The Globalization of Migration: Has the World Become More Migratory?” International Migration Review48 (2): 283–323.
31.
DahlbergS.2013. “Does Context Matter – The Impact of Electoral Systems, Political Parties and Individual Characteristics on Voters’ Perceptions of Party Positions.” Electoral Studies32 (4): 670–83.
32.
DaltonR. J.2008. “The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems.” Comparative Political Studies41 (7): 899–920.
33.
DaltonR. J.Van SickleA.WeldonS.. 2010. “The Individual-Institutional Nexus of Protest Behavior.” British Journal of Political Science40 (1): 51–73.
34.
DancygierR.MargalitY.. 2019. “The Evolution of the Immigration Debate: Evidence from a New Dataset of Party Positions over the Last Half-Century.” Comparative Political Studies53 (5): 734–74.
35.
DancygierR.SaundersE. N.. 2006. “A New Electorate? Comparing Preferences and Partisanship between Immigrants and Natives.” American Journal of Political Science50 (4): 962–81.
36.
DassonnevilleR.McAllisterI.. 2020. “The Party Choice Set and Satisfaction with Democracy.” West European Politics43 (1): 49–73.
37.
DavisO. A.HinichM. J.OrdeshookP. C.. 1970. “An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process.” American Political Science Review64 (2): 426–48.
38.
de RooijE. A.2012. “Patterns of Immigrant Political Participation: Explaining Differences in Types of Political Participation Between Immigrants and the Majority Population in Western Europe.” European Sociological Review28 (4): 455–81.
39.
DinasE.Pardos-PradoS.. 2012. “A Hidden Giant? Exploring the Centrifugal Dynamics of Attitudes towards the European Unification.” Acta Politica47 (4): 378–99.
40.
DionneE. J.1991. Why Americans Hate Politics. New York: Touchstone.
41.
DonnalojaV. 2020. “British and Disengaged: National Identification and Political Engagement Before and After Naturalization.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies46 (13): 2723–41.
42.
DownsA.1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
43.
DuncanF.van HeckeS.. 2008. “Immigration and the Transnational European Center-Right: A Common Programmatic Response?” Journal of European Public Policy15 (3): 432–52.
44.
EnelowJ. M.HinichM. J.. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
45.
EnsleyM. J.2007. “Candidate Divergence, Ideology, and Vote Choice in U.S. Senate Elections.” American Politics Research35 (1): 103–22.
46.
FiorinaM. P.1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
47.
FranklinC. H.JacksonJ. E.. 1983. “The Dynamics of Party Identification.” American Political Science Review77 (4): 957–73.
48.
FryeT.2002. “The Perils of Polarization: Economic Performance in the Postcommunist World.” World Politics54 (3): 308–37.
49.
FuchsD.KlingemannH.-D.. 1989. “The Left-Right Schema.” In Continuities in Political Action: A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies, edited by JenningsM. K.van DethJ. W.BarnesS.H.FuchsD.HeunksF.J.InglehartR.KaaseM.KlingemannH.-D.ThomassenJ. A., 203–34. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
50.
GabelM.2000. “European Integration, Voters, and National Politics.” West European Politics23 (4): 52–72.
51.
GilbertsonG.SingerA.. 2003. “The Emergence of Protective Citizenship in the USA: Naturalization among Dominican Immigrants in the Post-1996 Welfare Reform Era.” Ethnic and Racial Studies26 (1): 25–51.
52.
GiugniMarcoGrassoMaria. 2020. “Trust, Identity, Skills, or Recruitment? Assessing Four Explanations of the Relationships between Associational Involvement and the Political Participation of Migrants.” International Migration Review54 (2): 585–610.
53.
GivensT.LuedtkeA.. 2005. “European Immigration Policies in Comparative Perspective: Issue Salience, Partisanship and Immigrant Rights.” Comparative European Politics3 (1): 1–22.
54.
GreenD.PalmquistB.SchicklerE.. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
55.
