Discourse produced in 1996 by journalists and journalism educators on the Internet was analyzed using a philosophical method called casuistry to see how they evaluated the Janet Cooke case fifteen years later. This analysis shows that these journalists, in reconsidering the Janet Cooke case, tended to favor scaling back tentative exceptions to the paradigm of journalistic lying that had emerged in response to the New Journalism of the 1960s and the Watergate investigation in the 1970s. This analysis illustrates the gradual refinement of moral concepts in journalism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bishop, Ronald
. 1999. From behind the walls: Boundary work by news organizations in their coverage of Princess Diana's death. Journal of Communication Inquiry23 (1): 90-112.
2.
Blondheim, Menahem. 1989. The news frontier: Control and management of American news in the age of the telegraph. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.
3.
Boeyink, David E.1992. Casuistry: A case-based method for journalists.Journal of Mass Media Ethics7 (2): 107-120.
4.
Borden, Sandra L.1995. Gotcha! Decidingwhen sources are fair game.Journal of Mass Media Ethics10 (4): 223-235.
5.
Borden, Sandra L.1999. Character as a safeguard for journalists using case-based ethical reasoning.International Journal of Applied Philosophy13 (1): 93-104.
6.
Cooke, Janet
. 1980. Jimmy's world: 8-year-old heroin addict lives for a fix.The Washington Post, 28 September.
7.
Dicken-Garcia, Hazel
. 1989.Journalistic standards in nineteenth-century America. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
8.
Eason, David L.1988. On journalistic authority: The Janet Cooke scandal. InMedia, myths, and narratives: Television and the press, edited by James W. Carey, 205-227. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
The end of the ‘Jimmy’ story. 1981.The Washington Post, 16 April.
10.
Ettema, James S.
, and Whitney, D. Charles, with Daniel B. Wackman. 1997. Professional mass communicators. InSocial meanings of news: A text-reader, edited by Dan Berkowitz, 31-50. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Jonsen, Albert R.
, and Stephen Toulmin. 1988.The abuse of casuistry: A history of moral reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press.
McChesney, Robert W.1997. Corporate media and the threat to democracy, The Open Media Pamphlet Series. New York: Seven Stories Press.
14.
Reese, Stephen D.1997. The news paradigm and the ideology of objectivity: A socialist at the Wall Street Journal.InSocial meanings of news: A text-reader, edited by Dan Berkowitz, 420-440. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Rosen, Jay
. 1993. Beyond objectivity: It is a myth, an important one, but often cripplingand it needs to be replaced with a more inspiring concept.Nieman Reports.
16.
Sager, Mike
. 1996. Janet's world.GQ, June.
17.
Sommerville, Johann P.1988. The “new art of lying”: Equivocation, mental reservation, and casuistry. InConscience and casuistry in early modern Europe, edited by Edmund Leites, 159-184. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Tucher, Andie
. 1994.Froth & scum: Truth, beauty, goodness, and the ax murder in America's first mass medium. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
19.
Walsh, Edward
. 1981. “Jimmy's world” is a dominant topic as nation's newspaper editors meet. The Washington Post, 23 April.
20.
Winch, Samuel P.1997.Mapping the cultural space of journalism: How journalists distinguish news from entertainment. Westport, CT: Praeger.
21.
Zelizer, Barbie
. 1997. Journalists as interpretive communities. Insocial meanings of news: A text-reader, edited by Dan Berkowitz, 401-419. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
