We propose an animal model from which it is possible to follow nerve-muscle unit recovery after a nerve graft easily, consistently, and relatively inexpensively. The model is also compatible with subsequent histologic or histochemical analysis. We document the recovery of a group of animals after nerve grafting to demonstrate the flexibility of the model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
. DuckerTBKempeLGHayesGJ: The metabolic background for peripheral nerve surgery. J Neurosurg30: 270–280, 1969.
2.
. McQuarrieIGGrafsteinB: Axon outgrowth enhanced by a previous nerve injury. Arch Neurol29: 53–55, 1973.
3.
. McQuarrieIGGrafsteinBGershonMD: Axonal regeneration in the rat sciatic nerve: Effect of a conditioning lesion and of dbcAMP. Brain Res132: 443–453, 1977.
. MiraJ-C: Quantitative studies of the regeneration of rat myelinated nerve fibres: Variations in the number and size of regenerating fibres after repeated localized freezings. J Anat129: 77–93, 1979.
6.
. RosenJMJewettDL: Physiological methods of evaluating experimental nerve repairs. JewettDLMcCarrollHRJr, editors: Nerve repair and regeneration: Its clinical and experimental basis. St Louis. 1980. The CV Mosby Co, pp 150–161.
7.
. GordonLBunckeHJewettDLMuldowneyBBunckeG: Predegenerated nerve autografts as compared with fresh nerve autografts in freshly cut and precut motor nerve defects in the rat. J Hand Surg4: 42–47, 1979.
8.
. HolmesWYoungJZ: Nerve regeneration after immediate and delayed suture. J Anat77: 63–96, 1942.
9.
. SunderlandS: The anatomical basis of nerve repair. JewettDLMcCarrollHRJr, editors: Nerve repair and regeneration: Its clinical and experimental basis. St Louis, The CV Mosby Co, 1980, p 19.