To identify clinical predictors of facial nerve (FN) outcomes after microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannoma (VS).
Study Design
Prospective cohort study.
Setting
Academic medical center.
Methods
Consecutive patients undergoing VS resection from November 2017 to October 2019 were included. FN function was evaluated with the House-Brackmann (HB) scale and stratified into good (HB I-II) and poor (HB III-VI) function. Analyses included descriptive statistics, correlation, and logistic regression.
Results
Of 256 patients who met criteria (mean age, 47.7 years; 62.5% female), 227 (88.7%) achieved good FN function postoperatively and 238 (93.0%) at latest follow-up (mean, 154.8 days). Operative approaches consisted of translabyrinthine (50.8%), retrosigmoid (25.0%), and middle fossa craniotomies (24.2%). Extent of resection was decided intraoperatively, and gross or near total resection was accomplished in 237 (92.6%) cases. Postoperative HB grade correlated with latest HB grade (0.615, P < .001). Factors associated with good postoperative FN function included small tumor size (≤15 mm; odds ratio [OR], 2.425; P = .042), gross or near total resection (OR, 3.170; P = .041), and ≥100-µV intraoperative FN electromyographic response to a 0.05-mA stimulus (OR, 22.242; P < .001). Factors associated with good FN function at latest follow-up included gross total resection (OR, 7.764; P = .003) and ≥100-µV FN electromyographic response (OR, 8.518; P < .001), accounting for surgical approach and tumor size.
Conclusion
Microsurgical resection of VS can be accomplished with excellent FN outcomes. Gross total resection and ≥100-µV intraoperative FN electromyographic response predicted excellent FN outcomes. Immediate postoperative FN function is a prognosticator of long-term FN function.
SanosiAFaganPBiggsN. Conservative management of acoustic neuroma. Skull Base. 2006;16(2):95-100. doi:10.1055/s-2006-934112
2.
MacKeithSKerrRMilfordC. Trends in acoustic neuroma management: a 20-year review of the Oxford Skull Base Clinic. J Neurol Surg Part B Skull Base. 2013;74(4):194-200. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1342919
3.
LinEPCraneBT. The management and imaging of vestibular schwannomas. Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38(11):2034-2043. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5213
4.
RamsdenRT. The bloody angle: 100 years of acoustic neuroma surgery. J R Soc Med. 1995;88(8):464P-468P.
5.
KeminkJLLangmanAWNiparkoJKGrahamMD. Operative management of acoustic neuromas: the priority of neurologic function over complete resection. Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 1991;104(1):96-99. doi:10.1177/019459989110400117
6.
SughrueMEKaurRRutkowskiMJ, et al. Extent of resection and the long-term durability of vestibular schwannoma surgery. J Neurosurg. 2011;114(5):1218-1223. doi:10.3171/2010.11.JNS10257
7.
JeltemaHRBakkerNABijlHPWagemakersMMetzemaekersJDMvan DijkJMC. Near total extirpation of vestibular schwannoma with salvage radiosurgery: near total removal of VS with salvage SRS. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(7):1703-1707. doi:10.1002/lary.25115
8.
SchwartzMSKariEStricklandBM, et al. Evaluation of the increased use of partial resection of large vestibular schwanommas: facial nerve outcomes and recurrence/regrowth rates. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34(8):1456-1464. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182976552
9.
ChenZPrasadSCDi LellaF, et al. The behavior of residual tumors and facial nerve outcomes after incomplete excision of vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg. 2014;120(6):1278-1287. doi:10.3171/2014.2.JNS131497
10.
CoulsonSEO’DwyerNJAdamsRDCroxsonGR. Expression of emotion and quality of life after facial nerve paralysis. Otol Neurotol. 2004;25(6):1014-1019. doi:10.1097/00129492-200411000-00026
11.
LeongSCLesserTH. A national survey of facial paralysis on the quality of life of patients with acoustic neuroma. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36(3):503-509. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000428
12.
