Objective. Tongue cancer is well known to have a high potential for locoregional metastasis. However, controversy about electively treating the neck in early-stage tongue cancer remains. Although many risk factors related to cervical occult nodal metastasis (ONM) have been investigated, the ability of the tumor to spread, a phenomenon that results from the intrinsic property of the tumor and its interaction with the surrounding environment, has seldom been addressed.
Study Design. Retrospective case series with chart review.
Setting. Tertiary referral hospital of university.
Subjects. Patients with early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue.
Results. In 71 eligible enrolled patients, ONM was detected in 19 (27%) patients, while the results were negative (ONM(−)) in 52 (73%) patients. The average tumor satellite distance (TSD) in the ONM(+) group was 4.1 ± 4.3 mm, in contrast to that in the ONM(−) group (1.0 ± 1.5 mm; P < .001). When stratified by increased TSD values, the significance of the difference between the 2 groups increased. For clinical applications, the optimal TSD threshold for determining the ONM probability was 3.5 mm. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that TSD was an independent prognosticator.
Conclusions. The results indicate that TSD is a feasible pathological parameter that is useful for determining the status of cervical nodal metastasis. It can be used as an indicator of potential cervical subclinical disease and as a guideline for deciding the necessity and modality of neck treatment.
SanoDMyersJN. Metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2007;26:645-662.
2.
HuangSFKangCJLinCY. Neck treatment of patients with early stage oral tongue cancer: comparison between observation, supraomohyoid dissection, and extended dissection. Cancer. 2008;112:1066-1075.
3.
Al-RajhiNKhafagaYEl-HusseinyJ. Early stage carcinoma of oral tongue: prognostic factors for local control and survival. Oral Oncol. 2000;36:508-514.
4.
MyersJNGreenbergJSMoVRobertsD. Extracapsular spread: a significant predictor of treatment failure in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue. Cancer. 2001;92:3030-3036.
5.
CunninghamMJJohnsonJTMyersENSchrammVLJrThearlePB. Cervical lymph node metastasis after local excision of early squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Am J Surg. 1986;152:361-366.
6.
KurokawaHYamashitaYTakedaSZhangMFukuyamaHTakahashiT. Risk factors for late cervical lymph node metastases in patients with stage I or II carcinoma of the tongue. Head Neck. 2002;24:731-736.
7.
OkamotoMNishimineMKishiM. Prediction of delayed neck metastasis in patients with stage I/II squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. J Oral Pathol Med. 2002;31:227-233.
8.
TeichgraeberJFClairmontAA. The incidence of occult metastases for cancer of the oral tongue and floor of the mouth: treatment rationale. Head Neck Surg. 1984;7:15-21.
9.
ByersRMEl-NaggarAKLeeYY. Can we detect or predict the presence of occult nodal metastases in patients with squamous carcinoma of the oral tongue?Head Neck. 1998;20:138-144.
10.
AlviAJohnsonJT. Extracapsular spread in the clinically negative neck (N0): implications and outcome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;114:65-70.
11.
Keski-SänttiHAtulaTTikkaJHollménJMäkitieAALeivoI. Predictive value of histopathologic parameters in early squamous cell carcinoma of oral tongue. Oral Oncol. 2007;43:1007-1013.
12.
YuenAPWeiWIWongYMTangKC. Elective neck dissection versus observation in the treatment of early oral tongue carcinoma. Head Neck. 1997;19:583-588.
13.
HaddadinKJSoutarDSOliverRJWebsterMHRobertsonAGMacDonaldDG. Improved survival for patients with clinically T1/T2, N0 tongue tumors undergoing a prophylactic neck dissection. Head Neck. 1999;21:517-525.
14.
KowalskiLPSanabriaA. Elective neck dissection in oral carcinoma: a critical review of the evidence. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2007;27:113-117.
WhiteDByersRM. What is the preferred initial method of treatment for squamous carcinoma of the tongue?Am J Surg. 1980;140:553-555.
17.
LimSCZhangSIshiiG. Predictive markers for late cervical metastasis in stage I and II invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:166-172.
18.
HiratsukaHMiyakawaANakamoriKKidoYSunakawaHKohamaG. Multivariate analysis of occult lymph node metastasis as a prognostic indicator for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Cancer. 1997;80:351-356.
19.
Gonzalez-MolesMAEstebanFRodriguez-ArchillaARuiz-AvilaSGonzalez-MolesS. Importance of tumour thickness measurement in prognosis of tongue cancer. Oral Oncol. 2002;38:394-397.
20.
KuritaHUeharaSFunamotoSNakatsukaAKobayashiHKurashinaK. Intraoperative digital microscopic assessment of the deep surgical margins in oral carcinoma surgery: a preliminary report. Am J Surg. 2006;191:84-88.
21.
Brandwein-GenslerMTeixeiraMSLewisCM. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: histologic risk assessment, but not margin status, is strongly predictive of local disease-free and overall survival. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:167-178.
