Emissions must be quantified in order to be priced. For emission sources that are challenging to measure, such as methane pollution from the natural gas supply chain, random sampling may be employed to reduce measurement costs. This paper develops a novel approach to emissions pricing that involves taking measurements at a randomly selected subset of each firm’s facilities to construct firm-level estimates of emissions. A theoretical model demonstrates that under realistic assumptions, applying an emissions price to these firm-level estimates preserves the efficiency benefits of emissions pricing with comprehensive monitoring. A simulation calibrated to be representative of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas industry predicts that this approach can achieve net climate mitigation benefits roughly two orders of magnitude greater than measurement costs.
AlvarezRamón A.Zavala-AraizaDanielLyonDavid R., et al. 2018. “Assessment of Methane Emissions from the US Oil and Gas Supply Chain.”Science361: 186–88.
2.
AndersonSoren T.KelloggRyanSalantStephen W.2018. “Hotelling under Pressure.”Journal of Political Economy126 (3): 984–1026.
3.
AthertonEmmalineRiskDavidFougèreChelsea, et al. 2017. “Mobile Measurement of Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Developments in Northeastern British Columbia, Canada.”Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics17 (20): 12405–420.
4.
BaumolWilliam J.OatesWallace E.BawaVijay S.BradfordDavid F.1988. The Theory of Environmental Policy. Cambridge University Press.
5.
BlundellWesleyGowrisankaranGautamLangerAshley. 2020. “Escalation of Scrutiny: The Gains from Dynamic Enforcement of Environmental Regulations.”American Economic Review110 (8): 2558–85.
6.
BoomhowerJudson. 2019. “Drilling Like There’s No Tomorrow: Bankruptcy, Insurance, and Environmental Risk.”American Economic Review109 (2): 391–426.
7.
BurtrawDallasSzambelanSarah Jo. 2010. US Emissions Trading Markets for SO2 and NOx. Routledge.
8.
CarlsonCurtisBurtrawDallasCropperMaureenPalmerKaren L. 2000. “Sulfur Dioxide Control by Electric Utilities: What are the Gains from Trade?”Journal of Political Economy108 (6): 1292–326.
9.
CastellanosKenneth AustinHerrnstadtEvan. 2022. “How CBO Analyzes the Effects of Charging the Oil and Gas Industry for Methane Emissions.” Technical Report, Congressional Budget Office.
10.
ChenZhenlinEl AbbadiSahar H.SherwinEvan D., et al. 2024. “Comparing Continuous Methane Monitoring Technologies for High-Volume Emissions: A Single-blind Controlled Release Study.”ACS ES&T Air.
11.
CicalaSteveHémousDavidOlsenMorten G.2022. “Adverse Selection as a Policy Instrument: Unraveling Climate Change.” Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
12.
CochardFrançoisWillingerMarcXepapadeasAnastasios. 2005. “Efficiency of Nonpoint Source Pollution Instruments: An Experimental Study.”Environmental and Resource Economics30 (4): 393–422.
13.
DowdBrian M.PressDanielHuertosMarc Los. 2008. “Agricultural Nonpoint Source Water Pollution Policy: The Case of California’s Central Coast.”Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment128 (3): 151–61.
14.
DufloEstherGreenstoneMichaelPandeRohiniRyanNicholas. 2013. “Truth-telling by Third-party Auditors and the Response of Polluting Firms: Experimental Evidence from India.”The Quarterly Journal of Economics128 (4): 1499–545.
15.
EarnhartDietrichFriesenLana. 2021. “Use of Competitive Endogenous Audit Mechanisms by Federal and State Inspectors within Environmental Protection Agencies.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management109: 102476.
16.
EIA. 2022. Annual Energy Outlook 2022 with Projections to 2050. US Energy Information Administration.
17.
EPA. 2023. Supplementary Material for the Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Rulemaking, “Standards of Performance for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources: Oil and Natural Gas Sector Climate Review”. Environmental Protection Agency.
18.
