To determine the role of skeletal muscle index (SMI) in the assessment of frailty and determination of discharge to post–acute care facilities (PACF) after head and neck cancer free flap reconstruction (HNCFFR).
Adult patients undergoing HNCFFR from 2014 to 2019 with preoperative abdominal computed tomography imaging were retrospectively analyzed. Patient demographics, 5-factor modified frailty index (5-mFI), body mass index (BMI), SMI at the third lumbar vertebra, oncologic history, perioperative data, and Clavien-Dindo (CD) complications were collected. Binary logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of discharge disposition.
Results
The cohort consisted of 206 patients, 62 (30.1%) of whom were discharged to PACF. Patients discharged to PACF were of older age (65.4 vs 57.1 years, P < .0001) and had a lower SMI (38.8 vs 46.8 cm2/m2, P < .0001), higher 5-mFI (≥3; 25.8% vs 4.2%, P < .0001), and greater incidence of stage IV (80.6% vs 64.1%, P = .0211) aerodigestive cancer (80.6% vs 66.7%, P = .0462). Patients discharged to PACF experienced more blood transfusions (74.2% vs 35.4%, P < .0001), major postoperative complications (CD ≥3, 40.3% vs 12.9%, P < .0001), and delirium (33.9% vs 4.2%, P < .0001). After adjusting for pre- and postoperative factors, multivariate binary logistic regression identified age (P = .0255), 5-mFI (P < .0042), SMI (P = .0199), stage IV cancer (P = .0250), aerodigestive tumor (P = .0366), delirium (P < .0001), and perioperative blood transfusion (P = .0144) as independent predictors of discharge to PACF.
Conclusions
SMI and 5-mFI are independently associated with discharge to PACF after HNCFFR and should be considered in preoperative planning and assessment of frailty.
RajVSPughTM.Inpatient care for the cancer survivor: opportunities to develop and deliver standards for care. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;97(8):595-601.
2.
BurkeREJuarez-ColungaELevyCProchazkaAVColemanEAGindeAA.Rise of post-acute care facilities as a discharge destination of US hospitalizations. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(2):295-296.
3.
MechanicR.Post-acute care—the next frontier for controlling Medicare spending. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(8):692-694.
CramerJDPatelUASamantSShintani SmithS.Discharge destination after head and neck surgery: predictors of discharge to postacute care. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;155(6):997-1004.
6.
ParharHSChangBADurhamJSAndersonDWHaydenREPrismanE.Post-acute care use after major head and neck oncologic surgery with microvascular reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2018;128(11):2532-2538.
7.
HatcherJLBellEBBrowneJDWaltonenJD.Disposition of elderly patients after head and neck reconstruction. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(11):1236-1241.
8.
BaldomanDVandenbrinkR.Physical therapy challenges in head and neck cancer. In: MaghamiEHoAS, eds. Multidisciplinary Care of the Head and Neck Cancer Patient. Springer International; 2018:209-223.
9.
ParkPHashmiM.Occupational therapy for the head and neck cancer patient. In: MaghamiEHoAS, eds. Multidisciplinary Care of the Head and Neck Cancer Patient. Springer International Publishing; 2018:225-235.
10.
HansenKChenowethMThompsonHStroussA.Role of the speech-language pathologist (SLP) in the head and neck cancer team. In: MaghamiEHoAS, eds. Multidisciplinary Care of the Head and Neck Cancer Patient. Springer International Publishing; 2018:31-42.
11.
PittsKDArteagaAAStevensBP, et al. Frailty as a predictor of postoperative outcomes among patients with head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;160(4):664-671.
12.
NiemanCLPitmanKTTufaroAPEiseleDWFrickKDGourinCG.The effect of frailty on short-term outcomes after head and neck cancer surgery. Laryngoscope. 2018;128(1):102-110.
13.
WalstonJHadleyECFerrucciL, et al. Research agenda for frailty in older adults: toward a better understanding of physiology and etiology: summary from the American Geriatrics Society/National Institute on Aging Research Conference on Frailty in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(6):991-1001.
14.
MorleyJEVellasBAbellan van KanG, et al. Frailty consensus: a call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(6):392-397.
15.
PottelLBoterbergTPottelH, et al. Determination of an adequate screening tool for identification of vulnerable elderly head and neck cancer patients treated with radio(chemo)therapy. J Geriatr Oncol. 2012;3(1):24-32.
16.
PottelLLyckeMBoterbergT, et al. G-8 indicates overall and quality-adjusted survival in older head and neck cancer patients treated with curative radiochemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2015;15(1):875.
