This article complicates popular and scholarly discourses that understand the television laugh track as a crutch for bad jokes or a means to routinize audience response. By exploring early institutional histories, I demonstrate that broadcasters adopted the maligned technology to “fix” what was widely understood during the 1950s as the problem of the live studio audience. In aurally overriding—and sometimes altogether replacing—the studio audience, the laugh track allowed the industry to exorcise the capricious human element from the production process while still conjuring the parasocial aura that helped to both differentiate television from film and ensure the new medium’s smooth entrance into the home. After tracing this counter-history, I turn briefly to the new breed of laugh track-free comedies to illustrate the movement of the laugh track’s basic logics of liveness and parasociability into a constellation of formal and aesthetic devices central to the emergent genre.
Bergson, H. (1999). Laughter: An essay on the meaning of the comic. C. Brereton & F. Rothwell (Trans.). Los Angeles, CA: Green Integer. (Original work published in 1901).
2.
CantrilH.AllportW. (1986) The psychology of radio, Salem, NH: Ayer Company.(Original work published in 1935).
DunningJ. (1998) On the air: The encyclopedia of old-time radio, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5.
FeuerJ. (1983) The concept of live television: Ontology as ideology. In: KaplanE. (ed.) Regarding television: Critical approaches—An anthology, Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group AFI, pp. 12–22.
6.
FriesemD.QuagliaD.CraneE. (2014) Media now: A historical review of a media literacy curriculum. Journal of Media Literacy Education6(2): 35–55.
7.
Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment E. Jephcott (Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published in 1944).
8.
HortonD.WohlR. (1956) Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry19: 215–229.
9.
Humphrey, H. (1964, December 14). Video battle: Machine may have last laugh. Los Angeles Times.
10.
JenkinsH. (2006) Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Exploring participatory culture, New York, NY: New York University Press.
11.
KrassnerP. (1990) Blood on the laugh tracks. The Realist112: 2.
12.
LiebmanM. (1955, January 5) Audience reflexes can make or break telecast. Variety5: 104.
13.
ManderJ. (1978) Four arguments for the elimination of television, New York, NY: Harper Collins.
14.
MittellJ. (2015) Complex TV: The poetics of contemporary television storytelling, New York: New York University Press.
15.
NachmanG. (1998) Raised on radio: In quest of the lone ranger, Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
NelsonJ. (1992) The perfect machine: Television and the bomb, Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers.
ScannellP. (1996) Radio, television and modern life, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
26.
ScannellP. (2000) For-anyone-as-someone structures. Media, Culture and Society22(1): 5–24.
27.
SchaferR. (1977) The soundscape: Our sonic environment and the tuning of the world, Rochester, VT: Destiny Books.
28.
SeldesG. (1994) The public arts, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.(Original work published in 1956).
29.
Smiljanich, D. (1977, October 18). Edith’s rape is exploitation. St. Petersburg Times.
30.
SmithJ. (2008) Vocal tracks: Performance and sound media, Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
SpigelL. (1992) Make room for TV: Television and the family ideal in postwar America, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32.
SterlingC.KitrossJ. (2002) Stay tuned: A history of American broadcasting, 3rd ed. London, England: Routledge.
33.
Studio Audience. (1926). Wireless World, 19, 237.
34.
WilliamsP. (2000) Feeding off the past: The evolution of the television rerun. In: NewcombH. (ed.) Television: The critical view, 6th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 52–72.
35.
WylieM. (1950) Radio and television writing, New York, NY: Rinehart.
