Virtual vs. Real Self: Gendered Presentation and Everyday Performance of Virtual Selfhood

Abstract

The presentation and performance of women's selfhood and identity in Pakistan, in both the real and the virtual world, is dictated and shaped by the male-dominated cultural mores of Pakistan. Therefore, drawing upon Goffman's notion of self-presentation and everyday performance of selfhood, this paper explores digitally active Pakistani women's selfhood and identity presentation through qualitative interviews with ten Pakistani women from diverse backgrounds. Participants’ narratives revealed identity conflicts between their offline and online identities due to the control exhibited by the prevalent cultural norms and values. Similarly, offline cultural mores of the veil seeping into the online world operate as a patriarchal means of controlling women online akin to the male-protected family and home as a sacred sanctuary providing security to the family women. Pakistani women's experience of the online world is also defined in terms of “digital veil” and “digital sanctuary”. Findings reveal that Pakistani women social media users’ offline self-presentation clashes with their performance of selfhood in their virtual lives. This divergence and resulting identity crisis of selfhood is shaped by cultural regulation which adversely affects Pakistani women's lives. Extended research on social and cyber culture in offline and online identity formation with respect to psychosocial implications is recommended.

Keywords

digital veil digital sanctuary online identity pakistani women social media virtual selfhood

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbas

Hussain

Rasool

(2019). Digital literacy effect on the academic performance of students at higher education level in Pakistan. Global Social Sciences Review, 4(1), 154–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(IV-I).14

Addis

Joxhe

(2016, April). Gender gaps in social capital: A theoretical interpretation of the Italian evidence. In Second European Conference on Social Networks (p. 138).

Afzal

Butt

A. R.

Akbar

R. A.

Roshi

(2013). Gender disparity in Pakistan: A case of middle and secondary education in punjab. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 7(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijssm.v3i4.15962

Aksar

I. A.

Firdaus

A. S. B.

Danaee

Maqsood

(2020). Virtual manifestations of patriarchy: Digital experience of Pakistani women. Asian Women, 36(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.14431/aw.2020.3.36.1.61

Altheide

D. L.

(2000). Identity and the definition of the situation in a mass-mediated context. Symbolic Interaction, 23(1), 1–27.

Antonio

Tuffley

(2014). The gender digital divide in developing countries. Future Internet, 6(4), 673–687. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi6040673

Bailey

Steeves

Burkell

Regan

(2013). Negotiating with gender stereotypes on social networking sites: From “bicycle face” to Facebook. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 37(2), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859912473777

Bargh

J. A.

Mckenna

K. Y.

Fitzsimons

G. M.

(2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the" true self" on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 33–48.

Boyce

Neale

(2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input. Pathfinder International (Vol. 4). https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730210154225

10.

Boyd

D. M.

Ellison

N. B.

(2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.

11.

Butler

(1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519–531.

12.

Carrotte

E. R.

Prichard

Lim

M. S. C.

(2017). “Fitspiration” on social media: A content analysis of gendered images. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(3), e6368.

13.

Caza

B. B.

Moss

Vough

(2018). From synchronizing to harmonizing: The process of authenticating multiple work identities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(4), 703–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217733972

14.

Chang

Ren

Yang

(2018). A virtual gender asylum? The social media profile picture, young Chinese women’s self-empowerment, and the emergence of a Chinese digital feminism. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877916682085

15.

Chauhan

(2014). Patriarchal Pakistan: Women’s representation, access to resources, and institutional practices. In Gender inequality in the public sector in Pakistan (pp. 57–87). Palgrave Macmillan.

16.

Chayko

(2008). Portable communities: The dynamics of online and mobile connectedness. State University of New York Press.

17.

Christensen

N. B.

(2003). Inuit in cyberspace: Embedding offline identities online. Museum Tusculanum Press.

18.

Chuang

Schechter

(2015). Social networks in developing countries. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 7(1), 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100814-125123

19.