17.
BrasLPetersTTAWedmanJ, et al. Predictive value of the Groningen Frailty Indicator for treatment outcomes in elderly patients after head and neck, or skin cancer surgery in a retrospective cohort. Clin Otolaryngol. 2015;40(5):474-482.
18.
KwonMKimSARohJL, et al. An introduction to a head and neck cancer-specific frailty index and its clinical implications in elderly patients: a prospective observational study focusing on respiratory and swallowing functions. Oncologist. 2016;21(9):1091-1098.
19.
AbtNBXieYPuramSVRichmonJDVarvaresMA.Frailty index: intensive care unit complications in head and neck oncologic regional and free flap reconstruction. Head Neck. 2017;39(8):1578-1585.
20.
AbtNBRichmonJDKochWMEiseleDWAgrawalN.Assessment of the predictive value of the modified frailty index for Clavien-Dindo grade IV critical care complications in major head and neck cancer operations. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;142(7):658-664.
21.
PanayiACOrkabyARSakthivelD, et al. Impact of frailty on outcomes in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2019;218(2):393-400.
22.
SubramaniamSAalbergJJSorianoRPDivinoCM.New 5-factor modified frailty index using American College of Surgeons NSQIP data. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;226(2):173-181.e8.
23.
The Johns Hopkins ACG System: Version 11.0 Technical Reference Guide. The Johns Hopkins University; 2015.
24.
RockwoodKStadnykKMacKnightCMcDowellIHébertRHoganDB.A brief clinical instrument to classify frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 1999;353(9148):205-206.
25.
JonesDMSongXRockwoodK.Operationalizing a frailty index from a standardized comprehensive geriatric assessment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(11):1929-1933.
26.
FriedLPTangenCMWalstonJ, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol Med Sci. 2001;56A(3):M146-M156.
27.
ZwartATvan der HoornAvan OoijenPMASteenbakkersRJHMde BockGHHalmosGB.CT-measured skeletal muscle mass used to assess frailty in patients with head and neck cancer. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019;10(5):1060-1069.
28.
Cruz-JentoftAJBahatGGBauerJJ, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):16-31.
29.
YoshimuraYWakabayashiHBiseT, et al. Sarcopenia is associated with worse recovery of physical function and dysphagia and a lower rate of home discharge in Japanese hospitalized adults undergoing convalescent rehabilitation. Nutrition. 2019;61:111-118.
30.
LandiFCalvaniROrtolaniE, et al. The association between sarcopenia and functional outcomes among older patients with hip fracture undergoing in-hospital rehabilitation. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(5):1569-1576.
31.
SimonsenCHeerPDe, BjerreED, et al. Sarcopenia and postoperative complication risk in gastrointestinal surgical oncology: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2018;268(1):58-69.
32.
SilvadePaulaNde Aguiar BrunoKAzevedo AredesMGabrielaVC.Sarcopenia and skeletal muscle quality as predictors of postoperative complication and early mortality in gynecologic cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018;28(2):412-420.
33.
KamarajahSKBundredJTanBHL. Body composition assessment and sarcopenia in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastric Cancer. 2019;22(1):10-22.
34.
AlwaniMMJonesAJNovingerLJ, et al. Impact of sarcopenia on outcomes of autologous head and neck free tissue reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020;36(5):369-378.
35.
BrilSIPezierTFTijinkBMJanssenLMBrauniusWWde BreeR.Preoperative low skeletal muscle mass as a risk factor for pharyngocutaneous fistula and decreased overall survival in patients undergoing total laryngectomy. Head Neck. 2019;41(6):1745-1755.
36.
BozkurtGElhassanHASoydanA, et al. Neck muscle mass index as a predictor of post-laryngectomy wound complications. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2018;127(11):841-847.
37.
MintzirasIMiligkosMWachterSManoharanJMaurerEBartschDK.Sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity are significantly associated with poorer overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2018;59:19-26.
38.
YangMShenYTanLLiW.Prognostic value of sarcopenia in lung cancer: a systematic review. Chest. 2019;156(1):101-111.
39.
ShacharSSWilliamsGRMussHBNishijimaTF.Prognostic value of sarcopenia in adults with solid tumours: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2016;57:58-67.
40.
ChargiNBrilSIEmmelot-VonkMHde BreeR.Sarcopenia is a prognostic factor for overall survival in elderly patients with head-and-neck cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;276(5):1475-1486.
41.
JonesKGordon-WeeksAColemanCSilvaM.Radiologically determined sarcopenia predicts morbidity and mortality following abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2017;41(9):2266-2279.
