Abstract
Objective. Targeted parathyroidectomy is the gold standard for localized parathyroid disease. A robotic-assisted approach has not been investigated. The aim was to assess the feasibility of a robotic technique that avoids a neck scar.
Study Design. Feasibility study.
Setting. Tertiary referral center.
Subjects and Methods. Eleven patients with primary hyperparathyroidism were prospectively evaluated. Triple modality concordant localization was a prerequisite. All patients underwent robotic-assisted parathyroidectomy (RAP). Outcome variables assessed were operative time, voice change, biochemical cure, and histopathological confirmation. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included subjective assessment of pain and scar cosmesis, Voice Handicap Index 2, and EQ-5D quality-of-life assessment. Mean follow-up was 6 months (range, 3-12 months).
Results. The parathyroid adenoma was successfully excised in all cases with negligible blood loss (<5 mL). There was 1 conversion. There was no voice change in any case. Robot docking time plateaued to 10 minutes after 8 cases. Mean exposure and console times (31 and 51 minutes, respectively) were affected by body habitus. The mean visual analog scale for scar cosmesis was 75% on the first postoperative day, improving to 92% at 6 months and 95% at 1 year. Pain scores decreased to 8% at 2 weeks. All 5 EQ-5D quality-of-life parameters significantly improved following surgery.
Conclusion. The robotic approach is feasible for performing targeted parathyroidectomy that avoids a neck scar. The clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the robotic approach compared with conventional targeted parathyroidectomy warrant further evaluation to establish if this represents a viable alternative to the existing targeted techniques.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
