This study examines the effect of privatization on the pollution emission intensity of companies by exploiting the quasi-natural experimental ownership reforms of state-owned enterprises in China. By matching corporate pollution emissions with firm-level microdata from 1998 to 2007, we employ a difference-in-differences strategy to identify the environmental effects of privatization. Our findings reveal a significant increase in corporate SO2 intensity and smoke and dust intensity by 12.5 percent and 12.3 percent, respectively. The magnitude of the effect varies significantly across regions and differs by the nature of ownership. We observe significant changes in production technologies and environmental mitigation strategies in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) after privatization. Privatized SOEs undergo major changes in their corporate energy input structures and tend to make a significant strategic shift in their approach to pollution mitigation, investing less in environmental innovation in production and focusing more on end-of-pipe treatments.
AmitiMaryKoningsJozef. 2007. “Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evidence from Indonesia.”American Economic Review97 (5): 1611–38.
2.
AtheySusanImbensGuido W.2022. “Design-Based Analysis in Difference-in-Differences Settings with Staggered Adoption.”Journal of Econometrics226 (1): 62–79.
3.
AzarJoséDuroMiguelKadachIgorOrmazabalGaizka. 2021. “The Big Three and Corporate Carbon Emissions around the World.”Journal of Financial Economics142 (2): 674–96.
4.
BaiChong-EnLuJiangyongTaoZhigang. 2006. “The Multitask Theory of State Enterprise Reform: Empirical Evidence from China.”American Economic Review96 (2): 353–57.
5.
BaiChong-EnLuJiangyongTaoZhigang. 2009. “How Does Privatization Work in China?”Journal of Comparative Economics37 (3): 453–70.
6.
BanerjeeSoumendra NathRoyJayjitYasarMahmut. 2021. “Exporting and Pollution Abatement Expenditure: Evidence from Firm-Level Data.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management105: 102403.
7.
BeladiHamidChaoChi-Chur. 2006. “Does Privatization Improve the Environment?”Economics Letters93 (3): 343–47.
8.
BesleyTimothyGhatakMaitreesh. 2001. “Government versus Private Ownership of Public Goods.”The Quarterly Journal of Economics116 (4): 1343–72.
9.
BluffstoneRandall A.PanayotouTheodore. 2000. “Environmental Liability and Privatization in Central and Eastern Europe: Toward an Optimal Policy.”Environmental and Resource Economics17 (4): 335–52.
10.
BoardmanAnthony E.ViningAidan R.1989. “Ownership and Performance in Competitive Environments: A Comparison of the Performance of Private, Mixed, and State-Owned Enterprises.”The Journal of Law and Economics32 (1): 1–33.
11.
BrandtLorenvan BiesebroeckJohannesWangLuhangZhangYifan. 2017. “WTO Accession and Performance of Chinese Manufacturing Firms.”American Economic Review107 (9): 2784–820.
12.
BrandtLorenvan BiesebroeckJohannesZhangYifan. 2012. “Creative accounting or creative destruction? Firm-level productivity growth in Chinese manufacturing.”Journal of Development Economics97 (2): 339–351.
13.
CaiXiqianLuYiWuMingqinYuLinhui. 2016. “Does Environmental Regulation Drive Away Inbound Foreign Direct Investment? Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China.”Journal of Development Economics123: 73–85.
14.
CallawayBrantlySant’ AnnaPedro H. C.2021. “Difference-in-Differences with Multiple Time Periods.”Journal of Econometrics225 (2): 200–230.
15.
CheJiahua. 2009. “A Dynamic Model of Privatization with Endogenous Post-Privatization Performance.”The Review of Economic Studies76 (2): 563–96.
16.
CoaseRonald H.1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.”The Journal of Law and Economics3: 1–44.
17.
ColeMatthew A.ElliottRobert J. R.2003. “Determining the Trade-Environment Composition Effect: The Role of Capital, Labor and Environmental Regulations.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management46 (3): 363–83.
18.
ColeMatthew A.ElliottRobert J. R.OkuboToshihiroZhouYing. 2013. “The Carbon Dioxide Emissions of Firms: A Spatial Analysis.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management65 (2): 290–309.
19.
ColeMatthew A.ElliottRobert J. R.StroblEric. 2008. “The Environmental Performance of Firms: The Role of Foreign Ownership, Training, and Experience.”Ecological Economics65 (3): 538–46.
