Abstract
Objective
Vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery is feasible for various tumor sizes that are inappropriate for wait and scan or radiosurgery. The predictive value of 2 grading systems was investigated for postoperative hearing preservation (HP) in a large series.
Study Design
Retrospective analysis.
Setting
Neurosurgical patient database of the University of Erlangen was queried between 2014 and 2017.
Methods
Retrospective single-center analysis on 138 VSs operated on via a retrosigmoidal approach. The mean tumor size was 20.4 mm (SD, 7.6 mm) with fundal infiltration in 67.4%. The overall resection rate was 93.5%. Tumors were classified preoperatively by the 3-tier Erlangen grading system depending on size or the anatomically based 4-tier Koos grading system.
Results
Preoperative hearing preservation was found in 70.3% of patients and was significantly correlated to tumor size (P = .001). For Erlangen grading, a mean postoperative serviceable hearing preservation rate of 32% was achieved: 83.3% for tumors <12 mm, 30.3% for tumors between 12 and 25 mm, and 5.3% for tumors >25 mm. In contrast, according to Koos grading, postoperative serviceable hearing preservation was 100% for grade 1 tumors (meatal), 35.6% for grade 2 (cisternal), 23.1% for grade 3 (brainstem contact), and 21.7% for grade 4 (brainstem compression). Of the total cohort, 86% had normal or nearly normal postoperative facial function (House-Brackmann grades 1 and 2).
Conclusion
Surgery on small VSs can achieve excellent hearing preservation. Different grading has a significant influence on and correlates with postoperative hearing preservation. Tumor size seems more important than anatomic relationship.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.