Abstract
Objective
Assess impact of reconstructive procedures on patients undergoing laryngopharyngectomy and to determine whether 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality varied between patients who underwent flap reconstruction and those who did not.
Study Design
Retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement (ACS-NSQIP) database.
Setting
Tertiary medical center.
Subjects and Methods
We reviewed the 2005-2011 ACS-NSQIP database to identify patients undergoing laryngectomy and/or pharyngectomy. Bivariate analysis was done to compare preoperative variables and postoperative outcomes between the flap reconstruction group and non-reconstruction group. Chi-square tests were used for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. Logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate odds ratio to account for potential confounders. To create a valid logistic analysis model, F-test was used to determine whether certain variables should be included in the model.
Results
Six hundred seventy-six patients were included in our study; 213 patients received concurrent flap reconstruction whereas 463 did not. After risk adjustment, analyses revealed no statistically significant difference in wound complication, minor morbidity, and mortality between the 2 groups. The flap reconstruction cohort showed significantly longer operative times (8.09 ± 3.36 hours vs 5.63 ± 3.47 hours; P = .001) and higher major morbidity rate (OR = 5.906, 95% CI, 3.131-11.139, P = .001).
Conclusions
This is the first comprehensive analysis of flap reconstruction for laryngopharyngeal defects using the ACS-NSQIP registry. Additional measures involved in flap reconstruction are associated with an increase in major morbidity but not mortality. An understanding of these variables may optimize the decision-making process for patients undergoing laryngectomy and/or pharyngectomy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