Green-PedersenC.KrogstrupJ.. 2008. “Immigration as a Political Issue in Denmark and Sweden.” European Journal of Political Research47 (5): 610–34.
56.
Green-PedersenC.OdmalmP.. 2008. “Going Different Ways? Right-wing Parties and The Immigrant Issue in Denmark and Sweden.” Journal of European Public Policy15 (3): 367–81.
57.
HajnalZ.LeeT.. 2011. Why Americans Don’t Join the Party: Race, Immigration, and The Failure (of Political Parties) to Engage the Electorate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
HardingR.2011. “Freedom to Choose and Democracy: The Empirical Question.” Economics and Philosophy27 (3): 221–45.
59.
HarpazY.MateosP.. 2019. “Strategic Citizenship: Negotiating Membership in the Age of Dual Nationality.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies45 (6): 843–57.
60.
HeathA.F.FisherS. D.SandersD.. Sobolewska. MM. 2011. “Ethnic Heterogeneity in the Social Bases of Voting at the 2010 British General Election.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties21 (2): 255–77.
61.
HelblingM.2014. “Framing Immigration in Western Europe.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies40 (1): 21–41.
62.
HellwigT.MikulskaA.GezgorB.. 2010. “Perceptions of Policy Choice in Contemporary Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research49 (6): 705–30.
63.
HetheringtonM. J.2007. “Turned Off or Turned On: The Effects of Polarization on Political Participation, Engagement, and Representation.” In Red and Blue Nation? Volume II—Consequences and Correction of America’s Polarized Politics, edited by NivolaP. S.BradyD. W., 1–33. Washington, DC/Stanford, CA: Brookings Inst. Press and Hoover Inst. Press.
64.
HetheringtonM. J.2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review95 (3): 619–31.
65.
HibbingJ.R.Theiss-MorseE.. 2002. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs About How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
HibbingJ.R.. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes Toward American Political Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
67.
HolmbergS.1994. “Party Identification Compared Across the Atlantic.” In Elections at Home and Abroad. Essays in Honor of Warren E. Miller, edited by JenningsM. K.MannT. E., 93–121. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
68.
HolmbergS.. 2003. “Are Political Parties Necessary?” Electoral Studies22 (2): 287–99.
69.
HoogheL.MarksG.. 2018. “Cleavage Theory Meets Europe’s Crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the Transnational Cleavage.” Journal of European Public Policy25 (1): 109–35.
70.
HoogheL.BakkerR.BrigewichA.de VriesC. E.EdwardsE. E.MarksG.RovnyJ.VachudovaM. R.. 2010. “Reliability and Validity of Measuring Party Positions: The Chapel Hill Expert Surveys of 2002 and 2006.” European Journal of Political Research49 (5): 687–703.
71.
HuberJ.InglehartR.. 1995. “Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies.” Party Politics1 (1): 73–111.
72.
HuddyL.MasonL.HorwitzS. N.. 2016. “Political Identity Convergence: On Being Latino, Becoming a Democrat, and Getting Active.” RSF2 (3): 205–28.
73.
HungerS.2018. “No Naturalization, No Participation? The Influence of Citizenship Regimes and Naturalization on Immigrants’Political Participation.” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft12 (1): 279–96.
74.
IversenT.1994. “The Logics of Electoral Politics: Spatial, Directional, and Mobilizational Effects.” Comparative Political Studies27 (2): 155–89.
75.
IyengarS. S.LepperM. R.. 1999. “Rethinking the Value of Choice: A Cultural Perspective on Intrinsic Motivation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology76 (3): 349–66.
76.
IyengarS. S.. 2000. “When Choice is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology79 (6): 995–1006.
77.
JacobsonG. C.2005. “Polarized Politics and the 2004 Congressional and Presidential Elections.” Political Science Quarterly120 (2): 199–218.
78.