EPA. 2024. “40 CFR Part 98 Finale Rule: Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule: Revisions and Confidentiality Determinations for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems.” Federal Register 89(94). Environmental Protection Agency.
19.
FarzinY. HosseinKaplanJonathan D.2004. “Nonpoint Source Pollution Control under Incomplete and Costly Information.”Environmental and Resource Economics28 (4): 489–506.
20.
GilpatricScott M.VosslerChristian A.McKeeMichael. 2011. “Regulatory Enforcement with Competitive Endogenous Audit Mechanisms.”The RAND Journal of Economics42 (2): 292–312.
21.
GonzálezPatrick. 2011. “Certification as a Rationale for Voluntary Agreements.” Working Papers 117827, University of Laval, Center for Research on the Economics of the Environment, Agri-food, Transports and Energy (CREATE).
22.
Gorchov NegronAlan M.KortEric A.ConleyStephen A.SmithMackenzie L.2020. “Airborne Assessment of Methane Emissions from Offshore Platforms in the US Gulf of Mexico.”Environmental Science & Technology54 (8): 5112–20.
23.
HansenLars Gårn. 1998. “A Damage Based Tax Mechanism for Regulation of Non-point Emissions.”Environmental and Resource Economics12 (1): 99–112.
24.
HansenLars Gårn. 2002. “Regulation of Non-point Emissions–A Variance Based Mechanism.”Environmental and Resource Economics21 (4): 303–316.
25.
HowarthRobert W.SantoroReneeIngraffeaAnthony. 2011. “Methane and the Greenhouse-gas Footprint of Natural Gas from Shale Formations.”Climatic Change106 (4): 679.
26.
HungMing-FengShawDaigee. 2005. “A Trading-ratio System for Trading Water Pollution Discharge Permits.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management49 (1): 83–102.
27.
ICF. 2016. “Economic Analysis of Methane Emission Reduction Potential from Natural Gas Systems.” Techical Report, ICF International. Prepared for ONE Future Inc.
28.
IJzermansRutgerJonesMatthewWeidmannDamienvan de KerkhofBasRandellDavid. 2024. “Long-term Continuous Monitoring of Methane Emissions at an Oil and Gas Facility Using a Multi-open-path Laser Dispersion Spectrometer.”Scientific Reports14 (1): 623.
29.
IPCC. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
30.
IRA. 2022. Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. Public Law 117-167, Section 60113.
31.
KaplanJonathan D.HowittRichard E.FarzinY. Hossein. 2003. “An Information-theoretical Analysis of Budget-constrained Nonpoint Source Pollution Control.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management46 (1): 106–130.
32.
LowellDanaJonesBrianSeamondsDavidRussellPye. 2016. “Analysis of Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Proposed New Safety Rules: Pipeline Blowdown Emissions and Mitigation Options.” Technical Report, M. J. Bradley and Associates LLC. Prepared for Environmental Defense Fund and Pipeline Safety Trust.
33.
MarcheseAnthony J.VaughnTimothy L.ZimmerleDaniel J., et al. 2015. “Methane Emissions from United States Natural Gas Gathering and Processing.”Environmental Science & Technology49 (17): 10718–27.
34.
MarksLevi. 2022. “The Abatement Cost of Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Production.”Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists9 (2): 165–98.
35.
MayfieldErin N.RobinsonAllen L.CohonJared L.2017. “System-wide and Superemitter Policy Options for the Abatement of Methane Emissions from the US Natural Gas System.”Environmental Science & Technology51 (9): 4772–80.
36.
MitchellAustin L.TkacikDaniel S.RoscioliJoseph R., et al. 2015. “Measurements of Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Gathering Facilities and Processing Plants: Measurement Results.”Environmental Science & Technology49 (5): 3219–27.
37.
MonteroJuan-Pablo. 2005. “Pollution Markets with Imperfectly Observed Emissions.”RAND Journal of Economics36 (3): 645–60.
38.
MontgomeryW. David. 1972. “Markets in Licenses and Efficient Pollution Control Programs.”Journal of Economic Theory5 (3): 395–418.