LiMKKNilesNGoreSEbrahimiAMcGuinnessJClarkJR. Social perception of morbidity in facial nerve paralysis: social perception of morbidity. Head Neck. 2016;38(8):1158-1163. doi:10.1002/hed.24299
13.
NellisJCIshiiMByrnePJBoaheneKDODeyJKIshiiLE. Association among facial paralysis, depression, and quality of life in facial plastic surgery patients. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017;19(3):190. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1462
14.
TosMStangerupS-ECayé-ThomasenPTosTThomsenJ. What is the real incidence of vestibular schwannoma?Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2004;130(2):216. doi:10.1001/archotol.130.2.216
15.
StangerupS-ETosMThomsenJCaye-ThomasenP. True incidence of vestibular schwannoma?Neurosurgery. 2010;67(5):1335-1340. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181f22660
16.
SughrueMEYangIRutkowskiMJArandaDParsaAT. Preservation of facial nerve function after resection of vestibular schwannoma. Br J Neurosurg. 2010;24(6):666-671. doi:10.3109/02688697.2010.520761
17.
GrahnkeKGarstJMartinBLeonettiJAndersonD. Prognostic indices for predicting facial nerve outcome following the resection of large acoustic neuromas. J Neurol Surg Part B Skull Base. 2017;78(6):454-460. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1604077
18.
GreyPLMoffatDAPalmerCRHardyDGBaguleyDM. Factors which influence the facial nerve outcome in vestibular schwannoma surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1996;21(5):409-413. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2273.1996.00816.x
19.
FalcioniMFoisPTaibahASannaM. Facial nerve function after vestibular schwannoma surgery. J Neurosurg. 2011;115(4):820-826. doi:10.3171/2011.5.JNS101597
20.
MoffatDAParkerRAHardyDGMacfarlaneR. Factors affecting final facial nerve outcome following vestibular schwannoma surgery. J Laryngol Otol. 2014;128(5):406-415. doi:10.1017/S0022215114000541
21.
TorresRNguyenYVanierA, et al. Multivariate analysis of factors influencing facial nerve outcome following microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannoma. Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2017;156(3):525-533. doi:10.1177/0194599816677711
22.
CollettiVFiorinoF. Is the middle fossa approach the treatment of choice for intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma?Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2005;132(3):459-466. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2004.09.027
23.
AnsariSFTerryCCohen-GadolAA. Surgery for vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review of complications by approach. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33(3):E14. doi:10.3171/2012.6.FOCUS12163
24.
FuVXVerheulJBBeuteGN, et al. Retreatment of vestibular schwannoma with Gamma Knife radiosurgery: clinical outcome, tumor control, and review of literature. J Neurosurg. 2018;129(1):137-145. doi:10.3171/2017.3.JNS162033
25.
RomiyoPNgEDejamD, et al. Radiosurgery treatment is associated with improved facial nerve preservation versus repeat resection in recurrent vestibular schwannomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019;161(7):1449-1456. doi:10.1007/s00701-019-03940-2
26.
Esquia-MedinaGNGrayeliABFerraryE, et al. Do facial nerve displacement pattern and tumor adhesion influence the facial nerve outcome in vestibular schwannoma surgery?Otol Neurotol. 2009;30(3):392-397. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181967874
27.
RahejaABowersCAMacDonaldJD, et al. Middle fossa approach for vestibular schwannoma: good hearing and facial nerve outcomes with low morbidity. World Neurosurg. 2016;92:37-46. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2016.04.085
28.
NeffBATingJDickinsonSLWellingDB. Facial nerve monitoring parameters as a predictor of postoperative facial nerve outcomes after vestibular schwannoma resection. Otol Neurotol. 2005;26(4):728-732. doi:10.1097/01.mao.0000178137.81729.35
29.
