Risk Narratives on Immigration During the COVID-19 Crisis in Italy: A Comparative Analysis of Facebook Posts Published by Politicians and by News media

Abstract

This work explores how the narrative on immigration changes when society is threatened by “real” risks, i.e., during the COVID-19 health crisis. We compared the frequency and engagement of over 348,684 posts published on Facebook between December 2019 and November 2020 by Italian politicians and news media. We identified two waves of  “tangible crisis” assuming that in these two periods the risk stemming from COVID-19 was strongly perceived by the Italian population, contrasting our observations to the periods preceding the first wave and between both waves. Our findings suggest that the political discourse and risk narratives on immigration decreased during times of “tangible crises” for right-wing populist parties and news media. This happened at a time when key policies regarding immigration and regularization of migrants were highly discussed by the Italian government, receiving unexpectedly low reactions. This leads us to theorize that anti-immigrant communication decreases during times of “tangible crises.” 

Keywords

COVID-19 immigration right-wing populism risk narratives social media

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aslanidis

(2018). Measuring populist discourse with semantic text analysis: An application on grassroots populist mobilization. Quality & Quantity, 52(3), 1241–1263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0517-4

Beck

(1992). Risk society: Towards a New Modernity (Vol. 17). Sage.

Beck

(1996). The reinvention of politics. Rethinking modernity in the global social order (pp. 1–216). Polity Press.

Beck

(2006). Cosmopolitan Vision. Polity Press.

Boberg

Quandt

Schatto-Eckrodt

Frischlich

(2020). Pandemic populism: Facebook pages of alternative news media and the corona crisis–A computational content analysis. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.02566.

Boeynaems

Burgers

Konijn

E. A.

(2021). When figurative frames decrease political persuasion: The case of right-wing anti-immigration rhetoric. Discourse Processes, 58(3), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1851121

Boomgaarden

McLaren

Vliegenthart

(2017). News coverage and public concern about immigration in Britain. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30(2), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw033

Bracciale

Martella

(2017). Define the populist political communication style: The case of Italian political leaders on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1310–1329. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328522

Brown

G. D.

Largey

McMullan

(2021). The impact of gender on risk perception: Implications for EU member states’ national risk assessment processes. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 63(1), 102452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102452

10.

Bryant

Fondren

(2009). Displacement effects. In Nabi

R. L.

Oliver

M. B.

(Eds.), The sage handbook of Media processes and effects (pp. 505–516). Sage.

11.

Burgess

Wardman

Mythen

(2018). Considering risk: Placing the work of Ulrich beck in context. Journal of Risk Research, 21(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1383075

12.

Combei

Giannetti

(2020). The immigration issue on twitter political communication in Italy 2018-2019. Comunicazione Politica, 21(2), 231–263. https://doi.org/10.3270/97905

13.

CrowdTangle Team (2020). CrowdTangle. Facebook, Menlo Park.

14.

Di Mauro

Verzichelli

(2019). Political elites and immigration in Italy: Party competition, polarization and new cleavages. Contemporary Italian Politics, 11(4), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2019.1679960

15.

Douglas

(2013). Risk and Blame. Routledge.

16.

Eberl

J. M.

Huber

R. A.

Greussing

(2021). From populism to the “plandemic”: Why populists believe in COVID-19 conspiracies. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31(sup1), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2021.1924730

17.

Eberl

J. M.

Meltzer

C. E.

Heidenreich

Herrero

Theorin

Lind

Strömbäck

(2018). The European media discourse on immigration and its effects: A literature review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 42(3), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2018.1497452

18.

Fairclough

(1989). Language and Power. Longman.

19.

Fischhoff

Slovic

Lichtenstein

Read

Combs

(1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9, 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143739

20.

Gerbaudo

(2014). Populism 2.0. In Trottier

Fuchs

(Eds.), Social media, politics and the state: Protests, revolutions, riots, crime and policing in the age of Facebook, twitter and YouTube (pp. 16–67). Routledge.

21.

Goodwyn

(1976). Democratic Promise: The Populist Moment in America. Oxford University Press.

22.

Gottlob

Boomgaarden

(2020). The 2015 refugee crisis, uncertainty and the media: Representations of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in Austrian and French media. Communications, 45(s1), 841–863. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2019-2077

23.

Gottlob

Boomgaarden

(2022). Risk propensity, news frames and immigration attitudes. International Journal of Communication, 16, 24. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/17263

24.

Greussing

Boomgaarden

H. G.

(2017). Shifting the refugee narrative? An automated frame analysis of Europe’s 2015 refugee crisis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(11), 1749–1774. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1282813

25.

Gründl

(2020). Populist ideas on social media: A dictionary-based measurement of populist communication. New Media & Society, 24(6), 1481–1499. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820976970

26.

Gründl

Aichholzer

(2020). Support for the populist radical right: Between uncertainty avoidance and risky choice. Political Psychology, 41(4), 641–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12643

27.

Halliday

M. A. K.

(1994). Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold.

28.

Harlow

(2015). Losing focus: Goal displacement at an alternative newspaper in El Salvador. Media, Culture & Society, 37(8), 1119–1137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715591665

29.

