Clinical Factors Associated with the Diagnosis of Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis

Abstract

Objective

To determine the predictive value of nasal endoscopic findings and symptoms in the diagnosis of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA).

Study Design

A cross-sectional study.

Setting

A tertiary university hospital.

Subjects and Methods

A total of 116 adults were enrolled in the study: 19 patients with GPA, 29 patients with other rheumatic diseases, and 68 healthy volunteers. All patients were examined with a flexible endoscope, and nasal endoscopic images were recorded and evaluated blindly. The medical history of each patient was taken by a physician blinded to the patient’s diagnosis.

Results

Univariate analysis indicated a statistically significant difference in rhinorrhea (P = .002), postnasal drip (P = .015), epistaxis (P < .001), and saddle nose (P = .017). However, binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated that only history of epistaxis (P = .012; odds ratio, 5.6) was statistically significant in predicting GPA. Univariate analysis showed a statistically significant difference in nasal secretion (P = .028), nasal septal perforation (P < .017), nasal crusting (P < .001), nasal adhesion (P < .001), nasal granuloma (P = .017), and hemorrhagic fragile nasal mucosa (P < .001). A binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated that only hemorrhagic fragile nasal mucosa (P < .001; odds ratio, 52.9) was a statistically significant predictor of GPA.

Conclusions

Given the results of this study, we believe that hemorrhagic fragile nasal mucosa and history of recurrent epistaxis may put patients at risk for GPA and should be investigated accordingly.

Keywords

Wegener’s nasal endoscopic hemorrhagic diagnosis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Scott

Watts

. Systemic vasculitis: epidemiology, classification and environmental factors. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000;59:161e3.

Lutalo

D’Cruz

. Diagnosis and classification of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (aka Wegener’s granulomatosis). J Autoimmun. 2014;48-49:94-98.

Garske

Haack

Beltrán

. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of endonasal activity estimation in granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s). Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012;30(1)(suppl 70):S22-S28.

Erickson

Hwang

. Wegener’s granulomatosis: current trends in diagnosis and management. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;15:170-176.

Holle

Gross

Holl-Ulrich

. Prospective long-term follow-up of patients with localised Wegener’s granulomatosis: does it occur as persistent disease stage? Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:1934-1943.

Leavitt

Fauci

Bloch

. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of Wegener’s granulomatosis. Arthritis Rheum. 1990;33:1101-1107.

Michtalik

Yeh

Pronovost

Brotman

. Impact of attending physician workload on patient care: a survey of hospitalists. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:375-377.

Cannady

Batra

Koening

. Sinonasal Wegener granulomatosis: a single-institution experience with 120 cases. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:757-761.

Del Pero

Chaudhry

Rasmussen

. A disease activity score for ENT involvement in granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s). Laryngoscope. 2013;123:622-628.

10.

Martinez Del Pero

Rasmussen

Chaudhry

Jani

Jayne

. Structured clinical assessment of the ear, nose and throat in patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener’s). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270:345-354.

11.

Srouji

Andrews

Edwards

Lund

. Patterns of presentation and diagnosis of patients with Wegener’s granulomatosis: ENT aspects. J Laryngol Otol. 2007;121:653-658.

12.

Hosmer

Lemeshow

Sturdivant

. Applied Logistic Regression. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Wiley Publishing; 2013.