In the Public Interest? The State of Local Television Programming Fifteen Years after Deregulation

Abstract

The authors' research tests the assertion that deregulation of broadcasting has caused a decline in the amount of local non–news programming produced by commercial television stations. Locally produced programming from stations in three markets was analyzed for the years 1976 (before deregulation), 1985 (during deregulation), and 1997. The markets were selected to give a broad representation of market size. Local programlistings were taken fromsystematically selected back issues of TV Guide to formconstructed weeks for analysis. The number of public affairs programs airing in the markets has declined. There was also a significant decrease in the number of hour-long programs aired and a significant relationship across all markets between the year studied and the days of the week on which a programaired. The analysis suggests that stations have not maintained their commitment to local public affairs programming. A recent Gore Commission report adds relevance to these findings.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Action for Children's Television v. FCC, 821 F.2d 741 (1987).

Adams, William C. 1980. Local television news coverage and the central city. Journal of Broadcasting 24:253-265.

Bacon's directory of television and radio stations. 1997. Chicago: Bacon's Information, Inc.

Bagdikian, Ben . 1985. The U.S. media: Supermarket or assembly line? Journal of Communication 35:97-110.

Bensman, Marvin . 1990. Broadcast/cable regulation. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

Center for Media Education . 1998. Five weeks and counting: Gore Commission report on the future of broadcasting and the public interest to be released on December 18. Retrieved 20 December 1999 from http://www.cme.org/cd1119.html.

Deregulation comes to television; FCC in unanimous vote follows pattern of radio dereg for commercial and public TV. 1984. Broadcasting, 2 July, 31-32.

Federal Communications Commission (FCC) . 1960. Report re En Banc programming inquiry, 44 F.C.C. 2203-2203, 2314-2314.

Federal Communications Commission (FCC) . 1984. Revision of programming and commercialization policies, ascertainment requirements, and program log requirements for commercial television stations, 98 F.C.C.2d 74-74.

10.

McChesney, Robert . 1999. Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times. New York: New Press.

11.

McKean, M. L. , and V. A. Stone . 1992. Deregulation and competition: Explaining the absence of local broadcast news operations. Journalism Quarterly 69:713-723.

12.

Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ v. FCC, 779 F.2d 702 (1985).

13.

Pinellas Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 230 F.2d 204, 206 cert denied, 350 U.S. 1007, DC Cir (1956).

14.

Postman, Neil , and Steve Powers . 1992. How to watch TV news. New York: Penguin.

15.

Riffe, Daniel , C. Aust , and Steven Lacy . 1993. The effectiveness of random, consecutive day and constructed week sampling in newspaper content analysis. Journalism Quarterly 70:133-139.

16.

Slattery, Karen , and Ernest Hakanen . 1994. Sensationalism versus public affairs content of local TV news: Pennsylvania revisited. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 38:19-33.

17.

Slattery, Karen , Ernest Hakanen , and Mark Doremus . 1996. The expression of localism: Local TV news coverage in the new video marketplace. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 40:403-413.