22.
FukanoHMatsuuraHHasegawaYNakamuraS. Depth of invasion as a predictive factor for cervical lymph node metastasis in tongue carcinoma. Head Neck. 1997;19:205-210.
23.
AnnerothGBatsakisJLunaM. Review of the literature and a recommended system of malignancy grading in oral squamous cell carcinomas. Scand J Dent Res. 1987;95:229-249.
24.
YangTLWangCPKoJYLinCFLouPJ. Association of tumor satellite distance with prognosis and contralateral neck recurrence of tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2008;30:631-638.
25.
YangTLKoJYChangYL. Involved margin of tongue cancer: the impact of tumor satellites on prognosis. Head Neck. 2008;30:845-851.
26.
BryneMBoysenMAlfsenCG. The invasive front of carcinomas. The most important area for tumour prognosis?Anticancer Res. 1998;18:4757-4764.
27.
PyoSWHashimotoMKimYS. Expression of E-cadherin, P-cadherin and N-cadherin in oral squamous cell carcinoma: correlation with the clinicopathologic features and patient outcome. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007;35:1-9.
28.
YangTLWuCTKoJYWangCPLouPJChangYL. Significance of tumor satellite variables in reflecting epithelial-mesenchymal transition of tongue cancer. Oral Oncol. In press.
29.
HarristTJRigelDSDayCLJr. “Microscopic satellites” are more highly associated with regional lymph node metastases than is primary melanoma thickness. Cancer. 1984;53:2183-2187.
30.
KimseyTFCohenTPatelABusamKJBradyMS. Microscopic satellitosis in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma: implications for nodal basin staging. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1176-1183.
ClaytonBDLeshinBHitchcockMGMarksMWhiteWL. Utility of rush paraffin-embedded tangential sections in the management of cutaneous neoplasms. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26:671-678.
33.
SasakiAKaiSIwashitaYHiranoSOhtaMKitanoS. Microsatellite distribution and indication for locoregional therapy in small hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;103:299-306.
34.
BuzaidACRossMIBalchCM. Critical analysis of the current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma and proposal of a new staging system. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:1039-1051.
35.
SugarbakerPH. Management of peritoneal-surface malignancy: the surgeon’s role. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1999;384:576-587.
36.
Brandwein-GenslerMTeixeiraMSLewisCM. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: histologic risk assessment, but not margin status, is strongly predictive of local disease-free and overall survival. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:167-178.
37.
Brandwein-GenslerMSmithRVWangB. Validation of the histologic risk model in a new cohort of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34:676-688.
38.
GreeneFLPageDLFlemingID. American Joint Comittee on Cancer. Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed.New York, NY: Springer; 2002.
39.
BarnesLEvesonJWReichartPSidranskyD. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2005.
40.
BryneMKoppangHSLillengRSteneTBangGDabelsteenE. New malignancy grading is a better prognostic indicator than Broders’ grading in oral squamous cell carcinomas. J Oral Pathol Med. 1989;18:432-437.
41.
FerlitoASilverCERinaldoA. Elective management of the neck in oral cavity squamous carcinoma: current concepts supported by prospective studies. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;47:5-9.
42.
Diniz-FreitasMGarcia-CaballeroTAntunez-LopezJGandara-ReyJMGarcia-GarciaA. Reduced E-cadherin expression is an indicator of unfavourable prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2006;42:190-200.
43.
KuraharaSShinoharaMIkebeT. Expression of MMPS, MT-MMP, and TIMPs in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: correlations with tumor invasion and metastasis. Head Neck. 1999;21:627-638.
44.
KatayamaABandohNKishibeK. Expressions of matrix metalloproteinases in early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma as predictive indicators for tumor metastases and prognosis. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:634-640.
45.
FidlerIJKimSJLangleyRR. The role of the organ microenvironment in the biology and therapy of cancer metastasis. J Cell Biochem. 2007;101:927-936.
46.
FidlerIJ. Tumor heterogeneity and the biology of cancer invasion and metastasis. Cancer Res. 1978;38:2651-2660.
47.
ZhouXTemamSOhM. Global expression-based classification of lymph node metastasis and extracapsular spread of oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Neoplasia. 2006;8:925-932.
48.
SparanoAWeinsteinGChalianAYodulMWeberR. Multivariate predictors of occult neck metastasis in early oral tongue cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;131:472-476.
49.
Po Wing YuenALamKYLamLK. Prognostic factors of clinically stage I and II oral tongue carcinoma: a comparative study of stage, thickness, shape, growth pattern, invasive front malignancy grading, Martinez-Gimeno score, and pathologic features. Head Neck. 2002;24:513-520.
50.
SawairFAIrwinCRGordonDJLeonardAGStephensonMNapierSS. Invasive front grading: reliability and usefulness in the management of oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 2003;32:1-9.