Conrad

(2007). Chapter 1 - The pedagogy of confession: Exploring identity and the online self. In Osborn

Houston

Nuala

(Eds.), The pedagogy of lifelong learning: Understanding effective teaching and learning in diverse contexts (pp. 203–213). Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

20.

Crane

G. M.

Gardner

J. M.

(2016). Pathology image-sharing on social media: Recommendations for protecting privacy while motivating education. AMA Journal of Ethics, 18(8), 817–825. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.8.stas1-1608

21.

Creswell

J. W.

(2013). Steps in conducting a scholarly mixed methods study.

22.

Dale

(1995). Nattering on the Net: Women, power and cyberspace.

23.

Debatin

Lovejoy

J. P.

Horn

A. K.

Hughes

B. N.

(2009). Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01494.x

24.

Digital Rights Foundation. 2017. https://digitalrightsfoundation.pk/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Cyber-Harassment-Helpline-Six-Month-Report.pdf

25.

Dini

A. A.

Sæbø

(2016). The current state of social media research for eparticipation in developing countries: A literature review. In 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. January). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.651

26.

Dobrowsky

(2012). Constructing identity on social networks. An analysis of competences of communication constituted on Facebook.com. Central European Journal of Communication, 5(8), 91–103. http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-c7b8d2ab-38b2-4078-a3d1-6b5a062f54d7/c/CEJC_Vol5_No1_Dobrowsky.pdf

27.

Dobson

Kanai

(2016). Digital media and gender.

28.

Ebrahimi

Salaverría

(2015). Virtual identities of Muslim women: A case study of Iranian Facebook users. Observatorio (OBS*), 9(1), 159–170. http://obs.obercom.pt/index.php/obs/article/view/781

29.

Eltantawy

(2013). From veiling to blogging: Women and media in the Middle East. Feminist Media Studies, 13(5), 765–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2013.838356

30.

Evans, J., & Hall, S. (Eds.). (1999), Visual culture: The reader. Sage.

31.

Fardouly

Holland

(2018). Social media is not real life: The effect of attaching disclaimer-type labels to idealized social media images on women’s body image and mood. New Media and Society, 20(11), 4311–4328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818771083

32.

Fearon

J. D.

(1999). What is identity (as we now use the word)? Department of Political Science (Stanford University), 1–43.

33.

Frison

Eggermont

(2016). Exploring the relationships between different types of Facebook use, perceived online social support, and adolescents’ depressed mood. Social Science Computer Review, 34(2), 153–171.

34.

Gajjala

(2013). Cyberculture and the subaltern: Weavings of the virtual and real. Rowman and Littlefield.

35.

Gajjala

Zhang

Dako-Gyeke

(2010). Lexicons of women's empowerment online: Appropriating the other. Feminist Media Studies, 10(1), 69–86.

36.

Gallagher

. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends in cognitive sciences, 4(1), 14–21.

37.

Genner

Süss

. (2017). Socialization as media effect. The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects, 1.

38.

Ghaznavi

Taylor

L. D.

(2015). Bones, body parts, and sex appeal: An analysis of #thinspiration images on popular social media. Body Image, 14, 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.03.006

39.

Gobal Digital Report. (2021). https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-pakistan

40.

Goffman

(1978). The presentation of self in everyday life. In The presentation of self in everyday life (pp. 1–10).

41.

Guion

Diehl

McDonald

(2006). Conducting an in-depth interview 1. IFAS Education, 1–4. http://greenmedicine.ie/school/images/Library/Conducting%20An%20In%20Depth%20Interview.pdf

42.

Gündüz

(2017). The effect of social media on identity construction. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(5), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1515/mjss-2017-0026

43.

Gündüz

Pembecioğlu

(2014). The concept of news in social media sharing’s. Annual international conference on journalism and mass communications, 1, 156–163

44.