JenningsM. K.1983. “Gender Roles and Inequalities in Political Participation: Results from an Eight-nation Study.” Western Political Quarterly36 (3): 364–85.
79.
JiangL.2016. “Valence Politics and Immigrant Voting in the 2013 Australian Election.” Australian Journal of Political Science51 (3): 418–35.
80.
JiménezT.2007. “Weighing the Costs and Benefits of Mexican Immigration: the Mexican-American Perspective.” Social Sciences Quarterly88 (3): 599–618.
81.
JonesD. R.2001. “Party Polarization and Legislative Gridlock.” Political Research Quarterly54 (1): 125–41.
82.
Jones-CorreaM.Al-FahamM. HCortezD. 2018. “Political (Mis)behavior: Attention and Lacunae in the Study of Latino Politics.” Annual Review of Sociology44: 213–35.
83.
Jones-CorreaM.LealD. L.. 2001. “Political Participation: Does Religion Matter?” Political Research Quarterly54 (4): 751–70.
JunnJ.MasuokaN.. 2008. “Asian American Identity: Shared Racial Status and Political Context.” Perspectives on Politics6 (4): 729–40.
86.
JustA.2019. “Political Regimes and Immigrant Party Preferences.” Comparative Political Studies52 (2): 651–86.
87.
JustA.AndersonC. J.. 2012. “Immigrants, Citizenship, and Political Action in Europe.” The British Journal of Political Science42 (3): 481–509.
88.
JustA.. 2014. “Opinion Climates and Immigrant Political Action: A Cross-National Study of 25 European Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies47 (7): 935–65.
89.
JustA.. 2015. “Dual Allegiances? Immigrants’Attitudes toward Immigration.” The Journal of Politics77 (1): 188–201.
90.
JustA.SandoviciM. E.ListhaugO.. 2014. “Islam, Religiosity, and Immigrant Political Action in Western Europe.” Social Science Research43 (1): 127–44.
91.
KamC. D.ZechmeisterE. J.WilkingJ. R.. 2008. “From the Gap to the Chasm: Gender and Participation among Non-Hispanic Whites and Mexican Americans.” Political Research Quarterly61 (2): 205–18.
92.
KedarO.2005. “When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancing in Parliamentary Election.” American Political Science Review99 (2): 185–99.
93.
KingD. C.1997. “The Polarization of American Parties and Mistrust of Government.” In Why People Don’t Trust Government, edited by NyeJ. S.ZelikowP. D.KingD. C., 155–78. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
94.
KittilsonM. C.2009. “Research Resources in Comparative Political Behavior.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by DaltonR. J.KlingemannH.-D., 865–95. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
95.
KnollB. R.2012. “¿Compañero o Extranjero? Anti-Immigrant Nativism among Latino Americans.” Social Science Quarterly93 (4): 911–31.
96.
KriesiH.GrandeE.DolezalM.HelblingM.HöglingerD.HutterS.WüestB.. 2012. Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
97.
LaaksoM.TaageperaR.. 1979. “Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies12 (1): 3–27.
98.
LachatR.2008. “The Impact of Party Polarization on Ideological Voting.” Electoral Studies27 (4): 687–98.
99.
LaymanG. C.CarseyT. M.HorowitzJ. M.. 2006. “Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science9: 83–110.
100.
LipsetS. M.RokkanS.. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.
101.
LupuN.2013. “Party Brands and Partisanship: Theory with Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Argentina.” American Journal of Political Science57 (1): 49–64.
102.
LupuN.. 2015. “Party Polarization and Mass Partisanship: A Comparative Perspective.” Political Behavior37 (2): 331–56.
103.
LupuN.RiedlR. B.. 2013. “Political Parties and Uncertainty in Developing Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies46 (11): 1339–65.
104.
MacdonaldS. E.ListhaugO.RabinowitzG.. 1991. “Issues and Party Support in Multiparty Systems.” American Political Science Review85 (4): 1107–31.
105.
