This article examines reality television as a cultural form of what Gilles Deleuze calls “control societies.” For Deleuze, the shift from disciplinary societies (enclosures, bounded spaces, institutions) to control societies (circuits, modulated spaces, networked relations) is marked by a change in the processes of subjectification. The “postindividual” or the “dividual” is characterized by interchangeability, flexibility, and mobility (in accordance with post-Fordist forms of labor). On reality TV (RTV), subjects nowbecome variables to be replaced, reversed, and transformed. More specifically, individuals' subjective limits are often tested corporeally (challenges on Fear Factor) and affectively (prank shows). We can think of RTV less as a genre than as a loose assemblage of techniques and experiments. I examine a wide range of programs, concentrating on prank shows.
Andrejevic, M. (2003). Reality TV: The work of being watched. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
2.
Andrejevic, M. (2004, June). I looked east and west: Lateral surveillance on reality TV. Paper presented at the fifth annual international conference of Crossroads in Cultural Studies, Urbana, IL.
3.
Andrejevic, M. (2005). The work of watching one another: Lateral surveillance, risk, and governance. Surveillance and Society, 2(4), 479-497.
4.
Bratich, J. (2005). Amassing the multitude: Revisiting early audience studies. Communication Theory, 15(3), 242-265.
5.
Busk, M. (2002). Micropolitics: A political philosophy from Marx and beyond. In P. Pisters & M. Lord (Eds.), Micropolitics of media culture(pp. 103-123). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
6.
Butsch, R. (2000). The making of American audiences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Clough, P. (2004). Future matters: Technoscience, global politics, and cultural criticism. Social Text. 22(3), 1-23.
8.
Couldry, N. (2004). Teaching us to fake it: The ritualized norms of reality television. In S. Murray & L. Ouellette (Eds.), Reality television: Remaking television culture(pp. 57-74). New York: NYU Press.
9.
Deleuze, G. (1995a). Control and becoming. In Negotiations(M. Joughin, Trans., pp. 169-176). New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1990)
10.
Deleuze, G. (1995b). Postscript on control societies. In Negotiations(M. Joughin, Trans., pp. 177-182). New York: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1990)
11.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus(B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1980)
12.
Dyer-Witheford, N. (1999). Cyber-Marx: Cycles and struggles in high technology capitalism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
13.
Ellis, J. (2001). Mirror, mirror. Sight and Sound, 11(7), 12-12.
14.
Fetveit, A. (1999). Reality TV in the digital era: A paradox in visual culture?Media, Culture and Society, 21(6), 787-804.
15.
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison(A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage. (Original work published 1975)
16.
Griffen-Foley, B. (2004). From Tit-Bitsto Big Brother: A century of audience participation in the media. Media, Culture and Society, 26(4), 533-548.
17.
Grossberg, L. (1998). Victory of culture, Part 1 (Against the logic of mediation). Angelaki, 3(3), 3-30.
18.
Haralovich, M. B., & Trosset, M. W. (2004). “Expect the unexpected”: Narrative pleasure and uncertainty due to chance in Survivor. In S. Murray & L. Ouellette (Eds.), Reality television: Remaking television culture(pp. 75-96). New York: NYU Press.
19.
Hardt, M. (1998). The withering of civil society. In E. Kaufman& K. J. Heller (Eds.), Deleuze and Guattari: New mappings in politics, philosophy, and culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
20.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
Hartley, J. (2004). “Kiss Me Kat”: Shakespeare, Big Brother, and the taming of the self. In S. Murray & L. Ouellette (Eds.), Reality television: Remaking television culture(pp. 303-322). New York: NYUPress.
23.
Hay, J. (2004, May). Helping ourselves: Men in the kitchen. Paper delivered at Console-ing Passions Conference. New Orleans, LA.
24.
Hay, J., & Ouellette, L. (in press). Guidelines for living: Television and the government of everyday life. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
25.
Hearn, A. (2004, June). “Tom, a 22-year-old firefighter from Kansas”: On the incorporation of identity and the spectacularization of the “self” in the age of reality television. Paper presented at the fifth annual international conference of Crossroads in Cultural Studies, Urbana, IL.
26.
Hill, A., & Palmer, G. (2002). Editorial: Big Brother. Television and New Media, 3(3), 251-254.
27.
Holmes, S. (2004). “But this time you choose!”: Approaching the “interactive” audience in reality TV. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 7(2), 213-231.
28.
Kraszewski, J. (2004). Country hicks and urban cliques: Mediating race, reality, and liberalism on MTV's The Real World. In S. Murray& L. Ouellette (Eds.), Reality television: Remaking television culture(pp. 179-196). New York: NYU Press.
29.
Lewis, J. (2004). The meaning of real life. In S. Murray& L. Ouellette (Eds.), Reality television: Remaking television culture(pp. 288-302). New York: NYU Press.
30.
Lyotard, J.-F. L. (1989). Just gaming. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
31.
McCarthy, A. (2004). “Stanley Milgram, Allen Funt, and Me”: Postwar social science and the first wave of reality TV. In S. Murray & L. Ouellette (Eds.), Reality television: Remaking television culture(pp.19-39). New York: NYU Press.
32.
McCarthy, W. (2003). Hacking matter: Levitating chairs, quantum mirages, and the infinite weirdness of programmable atoms. New York: Basic Books.
33.
Murray, S. (2004). “I think we need a new name for it”: The meeting of documentary and reality TV. In S. Murray & L. Ouellette (Eds.), Reality television: Remaking television culture(pp. 40-56). New York: NYU Press.
34.
Murray, S.,& Ouellette, L. (Eds.). (2004). Reality television: Remaking television culture. New York: NYU Press.
35.
Negri, A. (1999). Insurgencies: Constituent power and the modern state. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
36.
Negri, A. (2004). Negri on Negri. London: Routledge.
37.
Ouellette, L. (2004). “Take responsibility for yourself”: Judge Judy and the neoliberal citizen. In S. Murray & L. Ouellette (Eds.), Reality television: Remaking television culture(pp. 231-250). New York: NYU Press.
38.
Palmer, G. (2002). Big Brother: An experiment in governance. Television and New Media, 3(3), 295-310.
39.
Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Scannell, P. (2002). Big Brother as a television event. Television & New Media, 3(3), 271-282.
41.
Smith, D. W. (1998). The place of ethics in Deleuze's philosophy: Three questions of immanence. In E. Kaufman& K. J. Heller (Eds.), Deleuze and Guattari: Newmappings in politics, philosophy, and culture(pp.251-269). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
42.
Tincknell, E.,& Raghuram, P. (2002). Big Brother: Reconfiguring the “active” audience of cultural studies?European Journal of Cultural Studies, 5(2), 199-215.
43.
Wilson, P. (2004). Jamming Big Brother: Webcasting, audience intervention, and narrative activism. In S. Murray& L. Ouellette (Eds.), Reality television: Remaking television culture(pp. 323-343). New York: New York University Press.
44.
Virno, P. (2004). A grammar of the multitude. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