20.
CollinsAlanHarrisRichard I. D.2002. “Does Plant Ownership Affect the Level of Pollution Abatement Expenditure?”Land Economics78 (2): 171–89.
21.
de ChaisemartinClémentd’HaultfœuilleXavier. 2020. “Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects.”American Economic Review110 (9): 2964–96.
22.
DuJunLiuXiaoxuan. 2015. “Selection, Staging, and Sequencing in the Recent Chinese Privatization.”The Journal of Law and Economics58 (3): 657–82.
23.
DufloEstherGreenstoneMichaelPandeRohiniRyanNicholas. 2013. “Truth-Telling by Third-Party Auditors and the Response of Polluting Firms: Experimental Evidence from India.”The Quarterly Journal of Economics128 (4): 1499–545.
24.
DufloEstherGreenstoneMichaelPandeRohiniRyanNicholas. 2018. “The Value of Regulatory Discretion: Estimates from Environmental Inspections in India.”Econometrica86 (6): 2123–60.
25.
DyckI. J. Alexander. 1997. “Privatization in Eastern Germany: Management Selection and Economic Transition.”The American Economic Review87 (4): 565–97.
26.
EarnhartDietrich. 2004. “Liability for Past Environmental Contamination and Privatization.”Environmental and Resource Economics29 (1): 97–122.
27.
EskelandGunnar S.HarrisonAnn E.2003. “Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis.”Journal of Development Economics70 (1): 1–23.
28.
FangGuochangGaoZhengyeTianLixinFuMin. 2022. “What Drives Urban Carbon Emission Efficiency? – Spatial Analysis Based on Nighttime Light Data.”Applied Energy312: 118772.
29.
FlammerCaroline. 2021. “Corporate Green Bonds.”Journal of Financial Economics142 (2): 499–516.
30.
FosterAndrewGutierrezEmilioKumarNaresh. 2009. “Voluntary Compliance, Pollution Levels, and Infant Mortality in Mexico.”American Economic Review99 (2): 191–97.
31.
FrankelJeffrey A.RoseAndrew K.2005. “Is Trade Good or Bad for the Environment? Sorting out the Causality.”Review of Economics and Statistics87 (1): 85–91.
32.
FrydmanRomanGrayCherylHesselMarekRapaczynskiAndrzej. 1999. “When Does Privatization Work? The Impact of Private Ownership on Corporate Performance in the Transition Economies.”The Quarterly Journal of Economics114 (4): 1153–91.
33.
Goodman-BaconAndrew. 2021. “Difference-in-Differences with Variation in Treatment Timing.”Journal of Econometrics225 (2): 254–77.
34.
GuoYanGanJieXuChenggang. 2008. “A Nationwide Survey of Privatized Firms in China.”Seoul Journal of Economics21 (2): 311–31.
35.
GuptaNandini. 2005. “Partial Privatization and Firm Performance.”The Journal of Finance60 (2): 987–1015.
36.
HeGuojunWangShaodaZhangBing. 2020. “Watering down Environmental Regulation in China.”The Quarterly Journal of Economics135 (4): 2135–85.
37.
HeZi-LinTongTony W.ZhangYuchenHeWenlong. 2018. “A Database Linking Chinese Patents to China’s Census Firms.”Scientific Data5 (1): 1–16.
38.
HsiehChang-TaiSongZheng Michael. 2015. “Grasp the Large, Let Go of the Small: The Transformation of the State Sector in China.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 295–346. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
39.
HuangZhangkaiLiLixingMaGuangrongXuLixin Colin. 2017. “Hayek, Local Information, and Commanding Heights: Decentralizing State-Owned Enterprises in China.”American Economic Review107 (8): 2455–78.
40.
JeffersonGary H.1998. “China’s State Enterprises: Public Goods, Externalities, and Coase.”The American Economic Review88 (2): 428–32.
41.
LiJinyingLiSisi. 2020. “Energy Investment, Economic Growth and Carbon Emissions in China—Empirical Analysis Based on Spatial Durbin Model.”Energy Policy140: 111425.
42.
LiWeiXuLixin Colin. 2004. “The Impact of Privatization and Competition in the Telecommunications Sector around the World.”The Journal of Law and Economics47 (2): 395–430.
43.
