This analysis explores the connection between globalization and national identity in cultural expressions of environmental sovereignty. Competing claims to resources in the Brazilian Amazon reflect changing notions of state authority and the role of indigenous citizens in protection of biodiversity. The debate between Brazilian state governments and the Yanomami Indians and seringueiros (Brazilian Rubber Tapper communities) illustrates the complex interaction of national identity and expressions of local culture in a global ecological context.
Blaney, D., and N. Inayatullah. 1998. International political economy as a culture of competition. In Culture in world politics,edited by D. Jacquine-Berdal, A. Oros, and M. Verweij. New York: St. Martin's.
4.
Bull, H. 1977. The anarchical society. New York: Columbia University Press.
5.
Clancy, E. 1998. The tragedy of the global commons. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies5:601-619.
6.
Conca, K. 1994. Rethinking the ecology-sovereignty debate. Millenium: Journal of International Studies23 (3): 701-711.
de Campos Mello, V. 1996. Economic globalization and the contradictions of “environmental management”: The case of the Brazilian Amazon. Newsletter of the Working Group on Environmental Studies 16. Retrieved from http://www.iue.it/WGES/Iss16/campos.html.
10.
de la Torre, L. C. 1993. Fragments of the participation of the Pro Tempore Secretary of the Amazonian Cooperation Treaty. Ordinary Assembly of the Amazonian Parliament Proceedings. Retrieved from http://www.webmediaven.com/parlamaz/amazon_eng.html.
11.
DeLuca, K. 1999. Image politics: The new rhetoric of environmental activism. New York: Guilford Press.
12.
Deudney, D. 1996. Ground identity: Nature, place, and space in nationalism. In The return of culture and identity in IR theory, edited by Y. Lapid and F. Kratochwil. London: Lynne Rienner.
13.
Dolzer, R. 1998. Global environmental issues: The genuine area of globalization. Journal of Transnational Law and Policy7:157-179.
14.
Eley, G. 1992. Nations, publics, and political cultures: Placing Habermas in the nineteenth century. In Habermas and the public sphere, edited by C. Calhoun. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
Elliot, L. 1998. The global politics of the environment. New York: New York University Press.
16.
Featherstone, M., ed. 1990. Global culture: Nationalism, globalization and modernity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Fraser, N. 1993. Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In The phantom public sphere, edited by B. Robbins. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
18.
Garside, R. 1998. Urgent action: Guarani community of Potrero Guaçu face eviction. Amanaka'a Amazon network, 26 July. Retrieved from http://www.amanakaa.org/guarani.htm.
Griffith, R., ed. 1992. Major problems in American history since 1945. Lexington, MA: DC Heath.
21.
Habermas, J. 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
Hall, S. 1997. The local and the global: Globalization and ethnicity. In Culture, globalization and the world-system: Contemporary conditions for the representation of identity,edited by A. King. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
23.
Hurrell, A. 1994. A crisis of ecological viability? Global environmental change and the nation state. Political Studies42:146-165.
24.
Kamieniecki, S. 1991. Political mobilization, agenda building and international environmental policy. Journal of International Affairs44 (2): 338-358.
25.
Kamieniecki, S. 1993. Emerging forces in global environmental politics. In Environmental politics in the international arena: Movements, parties, organizations, and policy, edited by S. Kamieniecki. Albany: State University of New York Press.
26.
Keck, M., and K. Sikkink. 1998. Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27.
Laferrière, E. 1996. Emancipating International Relations theory: An ecological perspective. Millenium: Journal of International Studies25 (1): 53-75.
Palmer, G. 1992. New ways to make international environmental law. American Journal of International Law86:259-283.
35.
Paolini, A. 1997. Globalization. In At the edge of international relations: Postcolonialism, gender and dependency, edited by P. Darby. London: Pinter.
Serviço Brasileiro de Justiça e Paz. 1993. Update on massacre of Yanomami Indians. News from Brazil 93. Retrieved 26 August from http://www.oneworld.org/sejup/93.html.
Taylor, B., H. Hadsell, L. Lorentzen, and R. Scarce. 1993. Grass-roots resistance: The emergence of popular environmental movements in less affluent countries. In Environmental politics in the international arena: Movements, parties, organizations, and policy, edited by S. Kamieniecki. Albany: State University of New York Press.
48.
Vogler, J., and M. Imber, eds. 1996. The environment and international relations. London: Routledge.
49.
Wapner, P. 1995. The state and environmental challenges: A critical exploration of alternatives to the state-system. Environmental Politics4 (1): 44-69.
