Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the efficacy of aural foreign body (FB) extractions among medical care settings and determine if certain methods of extraction resulted in higher failure rates and procedural complications.

Study Design

Case series with chart review.

Setting

Emergency departments (EDs), urgent cares (UCs), pediatric primary care providers (PCPs), and otolaryngologists (ENTs).

Methods

A total of 366 pediatric patients with EAC foreign bodies at a tertiary children’s hospital and associated satellite clinics.

Results

The ED/UCs (17.46%), PCPs (75.22%), and ENTs (94.54%) exhibited highly variable success rates for pediatric aural FB extractions. Complications were considerably higher for attempts by ED/UCs (22.22%) as compared with PCPs (2.61%) and those of unclear etiology (2.73% of all attempts). Use of balloon-tipped catheters and adhesive-tipped probes (eg, cyanoacrylate/superglue) for FB extraction exhibited 0% success rates with high severity of complications.

Conclusion

Our statistics provide an example in which ED/UCs had higher failure rates at pediatric aural FB removals when compared with PCPs and ENTs. If a single provider (PCP or ED/UC) fails to retrieve an aural FB or if the provider is not comfortable conducting the procedure, then referral to an ENT is preferable to another PCP or ED/UC. Our evidence reveals that balloon-tipped catheters and adhesive-tipped probes for FB removal in the pediatric population are prone to failure and higher rates/severity of complications.

Keywords

foreign body aural emergency urgent care adhesive cyanoacrylate superglue balloon-tipped catheter extraction retrieval

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker

. Foreign bodies of the ears and nose in childhood. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1987;3(2):67-70. doi:10.1097/00006565-198706000-00001

Benger

Davies

. A useful form of glue ear. J Accid Emerg Med. 2000;17:149-150. doi:10.1136/emj.17.2.149

Rosen

Barkin

. Emergency Medicine: Concepts and Clinical Practice. 4th ed. Mosby; 1998.

Balbani

APS

Sanchez

Butugan

, et al. Ear and nose foreign body removal in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1998;46:37-42. doi:10.1016/s0165-5876(98)00118-9

Ryan

Ghosh

Wilson-Boyd

Smit

O’Leary

. Presentation and management of aural foreign bodies in two Australian emergency departments. Emerg Med Australas. 2006;18(4):372-378. doi:10.1111/j.1742-6723.2006.00865.x

Soto

Murphy

Heaton

. Critical procedures in pediatric emergency medicine. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2013;31:335-376. doi:10.1016/j.emc.2012.09.003

Dimuzio

Deschler

. Emergency department management of foreign bodies of the external auditory canal in children. Otol Neurotol. 2002;(27):473-475. doi:10.1097/00129492-200207000-00014

Gupta

Nyakunu

Kippax

. Is the emergency department management of ENT foreign bodies successful? A tertiary care hospital experience in Australia. Ear Nose Throat J. 2016;95(3):113-116.

Mackle

Conlon

. Foreign bodies of the nose and ears in children: should these be managed in the accident and emergency setting? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;70:425-428. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.07.007

10.

Marin

Trainor

. Foreign body removal from the external auditory canal in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006;22(9):630-634. doi:10.1097/01.pec.0000227866.46439.3f

11.

Mingo

Eleff

Anne

Osborne

. Pediatric ear foreign body retrieval: a comparison across specialties. Am J Otolaryngol. 2019;41(2):102-167. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.01.010

12.

Brown

Denmark

Wittlake

Vargas

Watson

Crabb

. Procedural sedation use in the ED: management of pediatric ear and nose foreign bodies. Am J Emerg Med. 2004;22(4):310-314. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2004.04.013

13.

Karimnejad

Nelson

Rohde

Costa

. External auditory canal foreign body extraction outcomes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2017;126(11):755-761. doi:10.1177/0003489417731578

14.

Schulze

Kerschner

Beste

. Pediatric external auditory canal foreign bodies: a review of 698 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;127(1):73-78. doi:10.1067/mhn.2002.126724

15.

Davies

Benger

. Foreign bodies in the nose and ear: a review of techniques for removal in the emergency department. J Accid Emerg Med. 2000;17(2):91-94. doi:10.1136/emj.17.2.91.

16.

Thompson

Wein

Dutcher

. External auditory canal foreign body removal: management practices and outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2003;113:1912-1915. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200311000-00010

17.

Zeinulabdeen

. New touch and pull method to remove foreign bodies from the ear. J Indian Med Assoc. 1977;68:97-98.

18.

Pride

Schwab

. A new technique for removing foreign bodies of the external auditory canal. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1989;5(2):135-136. doi:10.1097/00006565-198906000-00017

19.

Hanson

Stephens

. Cyanoacrylate-assisted foreign body removal from the ear and nose in children. J Paediatr Child Health. 1994;30:77-78. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1754.1994.tb00573.x