Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in March 2020, the Spanish Government announced a total lockdown of the population and the interruption of all nonessential economic activity. From this point, televisions adapted their programming schedules by reducing their usual informative content, such as sport or economic segments. In this context, it would be reasonable to assume that the overall television coverage devoted to the main Spanish brands would decrease, but what about those considered to be most active in the field of corporate social responsibility (CSR)? In this work, we analyze the presence of the Spanish brands that are most valued for their CSR on the four main television channels with the highest audience over the two months of total lockdown, and also in the online press. The study confirms that the television coverage of these brands was not only reduced but was also mostly positive during the pandemic, so it reveals the CSR importance in crisis periods.
AmadeoB. (2002). La teoría del framing. Los medios de comunicación y la transmisión de significados. Revista de Comunicación, 1(1), 6–30.
2.
Ardèvol AbreuA.Gil de ZúñigaH.McCombsM. E. (2020). Orígenes y desarrollo de la teoría de la agenda setting en comunicación. Tendencias en España (2014–2019). Profesional de la Información, 29(4), e290414. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.jul.14
3.
ArugueteN. (2017). Agenda setting y framing: Un debate inconcluso. Más Poder Local.30, 36–42.
4.
Balaguer FranchM. R.NaeI. C. (2013). La crisis financiera y la responsabilidad social corporativa en las entidades financieras españolas, en La Gran Recesión y sus salidas. Proceedings of I Congreso de Economía y Libertad. Ávila.
5.
BanerjeeS. I.BalaganapathyS. (2020). COVID as a marketing tool for advertisements. Communication Today, 24(2-4), 108–115.
6.
BardinL. (1996). (2ª ed) análisis de contenido. Akal.
BatesonG. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in antropology, psychiatry, evolution and epistemology. Ballantine Books.
9.
BerensG.Van RielC. B. M.Van BruggenG. H. (2005). Corporate associations and consumer product responses: The moderating role of corporate brand dominance. Journal of Marketing, 69, 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.69.3.35.66357
BrownT. J.DacinP. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299706100106
Casero RipollésA. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on the media system. Communicative and democratic consequences of news consumption during the outbreak. El Profesional de la Información, 29(2), e290223. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.mar.23
FengD. (2016). Doing “authentic” news: voices, forms, and strategies in presentingtelevision news. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4239–4257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481319890387
17.
Fernández RiquelmeS. (2020). Primera historia de la crisis del coronavirus en españa. La Razón Histórica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Historia de las Ideas, (46), 12–22.
18.
FontrodonaJ.MullerP. (2020). Reforzar la integridad empresarial ante la crisis del Covid-19 (Strengthening Business Integrity in the Face of the COVID-19 Crisis) (April 8, 2020). IESE Business School Working Paper No. OP-333.
19.
Gil SalmerónA. M. (2016). The relationship of CSR and the business profit: Can the most responsible companies be more profitable?Journal FIR, FAEDPYME International Review, 5(8), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.15558/fir.v5i8.107
20.
GoffmanE. (2006). Frame analysis. Los marcos de la experiencia (1° ed.). Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS), Siglo XXI Editores.
21.
González RomoaZ.Iriarte AguirreaS. (2020). Analysis of the communication management of spanish pharmaceutical influencers on Instagram during the COVID-19 pandemic. Revista Española de Comunicación en Salud. Suplemento, 1, S9–S30. https://doi.org/10.20318/recs.2020.5402
22.
HallinD. C. (1986). The uncensored war: The media and Vietnam. University of California Press.
23.
HandelmanJ. M.ArnoldS. J. (1999). The role of marketing actions with a social dimension: Appeals to the institutional environment. Journal of Marketing, 63, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299906300303
24.
Hao NguyenM.GruberJ.FuchsJ.MarlerW.HunsakerA.HargittaiE. (2020). Changes in digital communication during the COVID-19 global pandemic: Implications for digital inequality and future research. Social Media + Society, July-September 2020, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120948255
25.
HeH.HarrisL. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on corporate social responsibility and marketing philosophy. Journal of Business Research, 116, 176–182. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.030
26.
IgartuaJ. J.Ortega MohedanoF.Arcila CalderónC. (2020). Communication use in the times of the coronavirus. A cross-cultural study. El Profesional de la Información, 29(3), e290318. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.18
KimS.AustinL. (2020). Effects of CSR initiatives on company perceptions among millennial and gen Z consumers. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 25(2), 299–317(19). https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-07-2018-0077
30.