BhimraoSKLeTNDongCC, et al. Role of facial nerve motor-evoked potential ratio in predicting facial nerve function in vestibular schwannoma surgery both immediate and at 1 year. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37(8):1162-1167. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001137
30.
TawfikKOWaltersZAKohlbergGD, et al. Impact of motor-evoked potential monitoring on facial nerve outcomes after vestibular schwannoma resection. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019;128(1):56-61. doi:10.1177/0003489418803969
BlochOSughrueMEKaurR, et al. Factors associated with preservation of facial nerve function after surgical resection of vestibular schwannoma. J Neurooncol. 2011;102(2):281-286. doi:10.1007/s11060-010-0315-5
33.
IkedaMNakazatoHHiroshigeKAbikoYSugiuraM. To what extent do evaluations of facial paralysis by physicians coincide with self-evaluations by patients: comparison of the Yanagihara method, the House-Brackmann method, and self-evaluation by patients. Otol Neurotol. 2003;24(2):334-338. doi:10.1097/00129492-200303000-00033
34.
CullenRDHouseJWBrackmannDELuxfordWMFisherLM. Evaluation of facial function with a questionnaire: reliability and validity. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28(5):719-722. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e31809ed94f
35.
LazariniPMitreETakatuETideiR. Graphic-visual adaptation of House-Brackmann facial nerve grading for peripheral facial palsy. Clin Otolaryngol. 2006;31(3):192-197. doi:10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01197.x
36.
AndersonDELeonettiJWindJJCribariDFaheyK. Resection of large vestibular schwannomas: facial nerve preservation in the context of surgical approach and patient-assessed outcome. J Neurosurg. 2005;102(4):643-649. doi:10.3171/jns.2005.102.4.0643
37.
CarlsonMLTveitenOVDriscollCL, et al. Long-term quality of life in patients with vestibular schwannoma: an international multicenter cross-sectional study comparing microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, observation, and nontumor controls. J Neurosurg. 2015;122(4):833-842. doi:10.3171/2014.11.JNS14594
38.
OwusuJAStewartCMBoaheneK. Facial nerve paralysis. Med Clin North Am. 2018;102(6):1135-1143. doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2018.06.011
39.
van VeenMMTavares-BritoJvan VeenBM, et al. Association of regional facial dysfunction with facial palsy–related quality of life. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019;21(1):32. doi:10.1001/jamafacial.2018.0804
40.
LalwaniAKButtFY-SJacklerRKPittsLHYinglingCD. Facial nerve outcome after acoustic neuroma surgery: a study from the era of cranial nerve monitoring. Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 1994;111(5):561-570. doi:10.1177/019459989411100505
41.
GerganovVMKlingePMNouriMStieglitzLSamiiMSamiiA. Prognostic clinical and radiological parameters for immediate facial nerve function following vestibular schwannoma surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2009;151(6):581-587. doi:10.1007/s00701-009-0288-3
42.
SamiiMGerganovVMSamiiA. Functional outcome after complete surgical removal of giant vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg. 2010;112(4):860-867. doi:10.3171/2009.7.JNS0989
43.
SharmaMSonigAAmbekarSNandaA. Radiological and clinical factors predicting the facial nerve outcome following retrosigmoid approach for large vestibular schwannomas (VSs). J Neurol Surg Part B Skull Base. 2013;74(5):317-323. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1349060
44.
AhnJRyuN-GLimJKangMSeolHJChoY-S. Prognostic factors of facial nerve function after vestibular schwannoma removal via translabyrinthine approach. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 2019;139(6):541-546. doi:10.1080/00016489.2019.1592223
WongRCopelandWJacobJ, et al. Anterior extension of tumor is as important as tumor size to facial nerve outcome and extent of resection for vestibular schwannomas. J Neurol Surg Part B Skull Base. 2017;78(6):473-480. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1604331
47.
