DavisH: Guide for the classification and evaluation of hearing handicap in relation to the International Audiometric Zero. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol69: 740–751, 1965.
2.
Guide to the evaluation of permanent impairment; ear, nose, throat, and related structures. Committee on Medical Rating of Physical Impairment. JAMA177: 489–501, 1961.
3.
SilvermanSRHirshIJ: Problems related to the use of speech in clinical audiometry. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol64: 1234–1248, 1955.
4.
FletcherH: Speech and Hearing. New York, D. van Nostrand Inc, 1929.
5.
Tentative standard procedure for evaluating the percentage of useful hearing loss in medicolegal cases. Council on Physical Therapy. JAMA119: 1108–1109, 1942.
6.
Tentative standard procedure for evaluating the percentage loss of hearing in medicolegal cases. Council on Physical Medicine. JAMA133: 396–397, 1947.
7.
Principles for evaluating hearing loss. Council on Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. JAMA157: 1408–1409, 1955. Abstracted, Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol59: 550–552, 1955.
8.
CarhartR: Speech reception in relation to pattern of pure tone loss. J Speech Disord11: 97–108, 1946.
9.
HarrisJDHainesHLMyersCK: A new formula for using the audiogram to predict speech hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol63: 158–176, 1956.
10.
QuiggleRRGlorigADelkJH: Predicting hearing loss for speech from pure tone audiograms. Laryngoscope67: 1–15, 1957.
11.
FrenchNRSteinbergJC: Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds. J Acoust Soc Am19: 90–119, 1947.
12.
HirshIJReynoldsEGJosephM: Intelligibility of different speech materials. J Acoust Soc Am26: 530–538, 1954.
13.
Guide for the evaluation of hearing impairment. Report of the AAOO Committee on Conservation of Hearing (Subcommittee on Noise in Industry). Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol63: 236–238, 1959.
14.
American Standard Specification for Audiometers for General Diagnostic Purposes, Z24.5-1951. New York, American Standards Association, 1951.
15.
American National Standard Specifications for Audiometers, ANSI S3.6-7969. New York, American National Standards Institute Inc, 1970.
16.
KryterKDWilliamsCGreenDM: Auditory acuity and the perception of speech. J Acoust Soc Am34: 1217–1223, 1962.
17.
SuterAH: The Ability of Mildly Hearing-Impaired Individuals to Discriminate Speech in Noise. Joint EPA/USAF study, EPA 550/9-78-100, AMRL-TR-78-4. US Environmental Protection Agency, 1978.
18.
AnianssonG: Methods for assessing high frequency hearing loss in everyday listening situations. Acta Otolaryngol, suppl 320, 1974.
19.
HarrisJD: Combinations of distortion in speech: The twenty-five percent safety factor by multiple-cueing. Arch Otolaryngol72: 227–232, 1960.
20.
HarrisJDHainesJDMyersCK: The importance of hearing at 3 kc for understanding speeded speech. Laryngoscope70: 131–146, 1960.
21.
HarrisJD: Pure-tone acuity and the intelligibility of everyday speech. J Acoust Soc Am37: 824–830, 1965.