BernsteinJames M.1986. The public's view of newspaper accountability.Newspaper Research Journal7: 1–9.
3.
CherianGeorge. 1993. Singapore. In The unfolding lotus: East Asia's changing media, ed. HeuvelJon Vanden, and DennisEverette E., 131–145. A Report of the Freedom Forum Media Studies Center at Columbia University, New York.
4.
EttemaJames S., and GlasserTheodore L.. 1987. Public accountability or public relations? Newspaper ombudsmen define their role.Journalism Quarterly64: 3–12.
5.
Gannett Center for Media Studies.1988. Media freedom and accountability. A conference report by the Gannett Foundation Program at Columbia University, New York.
6.
Graham-Yooll,Andrew. 1993. New dawn for press freedom? A personal and prejudiced opinion.Media Studies Journal7 (4): 21–27.
7.
HachtenWilliam A.1989. Media development without press freedom: Lee Kuan Yew's Singapore.Journalism Quarterly66 (4): 822–827.
8.
HardtHanno. 1983. Press freedom in Western societies. In Comparative mass media systems, ed. John MartinL., and ChaudharyAnju G., 291–308. New York: Longman.
9.
HardtHanno. 1988. Comparative media research: The world according to America.Critical Studies in Mass Communication5: 129–146.
10.
HartungBarbara, JaCobyAlfred, and DozierDavid. 1988. Readers' perceptions of purpose of newspaper ombudsman program.Journalism Quarterly65 (4): 914–919.
11.
KraftJoseph. 1981. The imperial media.Commentary71 (5): 36–47.
12.
KuoEddie. 1992. Confucianism as political discourse in Singapore: The case of an incomplete revitalization movement. Working paper in the Department of Sociology, National University of Singapore.
13.
LentJohn A.1978. Press freedom in Asia: The quiet but completed revolution.Gazette24 (1): 41–60.
14.
Lichter,Robert S, RothmanStanley, and LichterLinda S.. 1986. The media elite.Bethesa, Maryland: Alder and Alder.
15.
LuskinJohn. 1972. Lippmann, liberty and the press.Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
16.
LutherJohn, and RichstadJim. 1983. The world's regions and journalism: Asia and the Pacific. In Global journalism, ed. MerrillJohn C., 116–189. New York: Longman.
17.
MagaveroDonald T.1982. The American press ombudsmen.Journalism Quarterly59 (4): 548–553.
18.
MahathirM.1981. Freedom of the press—fact and fallacy.News Straits Times, July 9, 14.
19.
MehraA.1988. Press systems in ASEAN states.Singapore: Asian Mass Communication Research and Information Center.
20.
Nam,Sun-woo. 1983. Press freedom in the Third World. In Comparative mass media systems, ed. John MartinL., and ChaudharyAnju G., 309–326. New York: Longman.
21.
NelsonDavid, and StarckKenneth. 1974. The newspaper ombudsman as viewed by the rest of the staff.Journalism Quarterly51 (3): 453–457.
22.
O'Neill,Michael J.1983. A problem for the republic—A challenge for editors. In The adversary press, 1–23. A Modern Media Institute Ethics Center Seminar, Modern Media Institute, Florida.
23.
de Sola Pool,Ithiel. 1983. Technologies of freedom.Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
24.
PritchardDavid. 1993. The impact of newspaper ombudsmen on journalists' attitudes.Journalism Quarterly70 (1): 77–86.
25.
PyeLucian W.1963. Communications and political development.New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
26.
TanT. L., The Singapore press: Freedom, responsibility and credibility. Occasional Paper 3, The Institute of Policy Studies, Singapore.
27.
Tan,Yew Soon, and PengSoh Yew. 1994. The development of Singapore's modern media industry.Singapore: Times Academic Press.
28.
TehranianMajid. 1990. Technologies of power: Information machines and democratic prospects.Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
29.
RestonJames. 1967. The artillery of the press.New York: Harper & Row, Colophon Books.
30.
RuudCharles A.1979. Limits on the “freed” press of the 18th and 19th century Europe.Journalism Quarterly56 (3): 521–530.
31.
SchrammWilbur. 1964. Mass media and national development.California: Stanford University Press.
32.
SussmanLeonard R.1989. Power, the press and the technology of freedom: The coming of ISDN.New York: Freedom House.
33.
VogelEzra. 1989. A little dragon tamed. In Management of success: The molding of modern Singapore, ed. SandhuKernial Singh, and WheatleyPaul, 1049–1066. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
34.
Yeap,Soon Beng. 1994. The emergence of an Asian-centered perspective: Singapore's media regionalization strategies.Media Asia21 (2): 62–73.
35.
Yeap,Soon Beng. 1995. Relocation of authority in modernizing Asian economies: The emergence of less controlled media environments. Paper presented at the ASEAN Inter-University Seminar on Social Developments, Cebu, Philippines, 28-30 November.