Abstract
Objectives
We compared the diagnostic accuracies of narrowband imaging and white-light endoscopy in the detection of nasopharyngeal cancer.
Data Sources
Six databases (PubMed, Cochrane Database, Embase, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar).
Review Methods
The 6 databases were thoroughly reviewed by 2 authors (working independently) from their dates of inception to December 2019. Nasopharyngeal mucosal or vascular changes detected by narrowband imaging were compared to those detected by white-light endoscopy. The authors extracted true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative parameters for each study. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies version 2 tool. The extent of interrater agreement was assessed.
Results
Eighteen prospective or retrospective studies were included. The diagnostic odds ratio of narrowband imaging was 77.560 (95% confidence interval [CI], 37.424-160.739). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.926. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value were 0.871 (95% CI, 0.808-0.915), 0.905 (95% CI, 0.816-0.953), and 0.955 (95% CI, 0.906-0.979), respectively. The correlation between sensitivity and the false-positive rate was 0.284, indicating that heterogeneity was absent. Narrowband imaging exhibited moderate interrater reliability (0.7037; 95% CI, 0.6558-0.746). Subgroup analysis showed that vascular patterns revealed by endoscopy in a screened subgroup were significantly more diagnostically accurate than mucosal patterns used for surveillance of a recurrent cancer subgroup.
Conclusions
Narrowband imaging exhibits high diagnostic accuracy and should be used in the diagnostic workup of nasopharyngeal cancer. However, further studies are necessary to confirm our results.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.