While both Sigmund Freud and George Herbert Mead
approach the study of the individual mind by specifying the importance of social influence on its formation
and behavior, differences between them in emphasis
and orientation exemplify the diversity which the new
concern with group phenomena permitted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Fodor, Nandor and Frank Gaynor, eds. Freud: Dictionary of Psychoanalysis .Greenwich, Conn.: Fawcett Publications, Inc., 1963.
2.
Freud, Sigmund.Civilization and its Discontents Translated by James Strachey. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, Inc., 1961.
3.
_. A general Introduction to Psychoanalysis Translated by Joan Riviere, with a preface by Ernest Jones and G. Stanley Hall. Garden City, N.Y.: Garden City Publishing Co., 1935.
4.
Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego Translated by James Strachey. N.Y.: W.W. Norton and Company, Inc., 1959.
5.
_. The Origin and Development of Psychoanalysis Introduction by Eliseo Vivas. Chicago: Gateway, 1965.
6.
Mead, George Herbert.Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Edited and with an introduction by Charles W. Morris. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1972 (1934).
7.
The Philosophy of the Present. LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court Publishing Co., 1959 (1932).
8.
Persons, Stow. American Minds: A History of Ideas. Huntington, N.Y.: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company, 1975.
