Shell beads were important to Mississippians, and thousands of beads were found mostly associated with burials. Here I synthesize data on shell bead workshops from Greater Cahokia, along with crafting techniques. Different bead types required different tools, which, in conjunction with shell remains, allow the differentiation of columella versus disk bead workshops. Perishable drill tips were probably used. Bead size standardization is distinguished from craft specialization, and time spent on crafting indicates full-time specialists. Expeditions to get lightning whelk shells from the Gulf of Mexico were a part of the operational chain. The resources spent traveling to obtain shells, large workshop areas, time spent crafting beads, ethnohistoric accounts of shell barter, and the roles lightning whelk artifacts had/have in helping souls travel during liminal situations such as transitioning to death, all underscore the importance of Mississippian shell beads.
AdairJ (1971 [1775]). In: WilliamsSC (ed.) Adair's History of the American Indians. Johnson City, Tennessee: Watauga Press.
2.
AdamsJLOwnbyMF (2018) The manufacture and burial of Hohokam disk beads in the Tucson basin. American Antiquity83(3): 536–551.
3.
AhlerSRDePuydtPJ (1987) A reporton the 1931 Powell Mound excavations, Madison County, Illinois. Illinois State Museum Reports of Investigations. Report no. 43. Springfield, IL.
4.
AltSMKruchtenJDPauketatTR (2010) The construction and use of Cahokia's Grand plaza. Journal of Field Archaeology35(2): 131–146.
5.
ArnoldJE (1997) Household archaeology on the Channel Islands. In: Backdirt, Los Angeles, CA: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, University of California.
6.
ArnoldJERachalD (2002) The value of pismo clam tube beads in California: Experiments in drilling. North American Archaeologist23(3): 187–207.
7.
AshleyKThunenRL (2020) St Johns River fisher-hunter-gatherers: Florida's connection to Cahokia. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 27: 7-27. DOI:10.1007/s10816-019-09439-5.
8.
AustinRJ (2000) Microlithic drills from the Anderson mound at Jungle Prado: Possible evidence for late prehistoric craft production on the gulf coast of Florida. North American Archaeologist21(4): 291–321.
9.
BairesSE (2014) Cahokia's origins: religion, complexity and ridge-top mortuaries in the Mississippi River Valley. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois, US.
10.
BairesSE (2016) A microhistory of human and gastropod bodies and souls during Cahokia's Emergence. Cambridge Archaeological Journal27(2): 245–260.
11.
BairesSE (2017) Land of Water City of the Dead: Religion and Cahokia's Emergence. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
BaltusMRBairesSE (2012) Elements of ancient power in the Cahokian world. Journal of Social Archaeology12(2): 167–192.
14.
BarbourTESassamanKEAlmeyda ZambranoAM, et al. (2019) Rare pre-columbian settlement on the Florida gulf coast revealed through high-resolution drone LiDAR. PNAS116(47): 23493–23498.
15.
BareisCJ (1963) University of Illinois projects. In: FowlerML (ed.) Second Annual Report: American Bottoms Archaeology, July 1, 1962–June 30, 1963. Champaign: Illinois State Archaeological Survey, University of Illinois, 3–8.
16.
BlochL (2018) Tales of Esnesv: Indigenous oral traditions about trader-diplomats in ancient southeastern North America. American Anthropologist120(4): 781–794.
17.
BlochL (2019) Past as prophecy: Indigenous diplomacies beyond liberal settler regimes of recognition, as told in shell. Religions10(9): 10.
18.
BolesSLBrennanTKKozuchL, et al. (2018) Crafting and exotica at the East St Louis Precinct. In: EmersonTEKoldehoffBBrennanT (eds) Revealing Greater Cahokia, North America's First Native City: Rediscovery and Large-Scale Excavations of the East St Louis Precinct. Champaign, Urbana: Illinois State Archaeological Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana, 387–443.
19.
BoothDL (2019) Rediscovering the Mitchell site (11MS30). Rediscovery 7
20.