Guta

Karolak

(2015). Veiling and blogging: Social media as sites of identity negotiation and expression among Saudi women. Journal of International Women's Studies, 16(2), 115–127.

45.

Habiba

Ali

Ashfaq

(2016). From patriarchy to neopatriarchy: Experiences of women from Pakistan. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6(3), 212–221. http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_6_No_3_March_2016/24.pdf

46.

Hadi

(2017). Patriarchy and gender-based violence in Pakistan. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 10(2), 297. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v10i2.p297-304

47.

Haferkamp

Eimler

S. C.

Papadakis

A. M.

Kruck

J. V.

(2012). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus? Examining gender differences in self-presentation on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 91–98.

48.

Hall

N. A.

Hall

(2008). Applied social research. Macmillan Education AU.

49.

Hall

(1996). Hall who needs identity.pdf. In Questions of cultural identity (Vol. 2, pp. 1–17). https://doi.org/10.2307/591920

50.

Handler

(2018). CHAPTER I. Is" identity" a useful cross-cultural concept? In Commemorations (pp. 27–40). Princeton University Press.

51.

Haque

Khan

S. A.

Butt

(2018). Pakistan’s Internet Landscape .

52.

Haraway

(1987). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Australian Feminist Studies, 2(4), 1–42.

53.

Harris

Bardey

A. C.

(2019). Do Instagram profiles accurately portray personality? An investigation into idealized online self-presentation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(04), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00871

54.

Hassan

Unwin

(2018). Understanding the darker side of ICTs: Gender, sexual harassment, and mobile devices in Pakistan. Information Technologies & International Development, 14, 1–17.

55.

Husain

(2018, March). Prevalent tendencies for mental disorders in Pakistan. Clínica y Salud. https://doi.org/10.5093/clysa2018a6

56.

Idemudia

E. C.

Raisinghani

M. S.

Adeola

Achebo

(2017). The effects of gender on the adoption of social media: An empirical investigation. Twenty-third Americas Conference on Information Systems, Boston. http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1277&context=amcis2017

57.

Inglehart

Norris

(2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge University Press.

58.

Johnson

A. G.

(2004). Patriarchy, the system. Women’s Lives: Multicultural Perspectives, 3, 25–32.

59.

Kambarami

(2006). Femininity, sexuality and culture: Patriarchy and female subordination in Zimbabwe. ARSRC.

60.

Kandiyoti

(1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender and Society, 2(3), 274–290.

61.

Karolak

Guta

(2015). Veiling and blogging: Social media as sites of identity negotiation and expression among Saudi women. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 16(2), 115–127. http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol16/iss2/7

62.

Kasana

(2016). Feminisms and the social media sphere. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 42(3), 236–249. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24365006

63.

Katz

J. E.

Rikatz

J. E.

Rice

R. E.

(2002). Social consequences of Internet use: Access, involvement, and interaction. MIT press

64.

Khan

T. J.

(2017). Professional development through social media applications : A study of female librarians in Pakistan Abstract. Information and Learning Science.

65.

Koskela

(2004). Webcams, TV shows and mobile phones: Empowering exhibitionism. Surveillance and Society, 2(2/3).

66.

Krane

(2001). We can be athletic and feminine, but do we want to? Challenging hegemonic femininity in women’s sport. Quest (Grand Rapids, Mich ), 53(1), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2001.10491733

67.

Lata

Jukariya

(2018). Role of media in empowering women. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(04), 1618–1623. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.704.182

68.

Piachaud

(2019). Technological innovations and social development in Asia. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2018.1546419

69.

Light

J. S.

(1995). The digital landscape: New space for women?{1}. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 2(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663699550021982

70.

Lindahl

(2007). Constituent power and reflexive identity: Towards an ontology of collective selfhood. In The paradox of constitutionalism (pp. –29). Oxford University Press.

71.

Livingstone

Mason

(2015). Sexual rights and sexual risks among youth online. London School of Economics and Political Science, commissioned by the European NGO alliance for child safety online (ENACSO).

