For graduating medical students, securing a residency in otolaryngology–head and neck surgery has become exceedingly difficult. This commentary explores the ways that applicants and residency programs are reacting to the increasing competitiveness in applying to, interviewing for, and matching to an otolaryngology residency. The commonly held perceptions of applicants are compared to perspectives held by residency program directors and resident selection committees. Unintended consequences of the growing trend for medical students to add a research year to their curriculum are presented. Some cautions and suggestions about how to improve the application and selection process are offered.
Electronic Residency Application Service. Statistics:2015preliminary statistics as of 11/12/2014 (ERAS 2015). https://www.aamc.org/services/eras/stats. Accessed November 19, 2014.
2.
National Resident Matching Program. Charting Outcomes in the Match: Characteristics of Applicants who Matched to Their Preferred Specialty in the 2014 Main Residency Match. Washington, DC: National Resident Matching Program; 2014.
3.
NaclerioRMPintoJMBaroodyFM.Drowning in applications for residency training: a program’s perspective and simple solutions. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;140:695-696.