LiaoLiLiuBiboWangHao. 2014. “China’s Secondary Privatization: Perspectives from the Split-Share Structure Reform.”Journal of Financial Economics113 (3): 500–518.
44.
LinJustin YifuCaiFangLiZhou. 1998. “Competition, Policy Burdens, and State-Owned Enterprise Reform.”The American Economic Review88 (2): 422–27.
45.
LipscombMollyMobarakAhmed Mushfiq. 2017. “Decentralization and Pollution Spillovers: Evidence from the Re-drawing of County Borders in Brazil.”The Review of Economic Studies84 (1): 464–502.
46.
LiuQingLuRuosiLuYiLuongTuan Anh. 2021. “Import Competition and Firm Innovation: Evidence from China.”Journal of Development Economics151: 102650.
47.
LiuQingQiuLarry D.2016. “Intermediate Input Imports and Innovations: Evidence from Chinese Firms’ Patent Filings.”Journal of International Economics103: 166–83.
48.
LuYunguoZhangLin. 2023. “Environmental Information Disclosure and Firm Production: Evidence from the Estimated Efficiency of Publicly Listed Firms in China.”Journal of Productivity Analysis59 (1): 99–119.
49.
LundinErik. 2020. “Effects of Privatization on Price and Labor Efficiency: The Swedish Electricity Distribution Sector.”The Energy Journal41 (2): 247–74.
50.
ManagiShunsukeHibikiAkiraTsurumiTetsuya. 2009. “Does Trade Openness Improve Environmental Quality?”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management58 (3): 346–63.
51.
McAuslandCarolMillimetDaniel L.2013. “Do National Borders Matter? Intranational Trade, International Trade, and the Environment.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management65 (3): 411–37.
52.
MegginsonWilliam L.NashRobert C.van RandenborghMatthias. 1994. “The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: An International Empirical Analysis.”The Journal of Finance49 (2): 403–52.
53.
MeyerAndrewPacGrzegorz. 2013. “Environmental Performance of State-Owned and Privatized Eastern European Energy Utilities.”Energy Economics36: 205–14.
54.
PerottiEnrico C.1995. “Credible Privatization.”The American Economic Review85 (4): 847–59.
55.
SahaBibhas. 2012. “Does Privatization Improve the Environment? Revisiting the Monopoly Case.”Economics Letters115 (1): 97–99.
56.
ShapiroJoseph S.WalkerReed. 2018. “Why Is Pollution from US Manufacturing Declining? The Roles of Environmental Regulation, Productivity, and Trade.”American Economic Review108 (12): 3814–54.
57.
ShiveSophie A.ForsterMargaret M.2020. “Corporate Governance and Pollution Externalities of Public and Private Firms.”The Review of Financial Studies33 (3): 1296–330.
58.
SunLiyangAbrahamSarah. 2021. “Estimating Dynamic Treatment Effects in Event Studies with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects.”Journal of Econometrics225 (2): 175–99.
59.
SunQianTongWilson H. S.2003. “China Share Issue Privatization: The Extent of Its Success.”Journal of Financial Economics70 (2): 183–222.
60.
UpwardRichardWangZhengZhengJinghai. 2013. “Weighing China’s Export Basket: The Domestic Content and Technology Intensity of Chinese Exports.”Journal of Comparative Economics41 (2): 527–43.
61.
WangHuaJinYanhong. 2007. “Industrial Ownership and Environmental Performance: Evidence from China.”Environmental and Resource Economics36 (3): 255–73.
62.
WangQiLiuMengdiZhangBing. 2022. “Do State-Owned Enterprises Really Have Better Environmental Performance in China? Environmental Regulation and Corporate Environmental Strategies.”Resources, Conservation and Recycling185: 106500.
63.
XuChenggang. 2011. “The Fundamental Institutions of China’s Reforms and Development.”Journal of Economic Literature49 (4): 1076–151.
64.
ZhouBoDingHao. 2023. “How Public Attention Drives Corporate Environmental Protection: Effects and Channels.”Technological Forecasting and Social Change191: 122486.
65.
ZhouKaileYangJingnaYangTingDingTao. 2023. “Spatial and Temporal Evolution Characteristics and Spillover Effects of China’s Regional Carbon Emissions.”Journal of Environmental Management325: 116423.
66.
ZhuXiaodong. 2012. “Understanding China’s Growth: Past, Present, and Future.”Journal of Economic Perspectives26 (4): 103–124.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
