Abstract
Objectives:
Compare advanced airway placement (1) success rate and (2) time taken between direct laryngoscopy, video-assisted laryngoscopy, and laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in a difficult infant airway simulator.
Methods:
Prospective, randomized trial in an cademic, tertiary medical center. Twenty-two pediatric residents, interns, and medical students were tested between November 2013 and January 2014. Participants were provided a single training session by faculty from the subspecialties of pediatric otolaryngology, pediatric critical care medicine, and pediatric anesthesiology using a normal infant manikin. Subjects then performed all 3 of the aforementioned advanced airway modalities in a randomized order on a difficult airway model of Pierre-Robin sequence including features of micrognathia, glossoptosis, and cleft palate. Success was defined as a confirmed endotracheal intubation or correct LMA placement by the testing instructor in 120 seconds or less.
Results:
Direct laryngoscopy demonstrated significantly higher placement success rate (77.3%) than video-assisted laryngoscopy (36.4%, P = .0117) and LMA (31.8%, P = .0039). Video-assisted laryngoscopy required a significantly longer amount of time during successful intubations (84.8 seconds, 95% confidence interval [CI] 59.4, 110.1), when compared with direct laryngoscopy (44.9 seconds, 95% CI 33.8, 55.9) and LMA placement (36.6 seconds, 95% CI 24.7, 48.4).
Conclusions:
Pediatric trainees demonstrated significantly higher success using direct laryngoscopy in a difficult airway model of Pierre-Robin. Video-assisted laryngoscopy users took significantly more time to establish a successful advanced airway. Given the potential life-saving implications of advanced airway adjuncts including video laryngoscopy and LMA placement, more extensive training on adjunctive airway management techniques may be useful for in this population.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.