BowerSMMcgladderySEPriceIM (1994) Synopsis of infectious diseases and parasites of commercially exploited shellfish. Annual Review of Fish Diseases4: 1–199.
21.
BrownJA (1996) The Spiro Ceremonial Center: The Archaeology of Arkansas Valley Caddoan Culture in Eastern Oklahoma, vol. 2. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
22.
BrownJAKellyJE (2015) Surplus labor, ceremonial feasting, and social inequality at Cahokia: A study in social process. In: MorehartCTLuciaKD (eds) Surplus: The Politics of Production and the Strategies of Everyday Life. Boulder: University Press of Colorado, 221–244.
23.
BrownJAKerberRAWintersHD (1990) Trade and the evolution of exchange relations at the beginning of the Mississippian period. In: SmithBD (ed.) The Mississippian Emergence. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 251–280.
24.
CeciL (1982) The value of wampum among the New York Iroquois: A case study in artifact analysis. Journal of Anthropological Research38(1): 97–107.
25.
CeciL (1989) The anthropology of shell beads: Subsistence, systems, and symbols. In: HayesCFIIICeciLBodnerCC (eds) Proceedings of the 1986 Shell Bead Conference. Rochester, NY: Rochester Museum and Science Center, 1–5.
26.
ClaassenC (1998) Shells. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
27.
ClaassenC (2019) Shells below, stars above: Four perspectives on shell beads. Southeastern Archaeology38(2): 89–94.
28.
ConnawayJM (1981) The Keenan bead cache: Lawrence county, Mississippi. Louisiana Archaeology8: 57–71.
29.
ConnawayJM (2019) Shell beads from Mississippian sites in the northern Yazoo basin, Mississippi. Southeastern Archaeology38(2): 113–126.
30.
CoşkunsuG (2008) Hole-making tools of Mezraa Teleilat with special attention to micro-borers and cylindrical polished drills and bead production. Neo-lithics1: 25–36.
31.
CostinCL (1991) Craft specialization: Issues in defining, documenting, and explaining the organization of production. In: SchifferMB (ed.) Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 3. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1–56.
32.
CouplandGBiltonDClarkT, et al. (2016) A wealth of beads: Evidence for material wealth-based inequality in the Salish Sea region, 4000-3500 cal B.P. American Antiquity81(2): 294–315.
33.
DanielsSLMcElrathDL (2017) The afterlife of shell working tools: Early Mississippian shell working and the creation of inalienable wealth. Illinois Archaeology29: 75–128.
34.
De La VegaG (1988 [1605]). In: VarnerJGVarnerJJ (eds) The Florida of the Inca. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. https://utpress.utexas.edu/books/garflo
35.
Deshpande-MukherjeeASenguptaSNathJ (2014) The molluscan shell assemblage from Khirsara: Evidence for another Harappan shell working settlement in Gujarat. Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology2: 23–40.
36.
Deter-WolfAPeresT (2014) Embedded: 4,000 years of shell symbolism in the Southeast In: PeresTM (ed.) Trends and Traditions in Southeastern Zooarchaeology. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 161–185.
37.
DietlerJE (2008) Craft specialization and the emergence of political complexity in Southwest Florida. Unpublished PhD Dissertation,Department of Anthropology, University of California, US.
38.
DockallHDDockallJE (1996) The shell assemblage from Morhiss (41VT1), an archaic site on the west gulf coastal plain. Southeastern Archaeology15(2): 211–229.
39.
DunavanSL (1993) Plant remains. In: PauketatT (ed.) Temples for Cahokia Lords: Preston Holder's 1955-1956 Excavations of Kunnemann Mound. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 125–133.
40.
Du PratzLP (1975 [1774]). In: TregleJGJr (ed.) The History of Louisiana, Translated From the French of M. Le Page du Pratz. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
41.
EmersonTE (2018) The cultural content and context of the East St Louis Precinct. In: EmersonTEKoldehoffBBrennanT (eds) Revealing Greater Cahokia, North America's First Native City: Rediscovery and Large-Scale Excavations of the East St Louis Precinct. Champaign, Urbana: Illinois State Archaeological Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana, 25–58.