MarksG.HoogheL.SteenbergenM. R.BakkerR.. 2007. ‘‘Crossvalidating Data on Party Positioning on European Integration.”Electoral Studies26 (1): 23–38.
106.
MarksG.HoogheL.NelsonM.EdwardsE.. 2006. “Party Competition and European Integration in the East and West: Different Structure, Same Causality.” Comparative Political Studies39 (2): 155–75.
107.
MaxwellR.2010. “Evaluating Integration: Political Attitudes across Migrant Generations in Europe.” International Migration Review44 (1): 25–52.
108.
McCannJ. A.Nishikawa ChávezK. A.. 2016. “Partisanship by Invitation: Immigrants Respond to Political Campaigns.” The Journal of Politics78 (4): 1196–210.
109.
MoralM.2016. “The Passive-Aggressive Voter: The Calculus of Casting and Invalid Votes in European Democracies.” Political Research Quarterly69 (4): 732–45.
110.
MoralM.. 2017. “The Bipolar Voter: On the Effects of Actual and Perceived Party Polarization on Voter Turnout in European Multiparty Democracies.” Political Behavior39 (4): 935–65.
111.
NiemiR. G.PowellG. B.JrStanleyH. W.EvansC. L.. 1985. “Testing the Converse Partisanship Model with New Electorates.” Comparative Political Studies18 (3): 300–22.
112.
PantojaA. D.RamirezR.SeguraG. M.. 2001. “Citizens by Choice, Voters by Necessity: Patterns in Political Mobilization by Naturalized Latinos.” Political Research Quarterly54 (4): 729–50.
113.
Pardos-PradoS.LanceeB.SagarzazuI.. 2014. “Immigration and Electoral Change in Mainstream Political Space.” Political Behavior36 (4): 847–75.
114.
PogonyiS.2019. “The Passport as Means of Identity Management: Making and Unmaking Ethnic Boundaries through Citizenship.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies45 (6): 975–93.
115.
PolkJ.RovnyJ.BakkerR.EdwardsE.HoogheL.JollyS.KoedamJ.KostelkaF.MarksG.SchumacherG.SteenbergenM.VaduchovaM.ZilovicM.. 2017. “Explaining the Salience of Anti-elitism and Reducing Political Corruption for Political Parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey Data.” Research and Politics4 (1): 1–9.
116.
PrzeworskiA.2003. “Freedom to Choose and Democracy.” Economics and Philosophy19 (2): 265–79.
117.
RabinowitzG.MacdonaldS. E.. 1989. “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review83 (1): 93–121.
118.
RouseS. M.WilkinsonB. C.GarandJ. C.. 2010. “Divided Loyalties? Understanding Variation in Latino Attitudes toward Immigration.” Social Science Quarterly91 (3): 856–82.
119.
RöderA.MühlauP.. 2011. “Discrimination, Exclusion and Immigrants’Confidence in Public Institutions in Europe.” European Societies13 (4): 535–57.
120.
RuedinD.MoralesL.. 2019. “Estimating Party Positions on Immigration: Assessing the Reliability and Validity of Different Methods.” Party Politics25 (3): 303–14.
121.
SandersD.HeathA.FisherS.SobolewskaM.. 2014. “The Calculus of Ethnic Minority Voting in Britain.” Political Studies62 (2): 230–51.
122.
SartoriG.1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
123.
SchildkrautD. J.2013. “The Complicated Constituency: A Study of Immigrant Opinions about Political Representation.” Politics, Groups, and Identities1 (1): 26–47.
124.
SearsD. O.DanboldF.ZavalaV. M.. 2016. “Incorporation of Latino Immigrants into the American Party System.” RSF2 (3): 183–204.
125.
SenA.1988. “Freedom of Choice: Concept and Content.” European Economic Review32 (2–3): 269–94.
126.
SigelmanL.YoughS. N.. 1978. “Left-right Polarization in National Party Systems: A Cross-National Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies11 (3): 355–79.
