Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study was to compare conventional miniplate (Champy’s) and 3-dimensional miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular fracture.
Study Design
Prospective study.
Setting
The study was carried out in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Govt. Dental College, Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, India.
Subjects and Methods
A prospective randomized clinical trial was carried out in 50 patients. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a 2.0-mm 3-dimensional miniplate (group A) or a 2.0-mm conventional miniplate (group B). All patients were followed up for 12 weeks postoperatively. Complications were analyzed according to the type of plate used and the site of fracture.
Results
Twenty-eight fracture sites were treated with the 3-dimensional miniplate and 28 with the conventional miniplate. Five complications occurred, representing 8.9% of the total. Two complications occurred in group A and 3 in group B, with complication rates equaling 7.14% and 10.71%, respectively. When comparing the overall complication rates according to plates used, the χ2 test showed no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P > .05).
Conclusion
No major difference in terms of treatment outcome is observed in both systems, and both are equally effective in managing mandibular fracture.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.