This essay argues that CBS-TV’s C.S.I.: Crime Scene Investigation constructs a multiplicity of gazes for viewers with a particular focus on the forensic and abject gazes.The abject gaze is both repulsive and attractive in its focus on the physiological effects of death on the human body. The abject nature of the corpse is mediated by the investigators’ forensic gaze, which seeks to control crime, death, and abjection. In C.S.I., the forensic gaze also promotes the secondary gazes of voyeurism and forensic science as visual spectacle. Ultimately, the series’ forensic gaze can be associated with the prevalence and proliferation of biological identification technologies in modern society.
Adams, D.E. ( 2005, December 1). National DNA database is well-worth taxpayers’ investment. USA Today. p. 12A.
2.
Andrejevic, M. ( 2007). iSpy: Surveillance and power in the interactive era. Lawrence: University of Kansas.
3.
Beniger, J. ( 1989). The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of the information society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Benjamin, W. ( 1968). Illuminations (H. Arendt , Ed.; H. Zohn, Trans.) New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. (Original work published 1955)
5.
Black, J. ( 2001). The reality effect: Film culture and the graphic imperative . New York: Routledge.
6.
Bogard, W. ( 1996). The simulation of surveillance: Hypercontrol in telematic societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Caldwell, J.T. ( 1995). Televisuality: Style, crisis, and authority in American television. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
8.
Cole, L.A. ( 1996). The DNA mystique: The gene as a cultural icon. Bioscience, 46, 456-457.
9.
Creed, B. ( 1996). Horror and the monstrous-feminine: An imaginary abjection . In B. K. Grant (Ed.), The dread of difference: Gender and the horror film. (pp. 35-55). Austin : University of Texas Press.
10.
D’Cruze, S., Walklate, S., & Pegg, S. ( 2006). Murder: Social and historical approaches to understanding murder and murderers. Devon, UK: Willan.
11.
Denzin, N. ( 1995). The cinematic society: The voyeur’s gaze. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
12.
Doherty, T. ( 2003). Cultural studies and "Forensic Noir." Chronicle of Higher Education, 50(9), B15-16.
13.
Donald, J. ( 1995). The city, the cinema: Modern spaces. In C. Jenks (Ed.), Visual culture (pp. 77-95). London : Routledge.
14.
Edwards, T. ( 1997). Men in the mirror: Men’s fashion, masculinity and consumer society. London: Cassell .
15.
Evans, C., & Gammon, L. ( 1995). The gaze revisited, or reviewing queer viewing. In P. Burston, C. Richardson (Eds.), A queer romance: Lesbians, gay men and popular culture. (pp. 13-56). London: Routledge.
16.
Fass, P.S. ( 1992). Of genes and men. Reviews in American history, 20, 233-241.
17.
Foucault, M. ( 1973). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Pantheon. (Original work published 1961)
18.
Foucault, M. ( 1977). Discipline and punish: The birth o f the prison. (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Pantheon . (Original work published 1975)
19.
Freud, S. ( 1990). Beyond the pleasure principle. (J. Strachey, Trans.) . New York: Norton. (Original work published 1920)
20.
Gever, M. ( 2005). The spectacle of crime, digitized: CSI: Crime scene investigation and social anatomy. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 8, 445-463.
21.
Gitlin, T. Ed. (1986). Watching television. New York: Pantheon.
22.
Kay, L. ( 2002). Frills and thrills-Pleasurable dissections and responses to the abject: Female pathology and anthropology in Déjà Dead and Silent Witness. Mortality, 7, 155-170.
23.
Keveney, B. ( 2004, September 16). Crime pays for "CSI" franchise. USA Today, p. 1d. Retrieved June 16, 2005, from http://web.ebscohost.com.prxy3.ursus.maine.edu/ehost/search
24.
Kristeva, J. ( 1982). Powers of horror: An essay on abjection. (L. S. Roudiez , Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
25.
Lee, H.C., & Tirnady, F. ( 2003). Blood evidence: How DNA is revolutionizing the way we solve crimes. Cambridge, MA: Perseus .
26.
Lyon, D. ( 2006). The search for surveillance theories. In D. Lyon (Ed.), Theorizing surveillance: The panopticon and beyond. (pp. 3-20). Devon, UK: Willan.
27.
Marx, G.T. ( 2006). Soft surveillance: The growth of mandatory volunteerism in collecting personal information-"Hey Buddy Can You Spare a DNA?" In Torin Monahan (Ed.), Surveillance and security: Technological politics and power in everyday life. (pp. 37-56). London : Routledge.
28.
McCartan, L.M. ( 2007). Inevitable, influential, or unnecessary? Exploring the utility of genetic explanation for delinquent behavior. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 219-233.
29.
Meinwald, D. ( 1990). Memento mori: Death and photography in nineteenth century America. Retrieved March 15, 2007, from http://www.cmp.ucr.edu/exhibitions/memento_mori/default.html
30.
Morse, M. ( 1998). Virtualities, television, media art, and cyberculture . Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
31.
Mulvey, L. ( 1986). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. In P. Rosen (Ed.), Narrative, apparatus, ideology: A film theory reader. (pp. 198-209). New York: Columbia University Press.
32.
Neufield, P.J. ( 2001). Have you no sense of decency?Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 84, 189-202.
33.
Ramsland, K. ( 2001). The forensic science of C.S.I. New York: Berkeley Blvd. Books.
34.
Slater, D. ( 1995). Photography and modern vision: The spectacle of natural magic. In C. Jenks (Ed.), Visual culture. (pp. 218-237). New York: Routledge .
35.
Smith, D.E. ( 1990). The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
36.
Sturken, M., & Cartwright, L. (2001). Practices of looking: An introduction to visual culture. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
37.
Tait, S. ( 2006). Autoptic vision and the necrophillic imaginary of C.S .I. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 9(1), 45-62.
38.
Thomas, R.R. ( 2003). Detective fiction and the rise of forensic science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Turow, J. ( 2004). The answers are always in the body: Forensic pathology in U.S. crime programmes. Lancet, 364, 54-55.
40.
Williams, L. ( 1986). Film body: An implantation of perversions. In P. Rosen (Ed.), Narrative, apparatus, ideology: A film theory reader. (pp. 507-534). New York: Columbia University Press.