GurgelRKDogruSAmdurRLMonfaredA. Facial nerve outcomes after surgery for large vestibular schwannomas: do surgical approach and extent of resection matter?Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33(3):E16. doi:10.3171/2012.7.FOCUS12199
48.
TahaIHyvärinenARantaA, et al. Facial nerve function and hearing after microsurgical removal of sporadic vestibular schwannomas in a population-based cohort. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020;162(1):43-54. doi:10.1007/s00701-019-04055-4
49.
SeolHJKimCParkC-K, et al. Optimal extent of resection in vestibular schwannoma surgery: relationship to recurrence and facial nerve preservation. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2006;46(4):176-181. doi:10.2176/nmc.46.176
50.
WilsonLLinELalwaniA. Cost-effectiveness of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring in middle ear or mastoid surgery. Laryngoscope. 2010;113(10):1736-1745. doi:10.1097/00005537-200310000-00015
51.
PrellJRachingerJSchellerCAlfieriAStraussCRamppS. A real-time monitoring system for the facial nerve. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(6):1064-1073. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000369605.79765.3E
52.
CarlsonMLVan AbelKMSchmittWRDriscollCLNeffBALinkMJ. The anatomically intact but electrically unresponsive facial nerve in vestibular schwannoma surgery. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(6):1125-1130. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318271bce3
53.
MarinPPouliotDFradetG. Facial nerve outcome with a peroperative stimulation threshold under 0.05 mA. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(11):2295-2298. doi:10.1002/lary.22359
54.
SughrueMEKaurRKaneAJ, et al. The value of intraoperative facial nerve electromyography in predicting facial nerve function after vestibular schwannoma surgery. J Clin Neurosci. 2010;17(7):849-852. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2010.02.003
55.
DohertyJKFriedmanRA. Controversies in building a management algorithm for vestibular schwannomas. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;14(5):305-313. doi:10.1097/01.moo.0000244186.72645.d4
56.
SampathPHollidayMJBremHNiparkoJKLongDM. Facial nerve injury in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma) surgery: etiology and prevention. J Neurosurg. 1997;87(1):60-66. doi:10.3171/jns.1997.87.1.0060
57.
HatchJLBauschardMJNguyenSALambertPRMeyerTAMcRackanTR. National trends in vestibular schwannoma surgery: influence of patient characteristics on outcomes. Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2018;159(1):102-109. doi:10.1177/0194599818765717
58.
LipschitzNKohlbergGDWaltersZA, et al. Obesity is not associated with postoperative complications after vestibular schwannoma surgery in a large single institution series. Otol Neurotol. 2019;40(10):1373-1377. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000002397
59.
O’ConnellBPRizkHGStevensSMNguyenSAMeyerTA. The relation between obesity and hospital length of stay after elective lateral skull base surgery: an analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2015;77(5):294-301. doi:10.1159/000435786
60.
CopelandWRMalloryGWNeffBADriscollCLWLinkMJ. Are there modifiable risk factors to prevent a cerebrospinal fluid leak following vestibular schwannoma surgery?J Neurosurg. 2015;122(2):312-316. doi:10.3171/2014.10.JNS14432
61.
LangLHParekhKTsuiBYKMazeM. Perioperative management of the obese surgical patient. Br Med Bull. 2017;124(1):135-155. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldx041
62.
GadkareeSKWeitzmanREYuPKMillerALRenYCorralesCE. The role of body mass index on hearing outcomes after stapes surgery. Otol Neurotol. 2020;41(1):21-24. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000002442
63.
TveitenØVCarlsonMLGoplenF, et al. Patient- versus physician-reported facial disability in vestibular schwannoma: an international cross-sectional study. J Neurosurg. 2017;127(5):1015-1024. doi:10.3171/2016.8.JNS16707
64.
RyzenmanJMPensakMLTewJM. Patient perception of comorbid conditions after acoustic neuroma management: survey results from the Acoustic Neuroma Association. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(5):814-820. doi:10.1097/00005537-200405000-00005
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
