Aronowitz, S.1981. The crisis in historical materialism. New York: Praeger.
3.
Barthes, R.1956. Mythologies. Paris: Le Seuil.
4.
Bernstein, B.1973. Class, codes and control. London: Paladin.
5.
Bourdieu, P. et Boltanski, L.1976. La production de l'Ideologie dominante. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 2(3): 4-8
6.
Bourdieu, P.1979. La Distinction. Paris: Minuit.
7.
. 1982. Ce que Parler Veut Dire. Paris: Fayard.
8.
Brewin, C.R. and Antaki, C.1987. An analysis of ordinary explanations in clinical attributions research. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5: 79-88.
9.
Castel, R.1978. La pauvrete aux etats-unis: Le statut de la misere dans une societe d' Abondance. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 19: 47-60.
10.
Coates K. and Silburn R.1970. Poverty: Theforgotten Englishmen. Nottingham: Spokesman.
11.
Coontz S.1993. The way we never were. New York: Basic Books.
12.
van Dijk, T.1985. Handbook of discourse analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.
13.
Duncan, G.J.1984. Years of poverty, years of plenty. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center of University of Michigan Press.
14.
Eagleton, T.1983. Literary theory. Minniapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
15.
Edelman, M.1964. The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana : University of Illinois Press.
16.
Fiske, J.1986. Television: Polysemy and popularity.Critical Studies in Mass Communications3(4): 391-406.
17.
Gamson, W.1992. Talking politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Gilbert, D. and Kahl, J.1982. The American class structure. Homewood : The Dorsey Press.
19.
Gitlin, T.1983. Inside from prime time, New York: Pantheon Books.
20.
_. 1987. Television's screens: Hegemony in transition. In American media and mass culture, D. Lazere, ed., 240-265. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
Hall, S.1985. Signification, representation, ideology: Althusser and the Post-Structuralist debates. Critical Studies in Mass Communication2(2): 91-114.
22.
Hartley, J.Understanding news. London: Methuen .
23.
Harvey, J.H., Turnquist, D. and Agostinelli, G.1988. Identifying attributions in oral and written explanations . In Analyzing everyday explanation, C. Antaki, ed., 20-40. Newbury Park: Sage .
24.
van Hoolthon F. and Olson D.R.1987. Common sense. London: University Press of America.
25.
Iyengar, S.1990. Television news and the citizens' explanation of national affairs. In Media power in politics, D. Graber, ed., 124-35. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
26.
Kairol, R.1984. Children's causal scripts and derogation of the poor: An attribution analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(3): 791-98.
27.
Luckmann, T.1987. Some thoughts on common sense and science. In Common sense, van Hoolthon F. and Olson D. R., eds., 162-90. London: University Press of America.
28.
Nisbett, R. and Ross, L.1980. Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgement. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
29.
Padioleau, J.G. et Eymerat M.1983. L'Etude des styles cognitifs dans la pensee sociale ou politiqueIn L'Annee Sociologique32: 39-60.
30.
Stormes, J.1988. The poor in the United States: A class analytic approach . Rethinking Marxism Summer, 76-102.
31.
Volosinov, V.N.1973. Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: New York University Press.
32.
Watt, I.1956. Robinson Crusoe, individualism, and the novel. In The rise of the novel, 62-96. London: Penguin Books.
33.
Williams, R.1977. Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.