The purpose of our study was to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of two selected methods of in vitro allergy testing. Specifically, the PRIST/modified RAST I125 isotope systems and the Quantizyme/modified EAST alkaline phosphatase method were compared∗. The time, expense, convenience, and diagnostic efficacy of the two procedures are discussed. Special attention is given to the practicality of each method for the practicing physician.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. Immunology and Allergy. Vol. 18: 4, Nov. 1985.
2.
. RinkelHJ. Management of clinical allergy. Arch Otolaryngol 76/77, December1962 and January 1963.
3.
. WilloughbyJW. Diagnosis of allergy by serial dilution skin endpoint titration. Cont Ed Fam Phys1979; 11: 3.
4.
. FadalRGNalebuffJJ. RAST in Clinical Allergy1981.
5.
. NalebuffDJFadalRGAliM.An enthusiastic view of the use of RAST in clinical allergy. Immunol Allergy Pract1981; 3: 18–29.
6.
. OrmonroydPRobertshawD.A comparison of the Phadebas and Phadezym IgE paper Immunosorbent Test Kits, Clin Allergy1983;13: 51–5.
7.
. AliMRamanarayananMP. Correlation of a micro-ELISA assay with the skin test and the RAST assay in inhalant allergy. Ann Allergy1984; 53: 143–50.
8.
. AliMNalebuffDJRamanarayananMPFayemiAOMesa-JejadaR.Assay of IgE antibodies against June and timothy grasses by an immunoperoxidase technique. Clin Allergy1980; 10: 203–9.
9.
. AliMNalebuffDJFadalRGFayemiAG. Correlation of the diagnostic skin test with the immunoperoxidase assay in ragweed hypersensitivity. Ann Allergy1980; 45: 63–6.
10.
. SeltzerJMHalpernGMTsayY.Correlation of allergy test results obtained by IgE FAST, RAST, and prick-puncture methods. Ann Allergy1985; 54: 25–30.