42.
EmersonTEBolesSL (2010) Contextualizing flint clay Cahokia figures at the East St Louis Mound center. Illinois Archaeology22(2): 473–490.
43.
EmersonTEHedmanKM (2016) The dangers of diversity: The consolidation and dissolution of Cahokia, native North America's First urban polity. In: FaulseitRK (ed.) Beyond Collapse: Archaeological Perspectives on Resilience, Revitalization, and Transformation in Complex Societies. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 147–175.
44.
EmersonTEHedmanKMHargraveEA, et al. (2016) Paradigms lost: Reconfiguring Cahokia's Mound 72 beaded burial. American Antiquity81(3): 405–425.
45.
EmersonTEHedmanKMSimonML, et al. (2020) Isotopic confirmation of the timing and intensity of maize consumption in greater Cahokia. American Antiquity85(2): 241–262.
46.
EvansRK (1978) Early craft specialization: An example from the Balkan chalcolithic. In: RedmanCLBermanMJCurtinEVLanghorneWTJr.VersaggiNMWanserJC (eds) Social Archaeology: Beyond Subsistence and Dating. New York: Academic Press, 113–129.
47.
FitzgeraldRTJonesTLSchrothA (2005) Ancient long-distance trade in western North America: New AMS radiocarbon dates from southern California. Journal of Archaeological Science32(3): 423–434.
48.
FortierACEmersonTEMcElrathDL (2006) Calibrating and reassessing American Bottom culture history. Southeastern Archaeology25(2): 170–211.
49.
FowlerML (1991) Mound 72 and early Mississippian at Cahokia. In: StoltmanJB (ed.) New Perspectives on Cahokia: Views From the Periphery. Madison, WI: Prehistory Press, 1–26.
50.
FowlerML (1997) The Cahokia Atlas: A Historical Atlas of Cahokia Archaeology. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
51.
FowlerMLRoseJLeestBV, et al. (1999) The Mound 72 Area: Dedicated and Sacred Space in Early Cahokia. Springfield: Illinois State Museum.
52.
GambleLH (2016) The entangled life of shell beads in North America. In: HaselgroveCKrmnicekS (eds) The Archaeology of Money. Leicester Archaeology Monograph 24, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom, 67–83.
53.
GambleLH (2020) The origin and use of shell bead money in California. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2020.101237.
54.
GambleLHKingCD (2011) Beads and ornaments from San Diego: Evidence for exchange networks in southern California and the American SouthwestJournal of California and Great Basin Anthropology31(2): 155–178.
55.
GurovaMBonsallC (2017) Experimental replication of stone, bone and shell beads from early neolithic sites in southeast Europe. In: Bar-Yosef MayerDEBonsallCChoykeAM (eds) Not Just for Show: The Archaeology of Beads, Beadwork, & Personal Ornaments. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 159–167.
56.
GurovaMBonsallCBradleyB, et al. (2014) Experimental approach to prehistoric drilling and bead manufacturing. In: CuraSCerezerJGurovaMSantanderBOosterbeekLCristóvãoJ (eds) Technology and Experimentation in Archaeology. Oxford, England: Archaeopress, 47–55.
57.
HaddowEFlexnerJLBedfordS, et al. (2018) Pendants and beads of stone, shell, and tooth from southern Vanuatu. In: LangleyMLitsterMWrightD, etal (eds) The Archaeology of Portable Art: Southeast Asian, Pacific, and Australian Perspectives. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315299112.
58.
HarlJKohnSKellyL, et al. (2011) Data recovery investigations at the Dampier Site (23SL2296). Research Report #607. Archaeological Research Center of St Louis, Inc. Submitted May 2011 to US Army Corps of Engineers, St Louis District, St. Louis, Missouri.
59.
HedmanKMSlaterPAFortMA, et al. (2018) Expanding the strontium isoscape for the American midcontinent: Identifying potential places of origin for Cahokian and Pre-columbian migrants. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports22: 202–213.
60.
