Regional Differences in Gender Promotion and Scholarly Productivity

Abstract

Objectives:

Identify whether there are regional differences in previously described gender disparities in scholarly productivity and faculty rank among academic otolaryngologists.

Methods:

Online faculty listings from 95 academic otolaryngology departments were searched to identify clinical faculty and further organize them by gender, academic rank, fellowship training status, and institutional location. The Scopus database was used to assess various bibliometrics of these otolaryngologists, including the h-index, number of publications, and publication range (in years).

Results:

Analysis included 1,127 otolaryngologists, 916 men (81.3%) and 211 women (18.7%). Female faculty comprised 15.4% in the Midwest, 18.8% in the Northeast, 21.3% in the South, and 19.0% in the West (p=0.44). Overall, men obtained significantly higher senior academic ranks (Associate Professor or Professor) compared to women (59.8% vs. 40.2%, p<0.0001). Regional gender differences among senior faculty were found in the South (59.8% men vs. 37.3% women, p=0.0003) and in the Northeast (56.4% men vs. 24.1% women, p<0.0001) with concomitant gender differences in scholarly impact, as measured by the h-index (South, p=0.0003; Northeast, p=0.0001). Among geographic subdivisions, female representation at senior ranks was lowest in the Mid-Atlantic (21.9%), New England (17.1%), and West South Central (33.3%), while highest in the Pacific (60.0%) and Mountain (71.4%) regions. No regional gender differences were found in fellowship training patterns (p-values>0.05).

Conclusions:

Gender disparities in academic rank and scholarly productivity exist regionally, most notably in the Northeast where women in otolaryngology are most underrepresented relative to men at senior academic ranks and in scholarly productivity.