Principles of comparative research. In: FeinsteinAR, ed. Clinical epidemiology: The architecture of clinical research. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co., 1985: 25–38.
3.
Preliminary appraisal of the outline. In: FeinsteinAR, ed. Clinical epidemiology: The architecture of clinical research. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co., 1985: 249–60.
4.
Introduction: How to review your own performance. In: SackettDLHaynesRBTugwellP, eds. Clinical epidemiology: A basic science for clinical medicine. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co., 1985: 245–71.
5.
GuyattGHBombardierCTugwellPX. Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials. Can Med Assoc J1986; 134:889–95.
6.
RosenfeldRM. Clinical research in otolaryngology journals. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1991; 117:164–8.
7.
GatesGA. Reviewing the literature. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1991; 117:168–70.
8.
Grateful Med. Version 6.0. Bethesda: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health. National Library of Medicine (NML), June 1, 1992.
9.
HaynesRB. Purpose and procedure. ACP Journal Club1991; 114:A10–11.
10.
OxmanADGuyattGH. Guidelines for reading literature reviews. Can Med Assoc J1988; 138:697–703.
11.
OxmanADGuyattGH. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol1991; 44:1271–8.
12.
OxmanAD. Reader's guide for review articles: Why worry about methods?. ACP Journal Club1991; 115 (Suppl):A12.
13.
MulrowCD. The medical review article: State-of-the-science. Ann Intern Med1987; 106:485–8.
14.
SquiresBP. Editorial: Biomedical review articles: What editors want from authors and peer reviewers. Can Med Assoc J1989; 141:195–7.
15.
Scientific decisions in choosing groups. In: FeinsteinAR, ed. Clinical epidemiology: The architecture of clinical research. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co., 1985: 458–98.
16.
OxmanADGuyattGHSingerJ. Agreement among reviewers of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol1991; 44:91–8.
17.
ZenkKESchellKHLafleurCMSchellKH. Need for pediatric data in review articles (letter). Clin Pharmacol1990; 9:164.
18.
HaynesRBMcKibbonKAWalkerCJRyanN. Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings. A study of use and usefulness. Ann Intern Med1990; 112:78–84.
19.
McKibbonKAHaynesRBDilksCJ. How good are clinical MEDLINE searches? A comparative study of clinical end-user and librarian searches. Comput Biomed Res1990; 23:583–93.
20.
BaretaJCLarsonDBLyonsJSZorcJJ. A comparison of manual and MEDLARS reviews of the literature on consultation liaison psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry1990; 147:1040–2.
21.
WoolfSH. Editorial: Review articles and disclosure of methods. Am J Prev Med1991; 7:53–4.
22.
Directory of U. S. government datafiles for mainframes and microcomputers: Directory of U.S. government datafiles prepared by the Federal Computer Products Center, National Technical Information Service, Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. Springfield, Va.: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, 1991.
23.
SyngeRL. 25 years of Science Citation Index — Some experiences. J Chem Inf Comput Sci1990; 30:33–5.
24.
How to use a library. In: SackettDLHaynesRBTugwellP, eds. Clinical epidemiology: A basic science for clinical medicine. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co., 1985: 271–83.
25.
FeinsteinAR. A bibliography of publications on observer variability. J Chron Dis1985; 38:619–32.
26.
ElmoreJGFeinsteinAR. A bibliograph of publications of observer variability (final installment). J Clin Epidemiol1992; 45:567–80.
27.
ShearerBMcCannLCrumpWJ. A primer for users of medical bibliographic databases. J Am Board Fam Pract1989; 2:191–5.
28.
LawsonR. Paperchase: A user-friendly program for searching the biomedical literature. Biotechniques1990; 8:680–3.
29.
A classification of medical research. In: Feinstein AR. Clinical epidemiology: The architecture of clinical research. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co., 1985: 12–24.
30.
FeinsteinAR. Clinical biostatistics XLIV. A survey of the research architecture used for publications in general medical journals. Clin Pharmacol Ther1978; 24:117–25.
31.
YankauerA. Who are the peer reviewers and how much do they review. JAMA1990; 263:1338–40.
32.
GarfunkelJMLawsonEEHamrickHJUlshenMH. Effect of acceptance or rejection on the author's evaluation of peer review of medical manuscripts. JAMA1990; 263:1376–8.
33.
GoreSMJonesGThompsonSG. The Lancet's statistical review process: Areas for improvement by authors. Lancet1992; 340:100–2.
34.
FeinsteinARKramerMS. Clinical biostatistics LIII, The architecture of observer/method variability and other types of process research. Clin Pharmacol Ther1980; 28:551–63.
35.
ChalmersTCFrankCSReitmanD. Minimizing the three stages of publication bias. JAMA1990; 263:1392–5.
36.
PfeiferMPSnodgrassGL. The continued use of retracted, invalid scientific literature. JAMA1990; 263:1420–3.
37.
CookDJGuyattGHLaupacisASackettDL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest1992; 102:305S–311S.
38.
SackettDLHaynesRBTugwellP. Clinical epidemiology: A basic science for clinical medicine. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co., 1985.
39.
FeinsteinAR. Clinical epidemiology: The architecture of clinical research. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co., 1985.
40.
JenicekM. Meta-analysis in medicine: Where we are and where we want to go. J Clin Epidemiol1989; 42:35–44.
41.
FleissJLGrossAJ. Meta-analysis in epidemiology, with special reference to studies of the association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer: A critique. J Clin Epidemiol1991; 44:127–39.
42.
LauJLAntmanEMJimenez-SilvaJKupelnickBAMostellerFChalmersTC. Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med1992; 327:248–54.