This paper examines HBO's The Sopranos in the context of several industrial factors. I begin with the series'generic inscription. As a gangster program, The Sopranos comes to us in the form of a pedigreed pre-sold product, a television text of esteemed cinematic lineage. This leads to the examination of branding. In order to corral The Sopranos into the slogan, “It's Not TV, It's HBO,” HBO seeks to differentiate its product from lowest common denominator, broadcast fare. The separation results in the construction of the “quality” brand, a problematic concept academics have linked to demographics. HBO's branding strategy has also intensified the claim of competition between pay cable and broadcast television in popular discourse. This claim is problematized by the ratings gathering methodology of A.C. Nielsen and by AOL Time Warner's tiering strategies. By examining the aforementioned strategies, I uncover the materialist— rather than auteurist—foundations of The Sopranos.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blumenthal, Howard J.
, and Oliver R.Goodenough. 1998. This business of television.2ed.New York: Billboard Books.
2.
Boddy, William
. 1990. Fifties television: The industry and its critics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
3.
Dempsey, John
. 1999. HBO renews three skeins. Daily Variety, 22 September, 3-3.
4.
Feuer, Jane
. 1992. Genre study and television. In Channels of discourse, reassembled: Television and contemporary criticism, 2d ed., edited by Robert C. Allen. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
5.
Feuer, Jane
, Paul Kerr, and Tise Vahimagi, eds. 1984. MTM “quality television.”London: British Film Institute.
6.
Garay, Ronald
. 1988. Cable television: A reference guide to information.NewYork: Greenwood.
7.
Gershon, Richard A.1990. Pay cable television: A regulatory history. Communications and the Law12:3-26.
8.
Graser, Marc
. 1998. B-G names Baron biz veep. Daily Variety, 24 September, 8-8.
9.
Hamilton, Kendall
, and Corie Brown. 1999. HBO goes where the big networks fear to tread— And rules the summer. Newsweek, 21 June, 68-68.
10.
Kaminsky, Stuart M.1985. American television genres. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
11.
Lieberman, Paul
. 1999. HBO's gritty prison drama oz finds its cast and writer-creator takinga hard look at the hard time known as life. Los Angeles Times, 8 August.
Littleton, Cynthia
, and Vanessa Torres. 1999. Vets react to Emmy nom fest. Daily Variety,23 July, 1-1.
15.
Lowry, Brian
. 1999a. At HBO, life after Larry ain't so bad. Los Angeles Times, 15 May, 1F-1F.
16.
Lowry, Brian
. 1999b. Emmy nominations. Los Angeles Times, 23 July, 1F-1F.
17.
Lowry, Brian
. 1999c. Adjusting the off-color contrast. Los Angeles Times, 29 September, 4-4.
18.
Mair, George
. 1988. Inside HBO: The billion dollar war between HBO, Hollywood, and the home video revolution. New York: Dodd, Mead.
19.
Marconi, Joe
. 1993. Beyond branding: How savvy marketers build brand equity to create products and open new markets. Chicago: Probus.
20.
Meehan, Eileen R.1990. Why we don't count: The commodity audience. In Logics of television: Essays in cultural criticism, edited by Pat Mellencamp. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
21.
Murphy, John M.
, ed. 1987. Branding: A key marketing tool. New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
Newcomb, Horace
, and Robert S. Alley. 1983. The producer's medium: Conversations with creators of American TV. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Nielsen Media Research. 2000. What TV ratings really mean [Online]. Available: http://www.nielsenmedia.com/whatratingsmean.
24.
Peyser, Marc
. 2000. Why The Sopranos sing. Newsweek, 2 April, 48-57.
25.
Pursell, Chris
. 1999. HBO puts films to the fire. Variety, 25 October, 23-23.
26.
Rochlin, Margy, comp.1999. The new season/television and radio: Looking ahead; Sopranos, sex, and a Sunday standby. New York Times, 12 September, 25[2].
27.
Schatz, Thomas
. 1987. St. Elsewhere and the evolution of the ensemble series. In Television: The critical view, 4th ed., edited by Horace Newcomb. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
Schneider, Michael
. 2000. TV's consolidation merges into 2000. Variety, 10 January, 97-97.
29.
Sterngold, James
. 1999. Faltering drama, heal thyself. Los Angeles Times, 25 August, 1E-1E.
30.
Streeter, Thomas
. 1996. Selling the air: A critique of the policy of commercial broadcasting in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Time Warner Entertainment
. 2000. Form-type: 10-K [Online]. Retrieved 30 March from LexisNexis (http://www.lexis-nexis.com).
32.
Time Warner Inc.2000. Time Warner companies lead this year's Emmy nominations. Retrieved 20 July from the World Wide Web: http://cgi.timewarner.com/cgi-in/corp/news/index.cgi?template=article&article_id=200284.
33.
Wasko, Janet
. 1994. Hollywood in the information age: Beyond the silver screen. Austin: University of Texas Press.
34.
Weinraub, Bernard
. 1999. Pushingthe bleepingenvelope: Fox flirts with serious outrage. The New York Times, 12 August, 1E-1E.
35.
Williams, Betsy
. 1994. “North to the future”: Northern Exposure and quality television. In Television: The critical view, 5th ed., edited by Horace Newcomb. New York: Oxford University Press.