39.
MunningsClaytonKrupnickAlan. 2017. “Comparing Policies to Reduce Methane Emissions in the Natural Gas Sector.” Technical Report, Resources for the Future.
40.
NewellRichard G.StavinsRobert N.2003. “Cost Heterogeneity and the Potential Savings from Market-based Policies.”Journal of Regulatory Economics23 (1): 43–59.
41.
OmaraMarkSullivanMelissa R.LiXiangSubramanianR.RobinsonAllen L.PrestoAlbert A.2016. “Methane Emissions from Conventional and Unconventional Natural Gas Production Sites in the Marcellus Shale Basin.”Environmental Science & Technology50 (4): 2099–107.
42.
PoeGregory L.SchulzeWilliam D.SegersonKathleenSuterJordan F.VosslerChristian A.2004. “Exploring the Performance of Ambient-based Policy Instruments When Nonpoint Source Polluters Can Cooperate.”American Journal of Agricultural Economics86 (5): 1203–210.
43.
RobertsonAnna M.EdieRachelSnareDustin, et al. 2017. “Variation in Methane Emission Rates from Well Pads in Four Oil and Gas Basins with Contrasting Production Volumes and Compositions.”Environmental Science & Technology51 (15): 8832–40.
44.
SchmutzlerArminGoulderLawrence H.1997. “The Choice between Emission Taxes and Output Taxes under Imperfect Monitoring.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management32 (1): 51–64.
45.
SegersonKathleen. 1988. “Uncertainty and Incentives for Nonpoint Pollution Control.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management15 (1): 87–98.
46.
SubramanianR.WilliamsLaurie L.VaughnTimothy L., et al. 2015. “Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Compressor Stations in the Transmission and Storage Sector: Measurements and Comparisons with the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program Protocol.”Environmental Science & Technology49 (5): 3252–61.
47.
SuterJordan F.VosslerChristian A. 2013. “Towards an Understanding of the Performance of Ambient Tax Mechanisms in the Field: Evidence from Upstate New York Dairy Farmers.”American Journal of Agricultural Economics96 (1): 92–107.
48.
TynerDavid R.JohnsonMatthew R.2018. “A Techno-economic Analysis of Methane Mitigation Potential from Reported Venting at Oil Production Sites in Alberta.”Environmental Science & Technology52 (21): 12877–85.
49.
Van BenthemArthurKerrSuzi. 2013. “Scale and Transfers in International Emissions Offset Programs.”Journal of Public Economics107: 31–46.
50.
VosslerChristian A.PoeGregory L.SchulzeWilliam D.SegersonKathleen. 2006. “Communication and Incentive Mechanisms Based on Group Performance: An Experimental Study of Nonpoint Pollution Control.”Economic Inquiry44 (4): 599–613.
51.
WernerKarl D.QiuWenfeng. 2020. “Hard to Measure Well: Can Feasible Policies Reduce Methane Emissions?” Working Paper, Energy Institute at Haas.
52.
XepapadeasAnastasios. 2011. “The Economics of Non-point-source Pollution.”Annual Review of Resource Economics3 (1): 355–73.
53.
Zavala-AraizaDanielAlvarezRamón A.LyonDavid R., et al. 2017. “Super-emitters in Natural Gas Infrastructure are Caused by Abnormal Process Conditions.”Nature Communications8: 14012.
54.
Zavala-AraizaDanielLyonDavid R.AlvarezRamon A., et al. 2015. “Reconciling Divergent Estimates of Oil and Gas Methane Emissions.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112 (51): 15597–602.
55.
ZimmerleDaniel J.WilliamsLaurie L.VaughnTimothy L., et al. 2015. “Methane Emissions from the Natural Gas Transmission and Storage System in the United States.”Environmental Science & Technology49 (15): 9374–83.
56.
ZouEric Yongchen. 2021. “Unwatched Pollution: The Effect of Intermittent Monitoring on Air Quality.”American Economic Review111 (7): 2101–126.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