72.

Lupton

Jutel

(2015). ‘It's like having a physician in your pocket!’A critical analysis of self-diagnosis smartphone apps. Social Science and Medicine, 133, 128–135.

73.

Magsi

Agha

Magsi

(2017). Understanding cyber bullying in Pakistani context: Causes and effects on young female university students in sindh province understanding cyber bullying in Pakistani context: Causes and effects on young female university students in sindh province habib. New Horizons, 2(1), 103–110.

74.

Mahmood

Q. K.

Zakar

M. Z.

(2018). Role of Facebook use in predicting bridging and bonding social capital of Pakistani university students. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 28(7), 856–873. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2018.1466750

75.

Malik

Dhir

Nieminen

(2016). Uses and gratifications of digital photo sharing on Facebook. Telematics and Informatics, 33(1), 129–138.

76.

Malterud

Siersma

V. D.

Guassora

A. D.

(2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760.

77.

Marshall

M. N.

(1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522–526.

78.

Marwick

A. E.

Blackwell

(2016). Best practices for conducting risky research and protecting yourself from online harassment (Data & Society Guide). New York: Data and Society Institute.

79.

Mastro

M. A.

(2016). The mainstream misrepresentation of muslim women in the media. What All Americans Should Know About Women in the Muslim World, 13, 13. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/islamandwomen/13

80.

Megarry

(2014, November). Online incivility or sexual harassment? Conceptualising women's experiences in the digital age. In Women's studies international forum (Vol. 47, pp. 46–55). Pergamon.

81.

Mendes

Ringrose

Keller

(2018). #Metoo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(2), 236–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506818765318

82.

Meyer

Cukier

(2006). Assessing the attack threat due to IRC channels. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (pp. 467–472). IEEE Computer Society.

83.

Murray

D. C.

(2015). Notes to self: The visual culture of selfies in the age of social media. Consumption Markets & Culture, 18(6), 490–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2015.1052967

84.

Murtiningsih

B. S. E.

Advenita

G. M.

Ikom

(2017). Representation of patriarchal culture in new media: A case study of news and advertisement on tribunnews.com. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 143. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2017.v8n3p143

85.

Musarrat

Masood

Rashid

Mazahir

(2017). Social networking, perceived loneliness and psychosocial well-being in adolescents. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 4(3), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTC.2017.8190959

86.

Nataliia

(2017). Identity crisis and its role in amplification of social devitalization of personality. Science and Education, 23(7), 126–129. https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2017-7-20

87.

Nova

F. F.

Rifat

M. R.

Saha

Ahmed

S. I.

Guha

(2019, January). Online sexual harassment over anonymous social media in Bangladesh. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (pp. 1–12).

88.

O’Donnell

Sweetman

(2018). Introduction: Gender, development and ICTs. Gender and Development, 26(2), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2018.1489952

89.

Olaniyan

Akpojivi

(2020). Transforming communication, social media, counter-hegemony and the struggle for the soul of Nigeria. Information, Communication & Society, 1–16.

90.

Papacharissi

(Ed.). (2010). A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites. Routledge.

91.

Papanek

(1973). Purdah: Separate worlds and symbolic shelter. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 15(3), 289–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001041750000712X

92.

Parkins

(2014). Gender and emotional expressiveness: An analysis of prosodic features in emotion expression. Pragmatics and Intercultural Communications, 5(1), 1–9.

93.

Perloff

R. M.

(2014). Social media effects on young women’s body image concerns: Theoretical perspectives and an agenda for research. Sex Roles, 71(11–12), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0384-6

94.

Plant

(1997). Zeros and ones: Digital women and the new technoculture (Vol. 4).

95.

Powell

(2007). Catharsis in psychology and beyond: A historic overview. The Primal Psychotherapy.

96.

