This article investigates destination language proficiency upon arrival and subsequent proficiency growth among recently arrived immigrants in Germany, Great Britain, and Ireland. We introduce selectivity considerations to a model of language acquisition, arguing that positively selected individuals should display higher levels of language skills upon arrival and faster growth in destination language proficiency thereafter. The results show that upon arrival, positively selected immigrants are less proficient, holding absolute levels of educational attainment constant. In terms of language proficiency growth, however, our longitudinal findings suggest that positively selected immigrants, net of differences in pre-migration investments, post-migration exposure, and incentives, acquire the destination language faster. The findings add to a growing body of literature demonstrating the benefits of using novel measurement approaches to migrant selectivity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbaR.SloanJ.SperlingJ.. 2011. “The Integration Imperative: The Children of Low-Status Immigrants in the Schools of Wealthy Societies.” Annual Review of Sociology37:395–415.
2.
AzzoliniD.SchnellP.PalmerJ. R. B.. 2012. “Educational Achievement Gaps between Immigrant and Native Students in Two ‘New’ Immigration Countries: Italy and Spain in Comparison.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science643:46–77.
3.
BarroR. J.LeeJ. W.. 2013. “A New Data Set of Educational Attainment in the World, 1950–2010.” Journal of Development Economics104:184–98.
4.
BelotM. V. K.HattonT. J.. 2012. “Immigrant Selection in the OECD.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics114(4):1105–28.
5.
BorjasG. J.1987. “Self-Selection and the Earnings of Immigrants.” American Economic Review77(4):531–53.
6.
ChiswickB. R.MillerP. W.. 1995. “The Endogeneity between Language and Earnings: International Analyses.” Journal of Labor Economics13(2):246–88.
7.
ChiswickB. R.MillerP. W.. 2001. “A Model of Destination-Language Acquisition: Application to Male Immigrants in Canada.” Demography38(3):391–409.
8.
Cobb-ClarkD. A.1993. “Immigrant Selectivity and Wages: The Evidence for Women.” American Economic Review83(4):986–993.
9.
De SwaanA.2001. Words of the World: The Global Language System. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
10.
DiehlC.GijsbertsM.GuveliA.KoenigM.KristenC.LubbersM.McGinnityF.MühlauP.PlattL.. 2015. “Causes and Consequences of Socio-Cultural Integration Processes of New Immigrants in Europe (SCIP).” ZA5956 Data file Version 1.0.0. Cologne: GESIS Data Archive.
11.
DiehlC.LubbersM.MühlauP.PlattL.. 2016. “Starting Out: New Migrants’ Socio-Cultural Integration Trajectories in Four European Destinations.” Ethnicities16(2):157–79.
12.
DronkersJ.de HeusM.. 2009. “Negative Selectivity of Europe’s Guest-Worker Immigration?” MPRA Paper 22213, Munich.
13.
DuckworthA.2016. Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance. New York, NY: Scribner.
14.
DuffP. A.WongP.EarlyM.. 2002. “Learning Language for Work and Life: The Linguistic Socialization of Immigrant Canadians Seeking Careers in Healthcare.” Modern Language Journal86(3):397–422.
15.
DustmannC.FabbriF.. 2003. “Language Proficiency and Labour Market Performance of Immigrants in the UK.” Economic Journal113(489):695–717.
16.
DustmannC.Van SoestA.. 2001. “Language Fluency and Earnings: Estimation with Misclassified Language Indicators.” Review of Economics and Statistics83(4):663–74.
17.
EdeleA.SeuringJ.KristenC.StanatP.. 2015. “Why Bother with Testing? The Validity of Immigrants’ Self-Assessment of Language Proficiency.” Social Science Research52:99–123.
18.
EsserH.2006. “Migration, Language and Integration.” AKI Research Review 4. Berlin: Berlin Social Science Center.
GroggerJ.HansonG. H.. 2011. “Income Maximization and the Selection and Sorting of International Migrants.” Journal of Development Economics95(1):42–57.
27.
GuveliA.GanzeboomH. B. G.Baykara-KrummeH.PlattL.EroğluŞ.SpieringsN.BayrakdarS.NauckB.SozeriE. K.. 2017. “2,000 Families: Identifying the Research Potential of an Origins-of-Migration Study.” Ethnic and Racial Studies40(14):2558–76.
28.
IbarraranP.LubotskyD.. 2007. “Mexican Immigration and Self-Selection: New Evidence from the 2000 Mexican Census.” In Mexican Immigration to the United States, edited by BorjasG. J., 159–92. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
IchouM.2014. “Who They Were There: Immigrants’ Educational Selectivity and Their Children’s Educational Attainment.” European Sociological Review30(6):750–65.
30.
KristenC.MühlauP.SchachtD.. 2016. “Language Acquisition of Recently Arrived Immigrants in England, Germany, Ireland, and the Netherlands.” Ethnicities16(2):180–212.
31.
LeeE. S.1966. “A Theory of Migration.” Demography3(1):47–57.
32.
Lessard-PhillipsL.FleischmannF.van ElsasE.. 2014. “Ethnic Minorities in Ten Western Countries: Migration Flows, Policies and Institutional Differences.” In Unequal Attainments: Ethnic Educational Inequalities in Ten Western Countries, edited by HeathA. F.BrinbaumY., 25–61. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
LevelsM.DronkersJ.KraaykampG.. 2008. “Immigrant Children’s Educational Achievement in Western Countries: Origin, Destination, and Community Effects on Mathematical Performance.” American Sociological Review73(5):835–53.
34.
LiebersonS.1980. A Piece of the Pie: Blacks and White Immigrants since 1880. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
35.
MartinovicB.van TubergenF.MaasI.. 2009. “Dynamics of Interethnic Contact: A Panel Study of Immigrants in the Netherlands.” European Sociological Review25(3):303–18.
36.
PortesA.RumbautR. G.. 2006. Immigrant America: A Portrait. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
37.
QianX.SmythR.. 2008. “Measuring Regional Inequality of Education in China: Widening Coast–Inland Gap or Widening Rural–Urban Gap?” Journal of International Development20(2):132–44.
38.
RendallM. S.ParkerS. W.. 2014. “Two Decades of Negative Educational Selectivity of Mexican Migrants to the United States.” Population and Development Review40(3):421–46.
39.
RöderA.LubbersM.. 2015. “Attitudes towards Homosexuality amongst Recent Polish Migrants in Western Europe: Migrant Selectivity and Attitude Change.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies41(11):1858–84.
40.
SchnepfS. V.2007. “Immigrants’ Educational Disadvantage: An Examination across Ten Countries and Three Surveys.” Journal of Population Economics20(3):527–45.
UlubaşoğluM. A.CardakB. A.. 2007. “International Comparisons of Rural–Urban Educational Attainment: Data and Determinants.” European Economic Review51(7):1828–57.
43.
van de WerfhorstH. G.van ElsasE.HeathA. F.. 2014. “Origin and Destination Effects on the Educational Careers of Second-Generation Minorities.” In Unequal Attainments: Ethnic Educational Inequalities in Ten Western Countries, edited by HeathA. F.BrinbaumY., 245–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
van TubergenF.MaasI.FlapH.. 2004. “The Economic Incorporation of Immigrants in 18 Western Societies: Origin, Destination, and Community Effects.” American Sociological Review69(5):704–27.
45.
van TubergenF.MentjoxT.. 2014. “Minority Language Proficiency of Adolescent Immigrant Children in England, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden.” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie66(S1):241–62.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
