Within communication studies today, the term labor is being employed more often and with more variety than at any time in the discipline’s history. What role did the Empire phenomenon play in this recent promotion of labor into such a fungible and expansive category? Contemporary theories and analyses of communication are largely dispensing with traditional oppositions like production and consumption, labor and leisure, or everyday life and any of the above. The influence of Hardt and Negri has left us less inclined to describe new forms of leisure and consumption in contrast to labor and more likely to find in them new modalities of labor.
AndrejevicM. (2007). iSpy: Surveillance and power in the interactive era. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
2.
ArendtH. (1958). The human condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BanksJ.HumphreysS. (2008). The labour of user co-creators: Emergent social network markets?Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies, 14, 401-418.
4.
BratichJ. Z. (2008). Activating the multitude: Audience powers and cultural studies. In GoldsteinP.MachorJ. L. (Eds.), New directions in American reception study (pp. 33-55). London, UK: Oxford University Press.
5.
CarloneD. (2008). The contradictions of communicative labor in service work. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 5, 158-179.
6.
DempseyS. E. (2009). NGOs, communicative labor, and the work of grassroots representation. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 6, 328-345.
7.
DempseyS. E.SandersM. L. (2010). Meaningful work? Nonprofit marketization and work/life imbalance in popular autobiographies of social entrepreneurship. Organization, 17, 437-459.
8.
Dyer-WhitefordN.de PeuterG. (2009). Games of Empire: Global capitalism and video games. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
9.
GrinnellC. K. (2009). From consumer to prosumer to produser: Who keeps shifting my paradigm? (We do!). Public Culture, 21, 577-598.
KrauseM.NolanM.PalmM.RossA. (Eds.). (2008). The university against itself: The NYU strike and the future of the academic workplace. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
LillieJ. (2006). Immaterial labor in the eBay community: Putting consumers to work in the network society. In HillisK.PetitM.EpleyN. S. (Eds.), Everyday eBay: Culture, collecting and desire (pp. 91-105). New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
MaxwellR.MillerT. (2006). The cultural labor issue. Social Semiotics, 16(1), 1-6.
17.
MillerT. (2010). Culture + labour = precariat. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 7(10), 96-99.
18.
MillsC. W. (1951). White Collar: The American Middle Classes. London: Oxford University Press.
19.
NielsonB. (2005). Provincialising the Italian effect. Cultural Studies Review, 11(2), 11-24.
20.
PalmM. (2007). Beyond the picket line: Academic organizing after the long NYU strike. Workplace: A Journal of Academic Labor, 14(1), 1-8.
PosterM. (2006). Information please: Culture and politics in the age of digital machines. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
23.
RossA. (2009). Nice work if you can get it: Life and labor in precarious times. New York, NY: New York University Press.
24.
SchillerD. (1996). Theorizing communication: A history. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
ShimpachS. (2005). Working watching: The creative and cultural labor of the media audience. Social Semiotics, 15, 343-360.
26.
TerranovaT. (2000). Free labor: Producing culture for the digital economy. Social Text, 63, 33-58.
27.
TerranovaT. (2004). Network culture: Politics for the Information Age. London, UK: Pluto Press.
28.
ZwickD.BonsuS. K.DarmodyA. (2008). Putting consumers to work: “Co-creation” and new marketing govern-mentality. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8, 163-196.