Qaisrani

Liaquat

Khokhar

E. N.

(2016). Socio-economic and Cultural Factors of Violence against Women in Pakistan .

97.

Reichart Smith

Smith

K. D.

Blazka

(2017). Follow me, what's the harm: Considerations of catfishing and utilizing fake online personas on social media. Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport, 27, 32. https://doi.org/10.1123/jlas.2016-0020

98.

Ricoeur

(1990). Oneself as another (K. Blamey, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work was published 1990)

99.

Ridouani

(2011). The representation of Arabs and Muslims in western media. RUTA Comunicación, 3.

100.

Rosenmann

Safir

M. P.

(2006). Forced online: Push factors of Internet sexuality: A preliminary study of online paraphilic empowerment. Journal of Homosexuality, 51(3), 71–92.

101.

Schoemaker

(2016). Digital faith: Social media and the enactment of religious identity in Pakistan .

102.

Simpson

(2001). Murder, prostitution and patriarchy: Why serial killing is a feminist issue. Alternative Law Journal, 26(6), 278–280.

103.

Smith-Rosenberg

(1986). Writing history: Language, class, and gender. In Feminist studies/Critical studies (pp. 31–54). Palgrave Macmillan.

104.

Solomos

(2014). Stuart Hall: Articulations of race, class and identity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(10), 1667–1675. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2014.931997

105.

Stone

A. R.

(1996). The war of desire and technology at the close of the mechanical age. MIT press.

106.

Stone

(1981). Hume on identity: A defense. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 40(2), 275–282.

107.

Suler

J. R.

(2002). Identity management in cyberspace. Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 4(4), 455–459.

108.

Sultana

(2012). Patriarchy and women’s subordination: A theoretical analysis. Arts Faculty Journal, 4, 1–18.

109.

Theses

Jimenez

L. N.

(2014). Dominican scholar personality differences in social networking and online self- presentation .

110.

Tsikerdekis

Zeadally

(2014). Online deception in social media. Communications of the ACM, 57(9), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1145/2629612

111.

Turkle

(1999). Cyberspace and identity. Contemporary Sociology, 28(6), 643–648.

112.

Usman

(2011). Social stratification in a Punjabi village of Pakistan: The dynamics between caste, gender, and violence .

113.

Usman

(2016). cyber crime: Pakistani perspective. Islamabad Law Review, 1(3), 18-40.

114.

Valkenburg

P. M.

Schouten

A. P.

Peter

(2005). Adolescents ’ identity experiments on the internet. New Media and Society, 7(3), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444805052282

115.

Van House

N. A.

(2007). Flickr and public image-sharing: distant closeness and photo exhibition. In CHI'07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 2717–2722).

116.

van Oosten

J. M. F.

Vandenbosch

Peter

(2017). Gender roles on social networking sites: Investigating reciprocal relationships between Dutch adolescents’ hypermasculinity and hyperfemininity and sexy online self-presentations. Journal of Children and Media, 11(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2017.1304970

117.

Walther

J. B.

(1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 32(1), 3–43.

118.

Walther

J. B.

Slovacek

C. L.

Tidwell

L. C.

(2001). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Photographic images in long-term and short-term computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 28(1), 105–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365001028001004

119.

Welman

Kruger

Mitchell

(2005). Research methodology (pp. 35–40).

120.

Yusuf

(2014). Purdah: A religious practice or an instrument of exclusion, seclusion and isolation of women in a typical islamic setting of northern Nigeria. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 4(1), 238–245. www.aijcrnet.com

121.

Zahavi

(2005). Subjectiviy and selhood.

122.

Zhang

Sun

Zhu

Fang

(2010). Privacy and security for online social networks: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE network, 24(4), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2010.5510913

123.

Zoonen

L. V.

(2001). Feminist internet studies. Feminist Media Studies, 1(1), 67–72.

Virtual vs. Real Self: Gendered Presentation and Everyday Performance of Virtual Selfhood – A Case Study of Pakistan

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References