HolleyGR (1995) Microliths and the Kunnemann Tract: An assessment of craft production at the Cahokia site. Illinois Archaeology7(1 & 2): 1–68.
61.
HowlandHR (1877) Recent archaeological discoveries in the American Bottom. Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences3(4-5): 204–211.
62.
HudsonCM (1979) Black Drink: A Native American Tea. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press.
63.
JacksonATGoldsteinMSKriegerAD (2000) The 1931 Excavations at the Sanders Site, Lamar County, Texas. Austin: University of Texas.
64.
JacksonDK (2015) Hawkins Hollow: A Late Mississippian Household in the American Bottom. Champaign, Urbana: Illinois State Archaeological Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana.
65.
JodryMAOwsleyDW (2014) A new look at the double burial from Horn Shelter No. 2. In: OwsleyDWJantzRL (eds) Kennewick Man: The Scientific Investigation of an Ancient American Skeleton. College Station, TX: Texas A & M University Press, 549-604.
66.
KellyJE (2005) The archaeology of the East St Louis Mound center: Past and present. In: PauketatTR (ed.) The Archaeology of the East St Louis Mound Center: Part I: The Southside Excavations. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1–43.
67.
KellyJE (2006) The ritualization of Cahokia: The structure and organization of early Cahokia crafts. In: ButlerBMWelchPD (eds) Leadership and Polity in Mississippian Society. Carbondale: Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, 236–263.
68.
KellyJEBrownJAHamlinJM, et al. (2007) The context for the early evidence of the southeastern ceremonial complex at Cahokia. In: KingA (ed.) Southeastern Ceremonial Complex: Chronology, Content, Context. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 57–87.
69.
KellyLS (2005) Stirling phase faunal remains. In: PauketatTR (ed.) The Archaeology of the East St Louis Mound Center: Part I: The Southside Excavations. Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 257–266.
70.
KinsellaL (1999) Drilling stone. In: Wescott D (ed) Primitive Technology: A Book of Earth Skills. Salt Lake City, UT: Gibbs-Smith, Publisher, 92–93.
71.
KoldehoffB (2018) Lithic analysis. In: SkousenBJ (ed.) Stirling and Moorehead Phase Craft Production at Cahokia's Fingerhut Tract, St Clair County, Illinois. Technical Report No. 176. Illinois State Archaeological Survey, Prairie Research Institute, Urbana: University of Illinois, 169–240.
72.
KozuchL (1998) Marine shells from mississippian archaeological sites. Unpublished PhD Dissertation,Anthropology Department, University of Florida, US.
73.
KozuchL (2002) Olivella beads from Spiro and the Plains. American Antiquity67(4): 697–709.
74.
KozuchL (2003) Use of fire in shell bead manufacture at Cahokia. Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History44(1): 81–90.
KozuchLBairesSE (2015) Manufacturingshell beads from the East St Louis site and Wilson Mound, Cahokia. Presented paper, 72nd Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Nashville, Tennessee.
KozuchLWalkerKJMarquardtWH (2017) Lightning whelk natural history and a new sourcing method. Southeastern Archaeology36(3): 226–240.
82.
KuehnSR (2013) Faunal remains. In: PauketatTR (ed.) The Archaeology of Downtown Cahokia II: The 1960 Excavation of Tract 15B. Urbana: Illinois State Archaeological Survey, University of Illinois, 275–298.
83.
LarsonLH (1971) Archaeological implications of social stratification at the Etowah site, Georgia. In: BrownJA (ed.) Approaches to the Social Dimensions of Mortuary Practices. Washington, DC: Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, 58–67.
84.
LawsonJ (1967) [1709] A New Voyage to Carolina, Edited by H. Talmage Lefler. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
85.
LiptonAPSyda RaoGJagadisI (2013) The Indian Sacred Chank. Kerala, India: Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute.
86.
MalinowskiB (1922) Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. New York: E.P. Dutton & Co.
87.
MarquardtWHKozuchL (2016) The lightning whelk: An enduring icon of southeastern North American spirituality. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology42: 1–26.
88.
