New distribution models have transformed television over the past decade, and Netflix’s One Day at a Time (2017–) stands out not only because it is a remake of a classic Norman Lear sitcom, but because it also foregrounds a Cuban American family. Using a radical contextual and relational approach, this study analyzes One Day at a Time from a cultural studies perspective using theoretical tools that arrive from critical Latina/o communication studies. We analyze the first season’s 13 episodes to demonstrate how storytelling is modified in the context of digital streaming. In this case, we argue that One Day at a Time offers an alternative to the flattening of difference far too common in Latina/o media. Instead, the show highlights the cultural specificity of this Cuban American family as a form of broad audience appeal as it negotiates sexual identity and immigration discourses within a contemporary social framework.
AmayaH. (2013). Citizenship excess: Latina/os, citizenship, and the nation.
New York, NY:
New York University Press.
2.
AnguianoC.CastañedaM. (2014).
Forging a path: Past and present scope of critical race theory and Latina/o critical race theory in communication studies.Review of Communication,
14(2), 107–124.
ArnoldS. (2016). Netflix and the myth of choice/participation/autonomy. In McDonaldK.Smith-RowseyD. (Eds.), The Netflix effect: Technology and entertainment in the 21st century (pp. 33–48).
New York, NY:
Bloomsbury Academic.
5.
Avila-SaavedraG. (2011).
Ethnic otherness versus cultural assimilation: U.S. Latino comedians and the politics of identity.Mass Communication and Society,
14(3), 271–291.
6.
BáezJ. (2014). Latina/o audiences as citizens: Bridging culture, media, and politics. In. DávilaA. RiveroY (Eds.), Contemporary Latina/o media: Production, circulation, politics (pp. 267–284).
New York, NY:
New York University Press.
7.
BáezJ. (2018). In search of belonging: Latinas, media, and citizenship.
Chicago, IL:
University of Illinois.
BeltránM. (2009). Latina/o stars in U.S. eyes: The making and meanings of film and TV stardom.
Chicago, IL:
University of Illinois Press.
10.
BeltránM. (2016). Latina/os on TV!: A proud (and ongoing) struggle over representation and authorship. In. AldamaF. L (Ed.), The Routledge companion to Latia/o popular culture (pp. 23–33).
New York, NY:
Routledge.
11.
BianculliD. (2016). The platinum age of television: From I Love Lucy to The Walking Dead, how TV became terrific.
New York, NY:
Anchor Books.
CalafellB. M.MoremanS. T. (2009).
Envisioning an academic readership: Latina/o performativities per the form of publication.Text and Performance Quarterly,
29(2), 123–130.
14.
CampbellS. (2007). The sitcoms of Norman Lear.
Jefferson, NC:
McFarland & Company.
15.
CepedaM. E.CasillasD. I. (2017). The Routledge companion to Latina/o media.
New York, NY:
Routledge.
16.
DávilaA. (2001). Latinos Inc. The marketing and making of a people.
Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
17.
del RíoE. (2006).
The Latina/o problematic: Categories and questions in media communication research. Communication Yearbook,
30, 387–429.
18.
del RíoE. (2017). Authenticity, appropriation, articulation: The cultural logic of Latinidad. In CepedaM. E.CasillasD. I. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to Latina/o media (pp. 9–21).
New York, NY:
Routledge.
19.
DowB. (1996). Prime-time feminism: Television, media culture, and the women’s movement since 1970.
Philadelphia, PA:
University of Pennsylvania Press.
20.
FarrB. (2016). Seeing blackness in prison: Understanding prison diversity on Netflix’s Orange is the New Black. In McDonaldK.Smith-RowseyD. (Eds.), The Netflix Effect: Technology and entertainment in the 21st century (pp. 155–169).
New York, NY:
Bloomsbury Academic.
MarkertJ. (2007).
The George Lopez Show: The same old Hispano?Bilingual Review,
28, 148–165.
31.
MastroD.GreenbergB. S. (2000).
The portrayal of racial minorities on prime time television.Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media,
44, 690–703.
32.
Molina-GuzmánI. (2010). Dangerous curves: Latina bodies in the media.
New York, NY:
New York University Press.
33.
Molina-GuzmánI. (2016).
#Oscarssowhite: How Stuart Hall explains how nothing changes in Hollywood and everything is changing. Critical Studies in Media Communication,
33(5), 438–454.
34.
Molina-GuzmánI. (2018). Latinas and Latinos on TV.
Tucson, AZ:
University of Arizona.
35.
MoranK. (2011). Listening to Latina/o youth: Television consumption within families.
New York, NY:
Peter Lang.
36.
MoranK. (2015).
“If they’re trying to say something about my culture … I’m confused”: Recognizing and resisting authenticity in Latino-themed television.Mass Communication and Society,
18(1), 79–96.
37.
Negrón-MuntanerF. (2014). The gang’s not all here: The state of Latinos in contemporary US media. In . DávilaA. RiveroY (Eds.), Contemporary Latina/o media: Production, circulation, politics (pp. 103–124).
New York, NY:
New York University Press.
RodríguezV.BeltránM. (2017). From the bronze screen to the computer screen: Latina/o web series and independent production. In. CepedaM. E. CasillasD. I (Eds.), The Routledge companion to Latina/o media (pp. 156–170).
New York, NY:
Routledge.
40.
RojasV.PiñonJ. (2014).
Spanish, English, or Spanglish? Media strategies and corporate struggles to reach the second and later generations of Latinos. The International Journal of Hispanic Media,
7, 1–15.
Smith-RowseyD. (2016). Imaginative indices and deceptive domains: How Netflix’s categories and genres redefine the “long tail”. In K. McDonaldSmith-RowseyD. (Eds.), The Netflix Effect: Technology and entertainment in the 21st century (pp. 61–79).
New York, NY:
Bloomsbury Academic.
43.
SpanglerL. (2003). Television women from Lucy to “Friends”: Fifty years of sitcoms and feminism.
Westport, CT:
Praeger Publishers.
44.
ValdiviaA. (2003). Radical hybridity: Latinas/os as the paradigmatic transnational post-subculture. In. MuggletonD. WeinzierlR (Eds.), The post-subcultures reader (pp. 151–165).
New York, NY:
Berg Publishers.
45.
ValdiviaA. (2010). Latina/os and the media.
Malden, MA:
Polity.
46.
ValdiviaA. (2013). Latinas on television and film: Exploring the limits and possibilities of inclusion. In CarterC.SteinerL.McLaughlinL. (Eds.), Routledge companion to media and gender (pp. 578–588).
Oxford, England:
Routledge.
47.
WalshK.FürshE.JeffersonB. (2008).
Beauty and the patriarchal beast: Sitcoms featuring mismatched couples.Journal of Popular Film and Television,
36(3), 123–132.