Heidenreich

Eberl

J. M.

Lind

Boomgaarden

(2019). Political migration discourses on social media: A comparative perspective on visibility and sentiment across political Facebook accounts in Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(7), 1261–1280. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1665990

30.

Heinisch

Massetti

Mazzoleni

(Eds.). (2019). The People and the Nation: Populism and Ethno-Territorial Politics in Europe (1st ed.). Routledge.

31.

Heisbourg

(2015). The strategic implications of the Syrian refugee crisis. Survival, 57(6), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2015.1116144

32.

Heiss

Matthes

(2020). Stuck in a nativist spiral: Content, selection, and effects of right-wing populists’ communication on Facebook. Political Communication, 37(3), 303–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1661890

33.

Heywood

(2015). Key Concepts in Politics and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan.

34.

Hier

S. P.

Greenberg

J. L.

(2002). Constructing a discursive crisis: Risk, problematization and illegal Chinese in Canada. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 25(3), 490–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870020036701

35.

Hogg

M. A.

(2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11(1), 223–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772043000040

36.

Horsti

(2008). Hope and despair: Representation of Europe and Africa in news coverage of ‘migration crisis’. Communication Studies, 3, 125–156. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1694392

37.

Lanzone

Woods

(2015). Riding the populist web: Contextualizing the five star movement (M5S) in Italy. Politics and Governance, 3(2), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v3i2.246

38.

Lecheler

Matthes

Boomgaarden

(2019). Setting the agenda for research on media and migration: State-of-the-art and directions for future research. Mass Communication and Society, 22(6), 691–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2019.1688059

39.

Liu

Zhang

Huang

(2020). Media exposure to COVID-19 information, risk perception, social and geographical proximity, and self-rated anxiety in China. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1649. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09761-8

40.

Lowndes

(2017). Populism in the United States. In Rovira Kaltwasser

Taggart

Ochoa Espejo

Ostiguy

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 232–247). Oxford University Press.

41.

Machin

Mayr

(2012). How To Do Critical Discourse Analysis. Sage.

42.

Macnamara

J. R.

(2005). Media content analysis: Its uses, benefits and best practice methodology. Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal, 6(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lci133

43.

Maltone-Bonnenfant

(2011). L'immigrazione nei media Italiani. Disinformazione, stereotipi e innovazioni. Line@editoriale, 3(3), 62–78. https://hal.science/hal-02641035

44.

Miłkowska-Samul

(2018). Il discorso anti-immigrazione: Migranti, immigrati, profughi, rifugiati nei social media Italiani. Confini e Zone di Frontiera Negli/Degli Studi Italiani, 61–74.

45.

Morgan

M. G.

(1993). Risk analysis and management. Scientific American, 269(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0793-32

46.

Mosca

Tronconi

(2019). Beyond left and right: The eclectic populism of the five star movement. West European Politics, 42(6), 1258–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1596691

47.

Mudde

(2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x

48.

Padovani

(2018). Lega nord and anti-immigrationism: The importance of hegemony critique for social media analysis and protest. International Journal of Communication, 12(27), 3553–3579.

49.

Pierri

Artoni

Ceri

(2020). Investigating Italian disinformation spreading on Twitter in the context of 2019 European elections. PloS One, 15(1), e0227821. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227821

50.

Rooduijn

Van Kessel

Froio

Pirro

De Lange

Halikiopoulou

Lewis

Mudde

Taggart

(2019). The PopuList: An Overview of Populist, Far Right, Far Left and Eurosceptic Parties in Europe. www.popu-list.org.

51.

Scheufele

D. A.

(2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society, 3(2-3), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07

52.

Sjöberg

(2003). Distal factors in risk perception. Journal of Risk Research, 6(3), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366987032000088847

53.

Slovic

(1999). Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis: An International Journals, 19(4), 689–701. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007041821623

54.

Slovic

Lichtenstein

Fischhoff

(1979). Images of disaster: perception and acceptance of risks from nuclear power.

55.

Sniderman

P. M.

Hagendoorn

Prior

(2004). Predisposing factors and situational triggers: Exclusionary reactions to immigrant minorities’. American Political Science Review, 98(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540400098X

56.

Tarchi

(2015). Italy: The promised land of populism? Contemporary Italian Politics, 7(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2015.1094224

57.

Teo

(2000). Racism in the news. A critical discourse analysis of news reporting in two Australian newspapers. Discourse & Society, 11(1), 7–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926500011001002

58.

Ungar

(2001). Moral panic versus the risk society: The implications of the changing sites of social anxiety. The British Journal of Sociology, 52(2), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310120044980

59.

Van Leeuwen

(1996). Representing social action’. Discourse & Society, 6(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006001005

60.

Wirth

Esser

Wettstein

Engesser

Wirz

Schulz

Ernst

Büchel

Caramani

Manucci

Steenbergen

Bernhard

Weber

Hänggli

Dalmus

Schemer

(2016). The appeal of populist ideas, strategies and styles: A theoretical model and research design for analyzing populist political communication. University of Zurich: Working Paper 88 of the National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) on Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century.

61.

World Health Organisation (2020). Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic, https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB