Sixteen patients with confirmed mass lesions of the posterior fossa and normal hearing sensitivity for pure tones were studied. Patients’ main symptoms, auditory brain-stem response (ABR), and lesion size were analyzed. All patients manifested neurologic and/or otoneurologic symptoms or complained of hearing difficulty disproportionate to their pure-tone findings. Interestingly, the patients in this select group were younger (mean = 34 years) than the typical patient with a posterior fossa tumor. ABR results were abnormal in 15 of the patients, although several indices—including absolute and interwave latencies, interaural latency difference, and wave presence/absence—were employed to achieve this sensitivity. Lesion size varied considerably and failed to correlate with ABR or pure-tone results.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
. HuertasJHaymakerW: Localization of lesions involving the statoacoustic nerve. HaymakerW, editor: Bing's localization in neurological disease, ed 15. St. Louis, 1969, CV Mosby Co, pp 186–216.
2.
. JohnsonEW: Auditory test results in 500 cases of acoustic neuroma. Arch Otolaryngol103: 152–158, 1977.
3.
. GranickMSMartuzaRLParkerSWOjemannRGMontgomeryWW: Cerebellopontine angle meningioma: Clinical manifestations and diagnosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol94: 34–38, 1985.
4.
. EichelBHedgecockLWilliamsH: A review of the literature on the audiologic aspect of neuro-otologic diagnosis. Laryngoscope76: 1–29, 1966.
. SaundersAZJacksonRT: CPA tumors with normal routine audiometry and positive reflex and BSER tests. Am J Otol2: 318–323, 1981.
8.
. MusiekFSachsEGeurkinkNWeiderD: Auditory brainstem response in eighth nerve lesions: A review and presentation of cases. Ear Hear1: 297–300, 1980.
9.
. MustekFEGolleglyKM: ABR in eighth nerve and low brainstem lesions. JacobsonJT, editor: The auditory brainstem response. San Diego, 1985, College-Hill Press, pp 181–202.
10.
. JergerJJordanC: Normal audiometric findings. Am J Otol1: 157–159, 1980.
11.
. MartinMMooreE: Scalp distribution of early auditory evoked response. Arch Otolaryngol103: 326–328, 1977.
12.
. ParkerD: Dependence of the auditory brainstem response on electrode location. Arch Otolaryngol107: 367–371, 1981.
13.
. ClemisJMcGeeT: Brainstem electric response audiometry and the differential diagnosis of acoustic tumors. Laryngoscope89: 31–42, 1979.
14.
. SchuknechtHF: Pathology of the ear. Cambridge, 1974, Harvard University Press, p 125.
15.
. OlsenWONoffsingerDKurdzielS: Acoustic reflex and decay: Occurrence in patients with cochlear and eighth nerve lesions. Arch Otolaryngol101: 622–625, 1975.
16.
. HirschAAndersonH: Audiologic test results in 96 patients with tumors affecting the eighth nerve: A clinical study with emphasis on the early audiological diagnosis. Acta Otolaryngol (Suppl)369, pp 1–26, 1980.
17.
. MusiekFEMuellerRJKibbeKSRackliffeLM: Audiologic test selection in the detection of eighth nerve disorders. Am J Otol4: 281–287, 1983.
18.
. GruskinPCarberryJN: Pathology of acoustic tumors. HouseWFLeutjeCM, editors: Acoustic tumors, vol 1. Baltimore, 1979, University Park Press, pp 85–148.
19.
. MollerAR: Physiology of the ascending auditory pathway with special reference to the auditory brainstem response (ABR). PinheiroMMusiekF, editors: Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: Foundations and clinical correlates, Baltimore, 1985, Williams & Wilkins, pp 23–41.
20.
. WorthingtonDWPetersJF: Electrophysiologic audiometry. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol212: 23–33, 1980.
