The authors use a diasporic critique of Palestinian Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movements to argue that some of these movements undermine chances for two-state solutions. The authors, provide a nuanced way of evaluating both the theoretical and pragmatic dimensions of BDS. The argument is advanced that those in the diaspora have a nomadic positionality that allows them to uniquely critique venues such as (BDS), The Electronic Intifada, and Mondoweiss as they analyze the rhetoric of Palestinian nationalist movements. Diasporic critiques are able to trace the fissures, the ossifications, and the ruptures that take place in the Middle East as various acts of territoriality, deterritoriality, and reterritorialization take place simultaneously.
AgambenG. (2013a). Biopolitics and the rights of man. In CampbellT. C.SitzeA. (Eds.), Biopolitics: A reader (pp. 152–160).
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
3.
AgambenG. (2013b). Introduction to Homo Sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. In CampbellT. C.SitzeA. (Eds.), Biopolitics: A reader (pp. 53–64).
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
4.
CalafellB. M. (2005).
Pro (re-) claiming loss: A performance pilgrimage in search of Malintzin Tenépal.Text and Performance Quarterly,
25(1), 43–56. doi:10.1080/10462930500052327
5.
CalafellB. M. (2012). Love, loss, and immigration: Performative reverberations between a great grandmother and granddaughter. In DeChaineD. R. (Ed.), Border rhetorics: Citizenship and identity on the US-Mexico frontier (pp. 151–162).
Tuscaloosa, AL:
University of Alabama.
6.
CooperJ. E. (2015).
A diasporic critique of diasporism: The question of Jewishpolitical agency. Political Theory,
43(1), 80–102. doi:10.1177/0090591714543858
7.
CoreyF. C. (1998). The personal against the master narrative. In DaileyS. J. (Ed.), The future of performance studies: Visions and revisions (pp. 249–253).
Annandale, VA:
National Communication Association.
DikerD. (2015). Unmasking BDS: Radical roots, extremist ends.
Jerusalem, Israel:
Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. Retrieved from http://jcpa.org/unmasking-bds/
14.
DirlikA. (2004).
Intimate others: [Private] nations and diasporas in an age of globalization.Inter-Asia Cultural Studies,
5(3), 491–502. doi:10.1080/1464937042000288778
DrzewieckaJ. A.HalualaniR. (2002).
The structural-cultural dialectic of diasporic politics.Communication Theory,
12(3), 340–366. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00273.x
17.
DugardJ.ReynoldsJ. (2013).
Apartheid, international law and the occupied Palestinian territory.The European Journal of International Law,
24(3), 867–913. doi:10.1093/ejil/cht045
18.
EkoL. (2015).
The art of satirical deterritorialization: Shifting cartoons from real space to cyberspace in sub-Saharan Africa. TheInternational Communication Gazette,
77(3), 248–266. doi:10.1177/1748048514568759
Enck-WanzerD. (2013). Trashing the system: Social movement, intersectional rhetoric, and collective agency in the Young Lords Organization’s Garbage Offensive. In MorrisC.BrowneS. (Eds.), Readings on the rhetoric of social protest (pp. 222–241).
State College, PA:
Strata.
21.
GleyzonF.-X. (2016).
Deleuze and the grandeur of Palestine: Song of Earth and resistance. Journal ofCultural Research,
20(4), 398–416.
22.
HasianM.FloresL. A. (1997).
Children of the stones: The Intifada and the mythic creation of the Palestinian state.Southern Communication Journal,
62(2), 89–106. Retrieved from doi:10.1080/10417949709373044
23.
HegdeR. (2005).
Disciplinary spaces and globalization: A postcolonial unsettling.Global Media and Communication,
1(1), 59–62. doi:10.1177/174276650500100114
NajjarA. N. (2007, July). Cartoons as a site for the constructions of Palestinian Refugee identity. An exploratory study of cartoonist Naji al-Ali. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 31(3), 255–285.
31.
PeteetJ. (2016, Winter). Language matters: Talking about Palestine. Journal of Palestine, 45(2), 24–40.
ShomeR. (1996).
Postcolonial interventions in the rhetorical canon: An “other” view.Communication Theory,
6(1), 40–59. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00119.x
