This note challenges Joseph H. Carens’ assertion that no comprehensive liberal case has been made against open borders. The heart of a liberal case against open borders is the distinction between the equal moral standing of all people on the one hand, and the requirement to provide equal treatment on the other. The first does not necessarily imply the second. Border controls in rich countries can be justified by liberals on the grounds that they protect the most disadvantaged residents of those countries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BritzC. R.1999a Political Theory and International Relations, second edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
2.
BritzC. R.1999b “Social and Cosmopolitan Liberalism,”International Affairs, 75:515–529.
3.
BorjasG. G.1999Heaven's Door: Immigration Policy and the American Economy.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
4.
CarensJ. H.1999“Reconsidering Open Borders,”International Migration Review, 33(4):1082–1097.
5.
CarensJ. H.1987“Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders,”Review of Politics, 49:251–273.
6.
IsbisterJ.1999“Are Immigration Controls Ethical?” In Immigration: A Civil Rights Issue for the Americas. Ed. JonasS. and ThomasS. D.Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources: 85–98.