MasonRJPerinoG (1961) Microblades at Cahokia, Illinois. American Antiquity26(4): 553–557.
89.
MelgarERCarrascoMDRD (2014) Los artesanos de concha y la élite de Calakmul: Los objectos eaborados y sus técnicas de manufactura. In: CarrascoMdRD (ed.) Encuentro Internacional: Los Investigadores de la Cultura Maya 22. Campeche, México: Universidad Autónoma de Campeche, Dirección de Difusión Cultural, 203–219.
90.
MillerJMKellerHMHeckelC, et al. (2021) Approaches to land snail shell bead manufacture in the early holocene of Malawi. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences37.
91.
MilnerGR (1984) Social and temporal implications of variation among American Bottom Mississippian cemeteries. American Antiquity49(3): 468–488.
92.
MilnerGR (2006) The Cahokia Chiefdom: The Archaeology of A Mississippian Society. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
93.
MorseDF (1975) Report of Excavations at the Zebree Site, 1969. Fayetteville: Arkansas Archeological Survey.
94.
MullerJ (1987) Salt, chert, and shell: Mississippian exchange and economy. In: BrumfielEEarleT (eds) Specialization, Exchange, and Complex Societies. London: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 10–21.
95.
NigraBTArnoldJE (2013) Explaining the monopoly in shell-bead production on the Channel Islands: Drilling experiments with four lithic raw materials. Journal of Archaeological Science40(10): 3647–3659.
96.
O’BrienPJ (1972) Urbanism, Cahokia, and middle Mississippian. Archaeology25(3): 189–197.
97.
OldMC (1941) The taxonomy and distribution of the boring sponges (Clionidae) along the Atlantic coast of North America. Chesapeake Biological Laboratory44: 3–30.
98.
OrchardWC (2000 [1929]) Beads and Beadwork of the American Indians. Liberty, UT: Eagle's View Publishing.
99.
PauketatTR (1993) Temples for Cahokia Lords: Preston Holder's 1955-1956 Excavations of Kunnemann Mound. Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.
100.
PauketatTR (1998) The Archaeology of Downtown Cahokia: The Tract 15A and Dunham Tract Excavations. Urbana: Illinois Transportation Archaeological Research Program, University of Illinois.
101.
PauketatTR (2019) Fragile Cahokian and Chacoan orders and infrastructures. In: YoffeeN (ed.) The Evolution of Fragility: The Conference. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, 89–108.
102.
PauketatTR (2013a) Lithic artifacts. In: PauketatTR (ed.) The Archaeology of Downtown Cahokia II: The 1960 Excavation of Tract 15B. Urbana: Illinois State Archaeological Survey, University of Illinois, 237–274.
103.
PauketatTR (2013b) Tract 15B's relevance today. In: PauketatTR (ed.) The Archaeology of Downtown Cahokia II: The 1960 Excavation of Tract 15B. Urbana: Illinois State Archaeological Survey, University of Illinois, 27–30.
104.
PauketatTR (2013c) Appendix M. In: PauketatTR (ed.) The Archaeology of Downtown Cahokia II: The 1960 Excavation of Tract 15B. Urbana: Illinois State Archaeological Survey, University of Illinois. http://isas.illinois.edu/publications/data/sia/8/Tract_15B_Appendix_M.xls
105.
PauketatTR (2013d) Tract 15B retrospective. In: PauketatTR (ed.) The Archaeology of Downtown Cahokia II: The 1960 Excavation of Tract 15B. Urbana: Illinois State Archaeological Survey, University of Illinois, 299–303.
106.
PauketatTRFortierACAltSM, et al. (2013) A Mississippian conflagration at East St Louis and its political-historical implications. Journal of Field Archaeology38(3): 210–226.
107.
PauketatTRKellyLSFritzGJ, et al. (2002) The residues of feasting and public ritual at early Cahokia. American Antiquity67(2): 257–279.
108.
PauketatTRKoldehoffB (2002) Cahokian ritual and the Ramey Field: new insights from old collections. Southeastern Archaeology 21(1): 79-91.
109.
