Make magazine is a quarterly publication focused on do-it-yourself projects involving technology and innovation. The magazine also sponsors a biannual event, the Maker Faire, that brings “makers” together to share their knowledge. As a strategy for building audience loyalty and identification with the magazine, the Make products are skillfully crafted. However, they also invoke ideals such as environmentalism and nationalism in a potent mix that not only engages readers, but also represents an additional cultural demonstration of the phenomenon of technological utopianism.
AndersonC. (2010, February). Atoms are the new bits. Wired, 18(2), 59-67, 105-106.
4.
AndrejevicM. (2009). Critical media studies 2.0: An interactive upgrade. Interactions: Studies in Communication and Culture, 1(1), 35-51. doi:10.1386/iscc.1.1.35/1
5.
BorisE. (1986). Art and labor: Ruskin, Morris, and the Craftsman ideal in America. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
6.
BraineF. S. (1994). Technological utopias: The future of the next generation. Film and History, 24(1-2), 2-18.
7.
BreazealeK. (1994). In spite of women: Esquire magazine and the construction of the male consumer. Signs, 20, 1-22.
8.
ChakravarttyP.SchillerD. (2010). Neoliberal newspeak and digital capitalism in crisis. International Journal of Communication, 4, 670-692. doi:1932-8036/20100670
9.
ConnallyA. (2009). On the right track. Make, 18, 20.
10.
CrawfordM. (1990). Review essay: Arts and Crafts as an ideological myth. Journal of Architectural Education, 44(1), 59-61.
11.
DoctorowC. (2009). Love the machine, hate the factory. Make, 17, 14.
12.
DoughertyD. (2008a). The visible hand. Make, 16, 13.
KitchC. (2003). Generational identity and memory in American newsmagazines. Journalism, 4, 185-202. doi:10.1177/146488490342003
30.
KitchC. (2005). Pages from the past: History and memory in American magazines. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
31.
KleinJ. (2009). The civilized cat. Make, 20, 144-146.
32.
KlingR. (1996). Hopes and horrors: Technological utopianism and anti-utopianism in narratives of computerization. In KlingR. (Ed.)., Computerization and controversy: Value conflicts and social choices (2nd ed.), pp. 40-58. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
33.
KurlandE. (2008). Homebrew digital 3D movies. Make, 14, 50-56.
34.
LambourneL. (1980). Utopian craftsmen: The Arts and Crafts Movement from the Cotswolds to Chicago. Salt Lake City, UT: Peregrine Smith.
MachinD.van LeeuwenT. (2005). Language style and lifestyle: The case of a global magazine. Media, Culture, and Society, 27, 577-600. doi:10.1177/0163443705054151
PolitoR. (2008). One man’s junk, the same man’s treasure. Make, 13, 52-53.
48.
PompperD.SotoJ.PielL. (2007). Male body image and magazine standards: Considering dimensions of age and ethnicity. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84, 525-545.
49.
PotterW. J. (1996). An analysis of thinking and research about qualitative methods. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50.
RindfleishJ. (2005). Consuming the self: New age spirituality as “social product” in consumer society. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 8, 343-360. doi:10.1080/10253860500241930
51.
SavageA. (2009). Watch, learn, do. Make, 20, 11.
52.
SegalH. P. (2005). Technological utopianism in American culture (20th anniversary ed.). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
WebbS. M. (2006). The narrative of core traditional values in Reiman magazines. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 865-882.
55.
WinnerL. (2004). Sow’s ears from silk purses: The strange alchemy of technological visionaries. In SturkenM.ThomasD.Ball-RokeachS. J. (Eds.), Technological visions: The hopes and fears that shape new technologies (pp. 34-47). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