127.
SteenbergenM. R.JonesB. S.. 2002. “Modeling Multilevel Data Structures.” American Journal of Political Science46 (1): 218–37.
128.
SteenbergenM. R.MarksG.. 2007. “Evaluating Expert Judgements.” European Journal of Political Research46 (3): 347–66.
129.
StreetA.Zepeda-MillánC.Jones-CorreaM.. 2015. “Mass Deportations and the Future of Latino Partisanship.” Social Science Quarterly96 (2): 540–52.
130.
StrijbisO.2014. “Migration Background and Voting Behavior in Switzerland: A Socio-Psychological Explanation.” Swiss Political Science Review20 (4): 612–31.
131.
StrijbisOliverPolaviejaJavier. 2018. “Immigrants against Immigration: Competition, Identity and Immigrants’Vote on Free Movement in Switzerland.” Electoral Studies56: 150–57.
132.
TaylorM.HermanV. M.. 1971. “Party Systems and Governmental Stability.” American Political Science Review65 (1): 28–37.
133.
TeneyC.JacobsD.ReaA.DelwitP.. 2010. “Ethnic Voting in Brussels: Voting Patterns Among Ethnic Minorities in Brussels (Belgium) during the 2006 Local Elections.” Acta Politica45 (3): 273–97.
134.
UrsoO.2018. “The Politicization of Immigration in Italy. Who Frames the Issue, When and How.” Italian Political Science Review48 (3): 365–81.
135.
van der BrugW.D’AmatoG.BerkhoutJ.RuedinD.. 2015. The Politicisation of Migration. Abingdon: Routledge.
136.
van der BrugW.van SpanjeJ.. 2009. “Immigration, Europe and the “New” Cultural Cleavage.” European Journal of Political Research48 (3): 308–34.
137.
van SpanjeJ.2010. “Contagious Parties: Anti-Immigration Parties and their Impact on Other Parties’Immigration Stances in Contemporary Western Europe.” Party Politics16 (5): 563–86.
138.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E.. 1995. Voice and Equality. Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
139.
VerbaS.NieN. H.KimJ.. 1971. The Modes of Democratic Participation: A Cross-national Comparison. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
140.
VoicuB.ŞerbanM.. 2012. “Immigrant Involvement in Voluntary Associations in Europe.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies38 (10): 1569–87.
141.
WesselsB.SchmittH.. 2008. “Meaningful Choices, Political Supply, and Institutional Effectiveness.” Electoral Studies27 (1): 19–30.
142.
WestlakeD.2018. “Multiculturalism, Political Parties, and the Conflicting Pressures of Ethnic Minorities and Far-Right Parties.” Party Politics24 (4): 421–33.
143.
WhiteS.NevitteN.BlaisA.GidengilE.FournierP.. 2008. “The Political Resocialization of Immigrants: Resistance of Lifelong Learning?” Political Research Quarterly61 (2): 268–81.
144.
WongJ. S.2000. “The Effects of Age and Political Exposure on the Development of Party Identification among Asian American and Latino Immigrants in the United States.” Political Behavior22 (4): 341–71.
145.
WrightM.BloemraadI.. 2012. “Is There a Trade-off Between Multiculturalism and Socio-political Integration? Policy Regimes and Immigrant Incorporation in Comparative Perspective.” Perspectives on Politics10 (1): 77–95.
146.
WüstA.M.2004. “Naturalized Citizens as Voters: Behavior and Impact.” German Politics13 (2): 341–59.
147.
WüstA.M.. 2000. “New Citizens — New Voters? Political Preferences and Voting Intentions of Naturalized Germans: A Case Study in Progress.” International Migration Review34 (2): 569–67.
148.
YangA.de la GarzaR. O.. 2017. “Americanizing Latinos, Latinoizing America: The Political Consequences of Latino Incorporation.” Social Science Quarterly98 (2): 690–727.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
