Abstract
Objectives:
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become standard practice for intermediate-thickness head and neck melanoma (HNM) but remains controversial for melanomas >4 mm thick. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and the prognostic value of SLNB in patients with thick HNM.
Methods:
Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing SLNB for thick HNM at a large cancer center between June 2000 and December 2012. Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors was performed. False negative SLNB was defined as recurrence within a previously identified negative nodal basin.
Results:
A total of 107 patients with thick HNMs were identified, of which 77 met inclusion criteria. Population characteristics included a mean patient age of 62.9 (range 4-87) with a male predominance (82%). Mean Breslow thickness was 6.04 mm (range 4-21 mm). Of the 77 patients undergoing attempted SLNB, 7 had no identifiable SLN (9%). For the remaining 91% with identifiable SLN(s), the mean number of nodes identified was 3.3 (range 1-13). The SLN positivity rate was 24%. A false-negative SLNB occurred in two patients (3.8%). With a median follow-up of 36 months, the estimated 5-year disease-free, disease-specific and overall survival rates were 47%, 80%, and 71%, respectively. A positive SLN was significantly linked to shortened DFS (35% v. 51%, P = 0.028) and DSS (65% v. 85%, P = 0.04) and trended towards significance for OS (59% v. 76%, P = 0.09).
Conclusions:
SLNB provides accurate staging of the regional node basin and important prognostic information for patients with thick HNM.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