KrippendorffK. (1990). Metodología de análisis de contenido. Teoría y Práctica. Paidos Comunicación.
31.
López RicoC.González EstebanJ. L.Hernández MartínezA. (2020). Polarization and trust in spanish media during the COVID-19. Identification of audience profiles. Revista Española de Comunicación en Salud, Suplemento 1, S77–S89. https://doi.org/10.20318/recs.2020.5439
32.
McCombsM. E. (2006). Estableciendo la agenda. El impacto de los medios en la opinión pública y en el conocimiento. Paidós.
33.
McCombsM. E.ShawD. L. (1972). The agenda setting function of the media. Public Opinion Quarterly, XXXVI, 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
MirasM.Escobar-PérezE.GalánJ. L. (2015). Efecto de la crisis sobre el compromiso social de las empresas españolas cotizadas. Universia Business Review, (48), 18–51.
36.
NavarroJ. A.OlmoA. (2018). Presencia política en televisión Española en los últimos procesos electorales. Estudios Sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 24(2), 1473–1488. https://doi.org/10.5209/ESMP.62229
37.
PapaV.ManouT. (2020). Recurrent narratives around the COVID-19 crisis in social networks: A case study analysis on Facebook. Tripodos, 47(2), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.51698/tripodos.2020.47p11-28
38.
Pérez DasilvaJ. A.Meso AyerdiK.Mendiguren GaldospínT. (2020). Fake news y coronavirus: Detección de los principales actores y tendencias a través del análisis de las conversaciones en Twitter. El Profesional de la Información, 29(3), e290308. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.08
39.
Piñeiro NavalV. (2020). La metodología de análisis de contenido. Usos y aplicaciones en la investigación comunicativa del ámbito hispánico. Communication & Society, 33(3), 1–16. 10.15581/003.33.3.1-16
40.
RaduR. (2020). Fighting the ‘infodemic’: Legal responses to COVID-19 disinformation. Social Media + Society, 6(3), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120948190
41.
RobinsonP. (2001). Theorizing the influence of media on world politics: Models of media influence on foreign policy. European Journal of Communication, 16(4), 523–544. 10.1177/0267323101016004005
Sanjuán PérezA.Martínez CostaS.Videla RodríguezJ. J.Nozal CantareroT. (2020). Información sobre coronavirus y COVID-19 en las principales cadenas de TV españolas en el periodo previo al confinamiento. Profesional de la Información, 29(6), e290611. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.nov.11
44.
Santos JaénJ. M.Tornel MarínM. T.Gracia OrtizM. D. (2020). Repercusiones sobre las empresas de sus actuaciones socialmente responsables ante la pandemia generada por el COVID-19. La Razón Histórica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Historia de las Ideas, (46), 1–11.
ScheufeleD. A.TewksburyD. (2007). Framing, agenda setting and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x
47.
SchudsonM. (2003). What’s unusual about covering politics as usual. In ZelizerB.AllanS. (Eds.), Journalism after September (Vol. 11, pp. 70–80). Routledge.
48.
ShoemakerP.ReeseS. (1996). Mediating the message. Theories of influences on mass media content. Longman.
SireraS. (2020). Marcas en cuarentena. Revista de los Estudios de Ciencias de la Información y la Comunicación (COMeIN), March 2020,97), 2014–2226. https://doi.org/10.7238/c.n97.2024
ThelwallM.ThelwallS. (2020). COVID-19 tweeting in English: gender differences. El Profesional de la Información, 29(3), e290301. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.01
53.
TombaC.AllisiardiA.MuñozC.CortellezziP.LiraV. A. (2020). La responsabilidad de la comunicación de bien público en tiempos de pandemia. Análisis comparativo entre Argentina y España. Informe realizado en el marco del COVID-19. Observatorio de Medios. Universidad Juan Agustín Maza.
54.
Túñez LópezM.Vaz ÁlvarezM.Fieiras CeideC. (2020). COVID-19 and public service media: Impact of the pandemic on public television in Europe. Profesional de la Información, 29(5), e290518. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.18
55.
VillagraN.CárdabaM. A. M.Ruiz San RománJ. A. (2016). Comunicación de RSC: Una revisión de las tesis clásicas sobre la coherencia entre la acción de RSC y la actividad organizacional. Communication & Society, 29(2), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.29.2.sp.133-149
XifraJ. (2020). Comunicación corporativa, relaciones públicas y gestión del riesgo reputacional en tiempos del COVID-19. El Profesional de la Información, 29(2), e290220. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.mar.20
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
