Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

Our objective was to compare the accuracy of preoperative positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in detecting cervical nodal metastases in patients treated with neck dissection and to scrutinize the ability of each modality to determine nodal stage.

Study Design

Case series with chart review.

Setting

Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.

Subjects and Methods

Patients who underwent neck dissection at our institution for primary treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and had received preoperative PET/CT and CECT were included in this study. Imaging studies were reinterpreted by 3 specialists within the field and compared for interreader agreement. Concordance between radiology and histopathology was measured using neck levels and sides, along with patient nodal stage. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and agreement coefficients were calculated.

Results

Seventy-three patients were included in the study. Sensitivity was 0.69 and 0.94 (level and side) for PET/CT vs 0.53 and 0.66 for CECT (P = .056, P = .001). Specificity was 0.86 and 0.56 for PET/CT vs 0.91 and 0.76 for CECT (P = .014, P = .024). No significant difference was found in overall accuracy (P = .33, P = .88). The overall agreement percentages between N stage called by imaging modality and pathology were 52% and 55% for PET/CT and CECT, respectively.

Conclusion

No significant difference in sensitivity was found between PET/CT and CECT. CECT was found to have superior specificity compared with PET/CT. The information gleaned from each modality in the pretreatment evaluation of HNSCC appears to be complementary.

Keywords

head and neck squamous cell carcinoma PET/CT contrast-enhanced CT nodal staging preoperative imaging neck dissection

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Argiris

Karamouzis

Raben

et al . Head and neck cancer. Lancet. 2008;371:1695-1709.

Mack

Rieger

Baghi

et al . Cervical lymph nodes. Eur J Radiol. 2008;66:493-500.

Kohler

Kowalski

. How many nodes are needed to stage a neck? A critical appraisal. Euro Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;267:785-791.

Quon

Fischbein

McDougall

et al . Clinical role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and thyroid carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2007;48(suppl 1):58S-67S.

Roh

Yeo

Kim

et al . Utility of 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in the preoperative staging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2007;43:887-893.

Snow

Patel

Leemans

et al . Management of cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1992;249:187-194.

Pitman

. Rationale for elective neck dissection. Am J Otolaryngol. 2000;21:31-37.

Byers

Wolf

Ballantyne

. Rationale for elective modified neck dissection. Head Neck Surg. 1988;10:160-167.

Weber

Romo

Hashmi

. Malignant tumors of the oral cavity and oropharynx: clinical, pathologic, and radiologic evaluation. Neuroimaging Clin North Am. 2003;13:443-464.

10.

Monnet

Cohen

Lecorroller

et al . Cervical lymph nodes [in French]. J Radiol. 2008;89:1020-1036.

11.

Yoo

Henderson

Walker-Dilks

. Evidence-based guideline recommendations on the use of positron emission tomography imaging in head and neck cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2013;25:e33-e66.

12.

Yen

Chang

et al . Prospective study of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma with palpably negative neck. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4371-4376.

13.

Murakami

Uozumi

Hirai

et al . Impact of FDG-PET/CT imaging on nodal staging for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68:377-382.

14.

Yamazaki

Saitoh

Notani

et al . Assessment of cervical lymph node metastases using FDG-PET in patients with head and neck cancer. Ann Nucl Med. 2008;22:177-184.

15.

Rodrigues

Bozza

Christian

et al . Comparison of whole-body PET/CT, dedicated high-resolution head and neck PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced CT in preoperative staging of clinically M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1205-1213.

16.

Kim

Doo

et al . Combined [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography for detecting contralateral neck metastases in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2011;47:376-380.

17.

Roh

Park

Kim

et al . 18F fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with negative neck palpation findings: a prospective study. Radiology. 2014;271:153-161.

18.

Rohde

Dyrvig

Johansen

et al . 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in diagnosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:2271-2279.

19.

Park

Roh

Kim

et al . F FDG PET/CT versus CT/MR imaging and the prognostic value of contralateral neck metastases in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Radiology. 2016;279(2):481-491.

20.

Cammaroto

Quartuccio

Sindoni

et al . The role of PET/CT in the management of patients affected by head and neck tumors: a review of the literature. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273:1961-1973.

21.

Edge

; American Joint Committee on Cancer, American Cancer Society. AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook: From the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2010.

22.

Robbins

Shaha

Medina

et al . Consensus statement on the classification and terminology of neck dissection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134:536-538.

23.

van den Brekel

Stel

Castelijns

et al . Cervical lymph node metastasis: assessment of radiologic criteria. Radiology. 1990;177:379-384.

24.

Anzai

Brunberg

Lufkin

. Imaging of nodal metastases in the head and neck. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7:774-783.

25.

Som

Curtin

Mancuso

. An imaging-based classification for the cervical nodes designed as an adjunct to recent clinically based nodal classifications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125:388-396.

26.

Greene

Page

Fleming

et al . AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2002.

27.

Jeong

Baek

Son

et al . Use of integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT to improve the accuracy of initial cervical nodal evaluation in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2007;29:203-210.

28.

Nair

Mohan

Nilakantan

et al . Impact of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan on initial evaluation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: our experience at a tertiary care center in India. World J Nucl Med. 2015;14:19-24.

29.

Senft

de Bree

Golding

et al . Interobserver variability in chest CT and whole body FDG-PET screening for distant metastases in head and neck cancer patients. Mol Imaging Biol. 2011;13:385-390.

30.

Marcus

Ciarallo

Tahari

et al . Head and neck PET/CT: therapy response interpretation criteria (Hopkins criteria)—interreader reliability, accuracy, and survival outcomes. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1411-1416.

31.

Joo

Yoo Ie

Cho

et al . Prognostic value of preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT for primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271:1685-1691.

32.

Joo

Yoo

Cho

et al . The value of preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT for the assessing contralateral neck in head and neck cancer patients with unilateral node metastasis (N1-3). Clin Otolaryngol. 2014;39:338-344.

33.

Chan

Sanguineti

Richmon

et al . Retrospective review of positron emission tomography with contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the posttreatment setting in human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138:1040-1046.

34.

Schoder

Carlson

Kraus

et al . 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting nodal metastases in patients with oral cancer staged N0 by clinical examination and CT/MRI. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:755-762.

35.

Nahmias

Carlson

Duncan

et al . Positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) scanning for preoperative staging of patients with oral/head and neck cancer. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:2524-2535.

36.

Lee

Choi

Roh

et al . Preoperative contrast-enhanced CT versus (1)(8)F-FDG PET/CT evaluation and the prognostic value of extranodal extension for surgical patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(suppl 3):S1020-S1027.

37.

Fukui

Blodgett

Snyderman

et al . Combined PET-CT in the head and neck: part 2. Diagnostic uses and pitfalls of oncologic imaging. Radiographics. 2005;25:913-930.

38.

Ryu

Roh

Kim

et al . Impact of (18)F-FDG PET/CT staging on management and prognostic stratification in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective observational study. Eur J Cancer. 2016;63:88-96.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.47 MB

Preoperative 18 F-FDG-PET/CT vs Contrast-Enhanced CT to Identify Regional Nodal Metastasis among Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma