Using household surveys for 25 countries over a 12-year period, this paper investigates why the elderly are more averse to open immigration policies than their younger peers. We find that the negative correlation between age and pro-immigration attitudes is mostly explained by a cohort or generational change. In fact, once we control for year of birth, the correlation between age and pro-immigration attitudes is either positive or zero in most of the countries of our sample. Under certain assumptions, our estimates suggest that aging societies will tend to become less averse to open immigration regimes over time.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlwinD.KrosnickJ. A.. 1991. “Aging, Cohorts, and the Stability of Sociopolitical Orientations over the Life Span.” American Journal of Sociology97(1):169–95.
2.
AntmanF.McKenzieD. J.. 2007. “Earnings Mobility and Measurement Error: A Pseudo-panel Approach.” Economic Development and Cultural Change56(1):125–61.
3.
AristeiD.PeraliF.PieroniL.. 2008. “Cohort, Age and Time Effects in Alcohol Consumption by Italian Households: A Double-hurdle Approach.” Empirical Economics35(1):29–61.
4.
CalahorranoL. 2010. Aging and Immigration Policy in a Representative Democracy. No. 201018. MAGKS Joint Discussion Paper Series, Discussion Paper No. 18-2010 Marburg University: Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
5.
CalahorranoL. 2013. “Population Aging and Individual Attitudes Toward Immigration: Disentangling Age, Cohort and Time Effects.” Review of International Economics21(2):342–53.
6.
CardD.DustmannC.PrestonI.. 2012. “Immigration, Wages, and Compositional Amenities.” Journal of the European Economic Association10(1):78–119.
7.
CasaricoA.DevillanovaC.. 2003. “Social Security and Migration with Endogenous Skill Upgrading.” Journal of Public Economics87(3):773–97.
8.
CortesP.2008. “The Effect of Low-skilled Immigration on US Prices: Evidence from CPI Data.” Journal of Political Economy116(3):381–422.
9.
DeatonA. 1997. The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy. London, UK: World Bank by The Johns Hopkins University Press.
10.
DeatonAPaxsonChristina. 1994. “Intertemporal Choice and Inequality.” The Journal of Political Economy102(3):437–67.
11.
DeatonAPaxsonChristina1997. “The Effects of Economic and Population Growth on National Saving and Inequality.” Demography34(1):97–114.
12.
De MelloL.SchotteS.TiongsonE. R.WinklerH.. 2017. “Greying the Budget: Ageing and Preferences over Public Policies.” Kyklos70(1):70–96.
13.
European Commission. 2012. Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs. The 2012 Ageing Report. Brussels, Belgium: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
14.
FacchiniG.MaydaA. M.. 2008. “From Individual Attitudes towards Migrants to Migration Policy Outcomes: Theory and Evidence.” Economic Policy23(56):651–713.
15.
FacchiniG.MaydaA. M.2009. “Does the Welfare State Affect Individual Attitudes toward Immigrants? Evidence Across Countries.” The Review of Economics and Statistics91(2):295–314.
16.
Fernández-VillaverdeJ.KruegerD.. 2007. “Consumption over the Life Cycle: Facts from Consumer Expenditure Survey Data.” The Review of Economics and Statistics89(3):552–65.
17.
FullertonA. S.DixonJ. C.. 2010. “Generational Conflict or Methodological Artifact? Reconsidering the Relationship between Age and Policy Attitudes in the US, 1984–2008.” Public Opinion Quarterly74(4):643–73.
18.
GangI. N.Rivera-BatizF. L.. 1994. “Labor Market Effects of Immigration in the United States and Europe.” Journal of Population Economics7(2):157–75.
19.
GiulianoP.SpilimbergoA.. 2014. “Growing up in a Recession.” The Review of Economic Studies81(2):787–817.
20.
GöbelC.ZwickT.. 2013. “Are Personnel Measures Effective in Increasing Productivity of Old Workers?” Labour Economics22:80–93.
21.
HainmuellerJ.HiscoxM. J.. 2007. “Educated Preferences: Explaining Attitudes toward Immigration in Europe.” International Organization61(02):399–442.
22.
HainmuellerJ.HiscoxM. J.2010. “Attitudes Toward Highly Skilled and low-Skilled Immigration: Evidence From a Survey Experiment.” American Political Science Review104(01):61–84.
23.
HauptA.PetersW.. 1998. “Public Pensions and Voting on Immigration.” Public Choice95(3-4):403–13.
24.
IvlevsT.2008. “Attitudes towards Immigration: Does the Regional Birth Rate Matter?” Unpublished manuscript.
25.
IvlevsA.2012. “Ageing, Local Birth Rates and Attitudes towards Immigration: Evidence from a Transition Economy.” Regional Studies46(7):947–59.
26.
MaydaA. M.2006. “Who Is against Immigration? A Cross-country Investigation of Individual Attitudes toward Immigrants.” The Review of Economics and Statistics88(3):510–30.
27.
McKenzieD. J.2006. “Disentangling Age, Cohort and Time Effects in the Additive Model*.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics68(4):473–95.
28.
O’rourkeK. H.SinnottR.. 2006. “The Determinants of Individual Attitudes towards Immigration.” European Journal of Political Economy22(4):838–61.
29.
PeriG.SparberC.. 2009. “Task Specialization, Immigration, and Wages.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics1(3):135–69.
30.
RazinA.SadkaE.. 1999. “Migration and Pension with International Capital Mobility.” Journal of Public Economics74(1):141–50.
31.
RhodebeckL. A.1993. “The Politics of Greed? Political Preferences among the Elderly.” The Journal of Politics55(02):342–64.
32.
SandE.RazinA.. 2007. The Political-economy Positive Role of the Social Security System in Sustaining Immigration (but not Vice Versa). In Press: National Bureau of Economic Research. No. w13598.
33.
ScholtenU.ThumM.. 1996. “Public Pensions and Immigration Policy in a Democracy.” Public Choice87(3-4):347–61.
34.
Schulhofer-WohlS. 2013. “The Age-Time-Cohort Problem and the Identification of Structural Parameters in Life-cycle Models.” Unpublished paper.
SørensenR. J.2013. “Does Aging Affect Preferences for Welfare Spending? A Study of Peoples’ Spending Preferences in 22 Countries, 1985–2006.” European Journal of Political Economy29:259–71.
37.
StreetD.CossmanJ. S.. 2006. “Greatest Generation or Greedy Geezers? Social Spending Preferences and the Elderly.” Social Problems53(1):75–96.
38.
SvallforsS. 2008. “The Generational Contract in Sweden: Age-specific Attitudes to Age-related Policies.” Policy & Politics36(3):381–96.
39.
TilleyJ.EvansG.. 2014. “Ageing and Generational Effects on Vote Choice: Combining Cross-sectional and Panel Data to Estimate APC Effects.” Electoral Studies33:19–27.
40.
United Nations. 2012. World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision. http://esa.un.org/wpp/.
41.
VerbeekM.NijmanT.. 1992 “Can Cohort Data Be Treated as Genuine Panel Data?” Empirical Economics17(1):9–23.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
