A review of marked Colonoware recovered in South Carolina shows a very low level of precision. This lack of concern with aesthetics runs contrary to expectations for potters intent on placing important religious symbols, cosmograms, on their pots. This imprecision runs contrary to the high degree of precision evidenced in other Gullah-Geechee folk arts and crafts. It is suggested that many of the known, marked Colonoware vessels were incised or inscribed simply to identify the potter, the eventual owner, or the participant in a vessel-centered ritual.
AbramsL (2006) Quilombo Country: Afrobrazilian Villages in the 21st Century (film). Ridgewood, New York: Leonard Abrams.
2.
AghaAIsenbargerNPhillipsCE (2012) Traditions in Rice and Clay: Understanding an Eighteenth-Nineteenth Century Rice Plantation, Dean Hall Plantation (38BK2132), Berkeley County, South Carolina. Atlanta, Georgia: Brockington and Associates, Inc.
Delgado De TorresL (2006) Marked bowls, cross symbols & petit-maroons: A pan-African archaeology of black radicalism in the Atlantic World. Proud Flesh: New Afrikan Journal of Culture, Politics & Consciousness4: 1–26.
5.
diZerega WallD (2000) Twenty years after: Re-examining archaeological collections for evidence of New York City’s Colonial African Past. African-American Archaeology: Newsletter of the African-American Archaeology Network28.
6.
EspenshadeCT (2011) Colonoware. In: Katz-HymanMBRiceKS (eds) World of a Slave: Encyclopedia of the Material Life of Slaves in the United States, Volume 1:A-I. Santa Barbara, California: Greenwood, pp. 135–140.
7.
EspenshadeCTKennedyL (2002) Recognizing individual potters in nineteenth-century colonoware. North American Archaeologist23(2): 209–240.
8.
FennellCC (2003) Group identity, individual creativity, and symbolic generation in a BaKongo Diaspora. International Journal of Historical Archaeology7(1): 1–31.
9.
FennellCC (2007) Crossroads and Cosmologies: Diasporas and Ethnogenesis in the New World. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
10.
FergusonLG (1992) Uncommon Ground: Archaeology and Early African America, 1650–1800. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
11.
FergusonLG (1999) “The cross is a magic sign”: Marks on eighteenth-century bowls in South Carolina. In: SingletonTA (ed.) “I, Too, Am America”: Archaeological Studies of African-American Life. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, pp. 116–131.
12.
FergusonLG (2007) Comments on espenshade’s “Marked colonoware, underwater sampling, and questions of inference.” The African Diaspora Archaeology Newsletter, March 2007.
13.
FewkesJW (1897) Tusayan totemic signatures. American Anthropologist10(1): 1–12.
14.
FrankBE (2007) Marks of identity: Pottery of the Folona (Mali) and their “mothers”. African ArtsSpring 2007: 30–41.
SteenC (2011) Cosmograms, crosses, and Xs: Context and inference. Historical Archaeology45(2): 166–175.
20.
WatsonMA (2016) Kongo to kings county: African cultural continuities at the Lott Farmstead, Brooklyn, New York. Unpublished PhD dissertation, City University of New York, New York.