42.
TamakiAManzoorNFBabajanianEAschaMRezaeeRZenderCA.Clinical significance of sarcopenia among patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;160(3):480-487.
43.
AlbersheimJSathianathenNJZabellJ, et al. Skeletal muscle and fat mass indexes predict discharge disposition after radical cystectomy. J Urol. 2019;202(6):1143-1149.
44.
BokshanSLHanALDe PasseJM, et al. Effect of sarcopenia on postoperative morbidity and mortality after thoracolumbar spine surgery. Orthopedics. 2016;39(6):e1159-e1164.
45.
FrancomacaroLMWalkerCJaapK, et al. Sarcopenia predicts poor outcomes in urgent exploratory laparotomy. Am J Surg. 2018;216(6):1107-1113.
46.
LauermanMHRaithelMKuferaJ, et al. Comparison of individual and composite radiographic markers of frailty in trauma. Injury. 2019;50(1):149-155.
47.
FairchildBWebbTPXiangQTarimaSBraselKJ.Sarcopenia and frailty in elderly trauma patients. World J Surg. 2015;39(2):373-379.
48.
OkenMMCreechRHTormeyDC, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5(6):649-655.
49.
AminMBEdgeSBGreeneFL, et al, eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed.Springer; 2017.
50.
DindoDDemartinesNClavienPA.Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205-213.
51.
ASA House of Delegates. American Society of Anesthesiologists classification. In: ASA Relative Value Guide. American Society of Anesthesiologists; 2014.
52.
TravenSAMcGurkKMReevesRAWaltonZJWoolfSKSloneHS.Modified frailty index predicts medical complications, length of stay, readmission, and mortality following total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2019;28(10):1854-1860.
53.
VelanovichVAntoineHSwartzAPetersDRubinfeldI.Accumulating deficits model of frailty and postoperative mortality and morbidity: its application to a national database. J Surg Res. 2013;183(1):104-110.
54.
SieberCC.Malnutrition and sarcopenia. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019;31(6):793-798.
55.
MitchellCAGoldmanRACurryJM, et al. Morbidity and survival in elderly patients undergoing free flap reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;157(1):42-47.
56.
RockwoodKSongXMacKnightC, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. Can Med Assoc J. 2005;173(5):489-495.
57.
ÜstünGGAksuAEUzunHBitikO.The systematic review and meta-analysis of free flap safety in the elderly patients. Microsurgery. 2017;37(5):442-450.
58.
ParsemainAPhilouzePPradatPCerusePFuchsmannC.Free flap head and neck reconstruction: feasibility in older patients. J Geriatr Oncol. 2019;10(4):577-583.
59.
GohCSLKokYOYongCPC, et al. Outcome predictors in elderly head and neck free flap reconstruction: a retrospective study and systematic review of the current evidence. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018;71(5):719-728.
60.
NaoEEMDassonvilleOChamoreyE, et al. Head and neck free-flap reconstruction in the elderly. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2011;128(2):47-51.
61.
EskanderAKangSYTweelB, et al. Quality indicators: measurement and predictors in head and neck cancer free flap patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;158(2):265-272.
62.
FaginAPGeleskoSWaxMKPetrisorD.Morbidity and functional outcomes with head and neck free flap reconstruction in patients aged 90 years or older. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75(7):1549-1554.
63.
JubbalKTZavlinDSulimanA.The effect of age on microsurgical free flap outcomes: an analysis of 5,951 cases. Microsurgery. 2017;37(8):858-864.
64.
FuTSSklarMCohenM, et al. Is frailty associated with worse outcomes after head and neck surgery? A narrative review. Laryngoscope. 2019;130(6):1436-1442.
65.
DenskyJEskanderAKangS, et al. Risk factors associated with postoperative delirium in patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;145(3):216-221.
66.
AchimVBashJMoweryA, et al. Prognostic indication of sarcopenia for wound complication after total laryngectomy. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;143(12):1159-1165.
67.
SegalDNWilsonJMStaleyCMichaelKW.The 5-item modified frailty index is predictive of 30-day postoperative complications in patients undergoing kyphoplasty vertebral augmentation. World Neurosurg. 2018;116:e225-e231.
68.
ChargiNBrilSISwartzJEWegnerIWillemsSMde BreeR.Skeletal muscle mass is an imaging biomarker for decreased survival in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2020;101:104519.
69.
SwartzJEPothenAJWegnerI, et al. Feasibility of using head and neck CT imaging to assess skeletal muscle mass in head and neck cancer patients. Oral Oncol. 2016;62:28-33.
