Discrete Perineural Invasion Focus Number in Quantification for T1-T2 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Abstract

Objective

Perineural invasion (PNI) has been an established poor prognostic feature for T1-T2 oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Different presentations and amounts of PNI are commonly observed, but PNI is currently recorded as being present or absent. This study asked whether the quantification of PNI provides additional information for early OSCC.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Tertiary referral medical center.

Subjects and Methods

Pathologic reevaluations were performed for 314 patients with T1-T2 OSCC who underwent curative surgery from June 2001 to August 2009. A novel parameter, PNI focus number, was defined for PNI quantification. With 5 PNI foci as the cutoff, patients were categorized into 3 groups: no PNI (0 PNI foci), low PNI (PNI foci, 1-5), and high PNI (PNI foci >5). Rate of cervical lymph node metastasis (LN+), 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS), and 5-year overall survival (OS) were analyzed among these groups.

Results

PNI focus number independently predicted for LN+, poor DSS, and poor OS in multivariate analysis after controlling for T classification, lymphovascular invasion, differentiation, margin, and tumor thickness. The 5-year DSS demonstrated a dose-dependent decrease among the 3 groups (no PNI, 88.6%; low PNI, 75.2%; high PNI, 33.8%; P < .001). Moreover, the 5-year DSS of the high PNI group was significantly worse than that of the low PNI group.

Conclusion

PNI focus number can be a novel parameter for PNI quantification in early OSCC. Although optimal quantification methods still require further investigation, this study offers clear clinical support for the nerve-tumor interaction hypothesis and advocates further mechanistic research for the exploration of PNI-related treatment concepts for OSCC.

Keywords

oral squamous cell carcinoma perineural invasion quantification perineural invasion focus number

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Liebig

Ayala

Wilks

et al . Perineural invasion in cancer: a review of the literature. Cancer. 2009;115:3379-3391.

Marchesi

Piemonti

Mantovani

et al . Molecular mechanisms of perineural invasion: a forgotten pathway of dissemination and metastasis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2010;21:77-82.

Liebig

Ayala

Wilks

et al . Perineural invasion is an independent predictor of outcome in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5131-5137.

Chatterjee

Katz

Rashid

et al . Perineural and intraneural invasion in posttherapy pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens predicts poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36:409-417.

Fagan

Collins

Barnes

et al . Perineural invasion in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:637-640.

Harnden

Shelley

Clements

et al . The prognostic significance of perineural invasion in prostatic cancer biopsies: a systematic review. Cancer. 2007;109:13-24.

Brown

Barnes

Mazariegos

et al . Prognostic factors in mobile tongue and floor of mouth carcinoma. Cancer. 1989;64:1195-1202.

Lydiatt

Robbins

Byers

et al . Treatment of stage I and II oral tongue cancer. Head Neck. 1993;15:308-312.

Rahima

Shingaki

Nagata

et al . Prognostic significance of perineural invasion in oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004;97:423-431.

10.

D’Cruz

Siddachari

Walvekar

et al . Elective neck dissection for the management of the N0 neck in early cancer of the oral tongue: need for a randomized controlled trial. Head Neck. 2009;31:618-624.

11.

Goodman

Liu

Ward

et al . Invasion characteristics of oral tongue cancer: frequency of reporting and effect on survival in a population-based study. Cancer. 2009;115:4010-4020.

12.

National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Head and neck cancers: clinical practice guidelines in oncology—v2. http://www.nccn.org/index.asp. Published 2013.

13.

Tai

Chu

et al . Risks and clinical implications of perineural invasion in T1-2 oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2012;34:994-1001.

14.

Tai

Yang

et al . Treatment for T1-2 oral squamous cell carcinoma with or without perineural invasion: neck dissection and postoperative adjuvant therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1995-2002.

15.

Chen

Wang

et al . The impact of perineural invasion and/or lymphovascular invasion on the survival of early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2388-2395.

16.

Tai

Yang

et al . Perineural invasion in T1 oral squamous cell carcinoma indicates the need for aggressive elective neck dissection. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37:1164-1172.

17.

Yeh

Yang

et al . Neck observation is appropriate in T1-2, cN0 oral squamous cell carcinoma without perineural invasion or lymphovascular invasion. Oral Oncol. 2014;50:857-862.

18.

Tai

Yang

et al . Perineural invasion as a major determinant for the aggressiveness associated with increased tumor thickness in T1-2 oral tongue and buccal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3568-3574.

19.

Binmadi

Basile

JR.

Perineural invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a discussion of significance and review of the literature. Oral Oncol. 2011;47:1005-1010.

20.

College of American Pathologists. Cancer Protocols and Checklists: Lip and Oral Cavity, Version 3.2.0.0. Northfield, IL: College of American Pathologists, 2013.

21.

Maru

Ohori

Kattan

et al . Prognostic significance of the diameter of perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens. Hum Pathol. 2001;32:828-833.

22.

Aumayr

Breitegger

Mazal

et al . Quantification of extraprostatic perineural spread and its prognostic value in pT3a pN0 M0 R0 prostate cancer patients. Prostate. 2011;71:1790-1795.

23.

Ueno

Shirouzu

Eishi

et al . Characterization of perineural invasion as a component of colorectal cancer staging. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37:1542-1549.

24.

Miller

Palla

Chen

et al . A novel classification system for perineural invasion in noncutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: histologic subcategories and patient outcomes. Am J Otolaryngol. 2012;33:212-215.

25.

Aivazian

Ebrahimi

Low

et al . Perineural invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma: quantitative subcategorisation of perineural invasion and prognostication. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111:352-358.

26.

Chinn

Spector

Bellile

et al . Impact of perineural invasion in the pathologically N0 neck in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;149:893-899.

27.

Cracchiolo

Migliacci

et al . Patterns of recurrence in oral tongue cancer with perineural invasion. Head Neck. 2018;40:1287-1295.

28.

Chatzistefanou

Lubek

Markou

et al . The role of neck dissection and postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in cN0 patients with PNI-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Oral Oncol. 2014;50:753-758.

29.

Gil

Cavel

Kelly

et al . Paracrine regulation of pancreatic cancer cell invasion by peripheral nerves. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:107-118.

30.

Cavel

Shomron

Shabtay

et al . Endoneurial macrophages induce perineural invasion of pancreatic cancer cells by secretion of GDNF and activation of RET tyrosine kinase receptor. Cancer Res. 2012;72:5733-5743.