PerinoGH (1959) Recent information from Cahokia and Its satellites. Central States Archaeological Journal6(4): 130–138.
110.
PerinoGH (1971) The Mississippian component at the Schild site (No. 4), Greene County, Illinois. Mississippian Site Archaeology in Illinois I. Urbana, Illinois Archaeological Survey, Bulletin No. 8, University of Illinois, 1–148.
111.
PorterJW (1975) Cahokia archaeology as viewed from the Mitchell Site: A satellite community at AD 1150-1200. Unpublished PhD Dissertation,Department of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin, US.
112.
SierzchulaMC (1980) Replication studies of the Zebree Microlithic Industry. MA Thesis,Department of Anthropology, University of Arkansas, US.
113.
SkousenBJ (2018) Stirling and Moorehead Phase Craft Production at Cahokia's Fingerhut Tract, St Clair County, Illinois. Technical Report No. 176. Illinois State Archaeological Survey, Prairie Research Institute, Urbana: University of Illinois.
114.
SmithGMCherkinskyAHaddenC, et al. (2016) The age and origin of Olivella beads from Oregon's LST-1 Rockshelter: The oldest marine shell beads in the northern great basin. American Antiquity81(3): 550–561.
115.
StaufferJG (2019) Vestiges of the Braden corridor from Cahokia to Lake Jackson. In: McNuttCHParishRM (eds) Cahokia in Context: Hegemony and Diaspora. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 371–390.
116.
SwantonJR (1946) The Indians of the Southeastern United States. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology.
117.
TitteringtonPF (1938) The Cahokia Mound Group and its Village Site Materials. St Louis, MO: Privately published.
118.
TrubittMB (2000) Mound building and prestige goods exchange: Changing strategies in the Cahokia chiefdom. American Antiquity65(4): 669–690.
119.
TrubittMB (2003) The production and exchange of marine shell prestige goods. Journal of Archaeological Research11(3): 243–277.
120.
TrubittMB (2005) Crafting marine shell goods at Cahokia. North American Archaeologist26(3): 249–266.
121.
WintersHD (1974) Some unusual grave goods from a Mississippian burial mound. Indian Notes10: 34–46.
WoRMS Editorial Board (2021) World Register of Marine Species. Available at:http://www.marinespecies.org(accessed 21 November 2020).
124.
YerkesRW (1983) Microwear, microdrills, and Mississippian craft production. American Antiquity48(3): 499–518.
125.
YerkesRW (1991) Specialization in shell artifact production at Cahokia. In: StoltmanJB (ed.) New Perspectives on Cahokia. Madison, WI: Prehistory Press, 49–64.
126.
YerkesRW (1993) Methods of manufacturing shell beads at prehistoric Mississippian sites in southeastern North America. In: AndersonPCBeyriesSOtteM, etal (eds) Traces et Fonction: Les Gestes Retrouvés. Liège, Belgium: Actes du Colloque International de Liège, Centre de Recherches Archéologiques du CNRS, Études et Recherches Archéologiques de l’Université de Liège, 235–242.
127.
YerkesRW (2003) Using lithic artifacts to study specialization in ancient societies: The Hopewell case. In: Nick KarduliasPYerkesRW (eds) Written in Stone: The Multiple Dimensions of Lithic Analysis. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 17–34.
128.
YerkesRW (2018) Microwear analysis of microdrills. In: Jacob SkousenB (ed.) Stirling and Moorehead Phase Craft Production at Cahokia's Fingerhut Tract, St Clair County, Illinois. Technical Report No. 176. Illinois State Archaeological Survey, Prairie Research Institute, Urbana: University of Illinois, 241–248.
129.
YerkesRW (1989a) Mississippian craft specialization on the American Bottom. Southeastern Archaeology8(2): 93–106.
130.
YerkesRW (1989b) Shell bead production and exchange in Mississippian populations. In: HayesCFIIICeciLBodnerCC (eds) Proceedings of the 1986 Shell Bead Conference. Rochester, NY: Rochester Museum and Science Center, 113–123.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
